Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Idelalisib in Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

A Phase 2 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of GS-1101 (CAL-101) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01393106
Enrollment
25
Registered
2011-07-13
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2018-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hodgkin Lymphoma

Keywords

HL, idelalisib, CAL-101, GS-1101, PI3K

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of idelalisib in participants with relapsed of refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL). The primary objective will be to assess the overall response rate. Eligible participants will initiate oral therapy with idelalisib at a starting dose of 150 mg twice daily. Treatment with idelalisib will continue until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Interventions

DRUGIdelalisib

Idelalisib tablets administered orally

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 12 years * Karnofsky performance score of ≥ 60 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of 0, 1, or 2) * Histologically confirmed diagnosis of classic HL (ie, nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte depleted, and or lymphocyte rich types) * Nodal HL that shows fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avidity (defined as focal or diffuse FDG uptake above background in a location incompatible with normal anatomy or physiology), and is measurable (defined as the presence of ≥ 1 nodal lesion that measures ≥ 2 cm in a single dimension as assessed by CT, PET/CT, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) * Relapsed or refractory HL after prior myeloablative therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or after ≥ 2 prior chemotherapy-containing regimens and no curative option with conventional therapy * Discontinuation of all radiotherapy or chemotherapy for the treatment of HL greater than or equal to 3 weeks before initiation of study treatment and discontinuation of all radioimmunotherapy for HL (Visit 2) * All acute toxic effects (excluding alopecia, neurotoxicity, or anemia) of any prior antitumor therapy resolved to Grade ≤ 2 before initiation of study treatment (Visit 2) * For men and women of childbearing potential willingness to abstain from sexual intercourse or employ an effective method of contraception during the study drug administration and follow-up periods * Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent and to comply with protocol requirements

Exclusion criteria

* Known active central nervous system or leptomeningeal lymphoma * History of a non-lymphoma malignancy except for the following: adequately treated local basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, cervical carcinoma in situ, superficial bladder cancer, localized prostate cancer, other adequately treated Stage 1 or 2 cancer currently in complete remission, or any other cancer that has been in complete remission for ≥ 5 years * Evidence of ongoing systemic bacterial, fungal, or viral infection (excluding viral upper respiratory tract infections) at the time of initiation of study treatment (Visit 2) * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Ongoing alcohol or drug addiction * Known history of drug-induced liver injury, chronic active hepatitis C virus (HCV), chronic active hepatitis B virus (HBV), alcoholic liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, ongoing extrahepatic obstruction caused by stones, cirrhosis of the liver or portal hypertension * History of prior allogeneic bone marrow progenitor cell or solid organ transplantation * Ongoing immunosuppressive therapy, including systemic corticosteroids. * Prior therapy with idelalisib * Exposure to another investigational drug within 3 weeks prior to start of study treatment * Concurrent participation in another therapeutic treatment trial * Prior or ongoing clinically significant illness, medical condition, surgical history, physical finding, ECG finding, or laboratory abnormality that, in the investigator's opinion, could affect the safety of the patient; alter the absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of the study drug; or impair the assessment of study results * Prior therapy with any drug that inhibits Akt, Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK), Janus kinase (JAK), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) (including idelalisib), or spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Response RateUp to Week 110Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed based on the International Working Group Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson, 2007), and was defined as the proportion of participants achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by the investigator. * CR was defined as the complete resolution of all disease-related radiological abnormalities and the disappearance of all signs and symptoms related to the disease. * PR was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in the sum of the products of the longest perpendicular diameters of all index lesions, with no new lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in the Sum of the Product of the Greatest Perpendicular Diameters (SPD) of Target Lymph Nodes as Documented RadiographicallyBaseline, Week 8, Week 48, and up to Week 110
Change From Baseline in Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Uptake in Lymph Nodes as Assessed by Positron-emission Tomography (PET)Up to Week 110
Time to ResponseUp to Week 110Time to response (TTR) was defined as the interval from the start of idelalisib treatment to the first documentation of CR or PR.
Overall SurvivalUp to Week 110Overall survival was defined as the time from start of idelalisib treatment to death from any cause.
Progression Free SurvivalUp to Week 110Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the interval from the start of idelalisib treatment to the earlier of the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause.
Time to Treatment FailureUp to Week 110Time to treatment failure (TTF) was defined as the interval from the start of idelalisib treatment to the earlier of the first documentation of disease progression, the permanent cessation of idelalisib therapy due to an adverse event, or death from any cause.
Duration of ResponseUp to Week 110Duration of response (DOR) was defined as the interval from the first documentation of PR or CR to the earlier of the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause.
Changes in Performance Status as Documented Using the Karnofsky Performance Criteria for Participants ≥ 16 Years of Age and the Lansky Performance Criteria for Participants < 16 Years of AgeBaseline and up to Week 110Changes in performance status were assessed using the Karnofsky performance criteria for participants ≥ 16 years of age and the Lansky performance criteria for participants \< 16 years of age. Since there were no participants \< 16 years of age, only the Karnofsky performance criteria were used. The change in Karnofsky performance status was reported as the best (highest change score) and worst (lowest change score) change from baseline using the Karnofsky performance criteria. The Karnofsky score classifies patients according to their functional impairment. Scores are on a scale from 0-100, the lower the score, the worse the survival for most serious illnesses.
Changes in the Plasma Concentrations of Disease-associated Chemokines and CytokinesUp to Week 110
Overall Safety Profile of IdelalisibUp to Week 110The overall safety of idelalisib was assessed as the percentage of participants experiencing adverse events (AEs; Serious AEs, Grade ≥ 3 AEs, AEs related to idelalisib, and AEs leading to discontinuation of idelalisib), clinically significant abnormal electrocardiograms (ECG), and laboratory abnormalities. Clinically significant abnormalities in ECG were as determined by the investigator.
Compliance With Study Drug Dosing as Assessed by Accounting for Used and Unused DrugUp to Week 110
Idelalisib Trough and Peak Plasma Concentration at Week 4Predose and 1.5 hours postdose at Week 4Plasma samples were collected predose (trough) and 1.5 hours postdose (peak). The minimum and maximum value among participants sampled at each time point are presented. Results of less than the lower limit of quantitation (ie, 5 ng/mL) were treated as zero prior to the achievement of the first quantifiable concentration and as missing otherwise.
Changes in Health-related Quality of Life as Reported Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) QuestionnaireBaseline and up to Week 110Change in health-related quality of life was reported by participants using the FACT-Lym questionnaire assessment tool. Results are presented as the mean (SD) best change from baseline in FACT-Lym total score, which was defined as the highest change score (improvement) after baseline. The FACT-Lym total score is on a scale from 0-168, with higher scores associated with a better quality of life.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in the United States. The first participant was screened on 15 September 2011. The last study visit occurred on 28 August 2014.

Pre-assignment details

32 participants were screened.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Idelalisib
Idelalisib up to 300 mg (75, 100, or 150 mg tablets) administered orally twice daily until tumor progression or development of unacceptable toxicity.
25
Total25

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event3
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIdelalisib
Age, Continuous43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Pathologic Subtype
Lymphocyte Rich
2 participants
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Pathologic Subtype
Nodular Sclerosis
23 participants
Disease Stage at Screening
Stage I
1 participants
Disease Stage at Screening
Stage II
8 participants
Disease Stage at Screening
Stage III
6 participants
Disease Stage at Screening
Stage IV
10 participants
Karnofsky Performance Status83 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
22 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
19 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants
Time Since Diagnosis (years)3.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.26

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Response Rate

Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed based on the International Working Group Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson, 2007), and was defined as the proportion of participants achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by the investigator. * CR was defined as the complete resolution of all disease-related radiological abnormalities and the disappearance of all signs and symptoms related to the disease. * PR was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in the sum of the products of the longest perpendicular diameters of all index lesions, with no new lesions.

Time frame: Up to Week 110

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Set: participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IdelalisibOverall Response Rate20.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Uptake in Lymph Nodes as Assessed by Positron-emission Tomography (PET)

Time frame: Up to Week 110

Population: An analysis of changes in FDG uptake by the tumor was not conducted due to unavailability of lymph node biopsy samples.

Secondary

Changes in Health-related Quality of Life as Reported Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Questionnaire

Change in health-related quality of life was reported by participants using the FACT-Lym questionnaire assessment tool. Results are presented as the mean (SD) best change from baseline in FACT-Lym total score, which was defined as the highest change score (improvement) after baseline. The FACT-Lym total score is on a scale from 0-168, with higher scores associated with a better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 110

Population: FACT-Lym Evaluable Analysis Set: participants who had sufficient baseline and on-study measurements to provide interpretable results for this endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IdelalisibChanges in Health-related Quality of Life as Reported Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Questionnaire5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.24
Secondary

Changes in Performance Status as Documented Using the Karnofsky Performance Criteria for Participants ≥ 16 Years of Age and the Lansky Performance Criteria for Participants < 16 Years of Age

Changes in performance status were assessed using the Karnofsky performance criteria for participants ≥ 16 years of age and the Lansky performance criteria for participants \< 16 years of age. Since there were no participants \< 16 years of age, only the Karnofsky performance criteria were used. The change in Karnofsky performance status was reported as the best (highest change score) and worst (lowest change score) change from baseline using the Karnofsky performance criteria. The Karnofsky score classifies patients according to their functional impairment. Scores are on a scale from 0-100, the lower the score, the worse the survival for most serious illnesses.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 110

Population: Participants in the ITT Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IdelalisibChanges in Performance Status as Documented Using the Karnofsky Performance Criteria for Participants ≥ 16 Years of Age and the Lansky Performance Criteria for Participants < 16 Years of AgeBest Change6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
IdelalisibChanges in Performance Status as Documented Using the Karnofsky Performance Criteria for Participants ≥ 16 Years of Age and the Lansky Performance Criteria for Participants < 16 Years of AgeWorst Change-1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Secondary

Changes in the Plasma Concentrations of Disease-associated Chemokines and Cytokines

Time frame: Up to Week 110

Population: This analysis was not conducted due to discrepancies with the transfer of samples.

Secondary

Compliance With Study Drug Dosing as Assessed by Accounting for Used and Unused Drug

Time frame: Up to Week 110

Population: ITT Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IdelalisibCompliance With Study Drug Dosing as Assessed by Accounting for Used and Unused DrugNumber of doses dispensed463 number of dosesStandard Deviation 462.3
IdelalisibCompliance With Study Drug Dosing as Assessed by Accounting for Used and Unused DrugNumber of doses taken329 number of dosesStandard Deviation 321.1
Secondary

Duration of Response

Duration of response (DOR) was defined as the interval from the first documentation of PR or CR to the earlier of the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause.

Time frame: Up to Week 110

Population: Responding Analysis Set: participants who achieved a best response of CR or PR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
IdelalisibDuration of Response8.4 months
Secondary

Idelalisib Trough and Peak Plasma Concentration at Week 4

Plasma samples were collected predose (trough) and 1.5 hours postdose (peak). The minimum and maximum value among participants sampled at each time point are presented. Results of less than the lower limit of quantitation (ie, 5 ng/mL) were treated as zero prior to the achievement of the first quantifiable concentration and as missing otherwise.

Time frame: Predose and 1.5 hours postdose at Week 4

Population: Participants in the ITT Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IdelalisibIdelalisib Trough and Peak Plasma Concentration at Week 4Trough - minimum (n = 20)142 ng/mL
IdelalisibIdelalisib Trough and Peak Plasma Concentration at Week 4Trough - maximum (n = 20)2120.0 ng/mL
IdelalisibIdelalisib Trough and Peak Plasma Concentration at Week 4Peak - minimum (n = 22)90.2 ng/mL
IdelalisibIdelalisib Trough and Peak Plasma Concentration at Week 4Peak - maximum (n = 22)8570.0 ng/mL
Secondary

Overall Safety Profile of Idelalisib

The overall safety of idelalisib was assessed as the percentage of participants experiencing adverse events (AEs; Serious AEs, Grade ≥ 3 AEs, AEs related to idelalisib, and AEs leading to discontinuation of idelalisib), clinically significant abnormal electrocardiograms (ECG), and laboratory abnormalities. Clinically significant abnormalities in ECG were as determined by the investigator.

Time frame: Up to Week 110

Population: ITT Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IdelalisibOverall Safety Profile of IdelalisibAny AE96.0 percentage of participants
IdelalisibOverall Safety Profile of IdelalisibSerious AE36.0 percentage of participants
IdelalisibOverall Safety Profile of IdelalisibGrade ≥ 3 AE48.0 percentage of participants
IdelalisibOverall Safety Profile of IdelalisibAE related to idelalisib76.0 percentage of participants
IdelalisibOverall Safety Profile of IdelalisibAE leading to permanent drug discontinuation8.0 percentage of participants
IdelalisibOverall Safety Profile of IdelalisibClinically significant abnormal ECG at Week 160 percentage of participants
IdelalisibOverall Safety Profile of IdelalisibGrade 3 or 4 hemoglobin4.0 percentage of participants
IdelalisibOverall Safety Profile of IdelalisibGrade 3 or 4 neutrophils8.0 percentage of participants
IdelalisibOverall Safety Profile of IdelalisibGrade 3 or 4 platelets4.0 percentage of participants
IdelalisibOverall Safety Profile of IdelalisibGrade 3 or 4 alanine aminotransferase20.0 percentage of participants
IdelalisibOverall Safety Profile of IdelalisibGrade 3 or 4 aspartate aminotransferase16.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from start of idelalisib treatment to death from any cause.

Time frame: Up to Week 110

Population: ITT Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
IdelalisibOverall Survival19.8 months
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in the Sum of the Product of the Greatest Perpendicular Diameters (SPD) of Target Lymph Nodes as Documented Radiographically

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 48, and up to Week 110

Population: ITT Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
IdelalisibPercent Change From Baseline in the Sum of the Product of the Greatest Perpendicular Diameters (SPD) of Target Lymph Nodes as Documented RadiographicallyPercent Change at Week 8 (n = 24)-14.1 percent change in SPD
IdelalisibPercent Change From Baseline in the Sum of the Product of the Greatest Perpendicular Diameters (SPD) of Target Lymph Nodes as Documented RadiographicallyPercent Change at Week 48 (n = 5)-45.9 percent change in SPD
IdelalisibPercent Change From Baseline in the Sum of the Product of the Greatest Perpendicular Diameters (SPD) of Target Lymph Nodes as Documented RadiographicallyBest Percent Change from Baseline (n = 24)-24.1 percent change in SPD
Secondary

Progression Free Survival

Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the interval from the start of idelalisib treatment to the earlier of the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause.

Time frame: Up to Week 110

Population: ITT Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
IdelalisibProgression Free Survival2.3 months
Secondary

Time to Response

Time to response (TTR) was defined as the interval from the start of idelalisib treatment to the first documentation of CR or PR.

Time frame: Up to Week 110

Population: Responding Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
IdelalisibTime to Response2.0 months
Secondary

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to treatment failure (TTF) was defined as the interval from the start of idelalisib treatment to the earlier of the first documentation of disease progression, the permanent cessation of idelalisib therapy due to an adverse event, or death from any cause.

Time frame: Up to Week 110

Population: No data are presented because time to treatment failure data were not collected.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026