Skip to content

Navigation Brain Stimulation for Evaluation of the Neuroprotective Drug Efficiency in Patients After Ischemic Stroke.

Navigation Brain Stimulation (NBS) for Evaluation of the Neuroprotective Drug Efficiency in Patients After Ischemic Stroke.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01388738
Acronym
3C
Enrollment
30
Registered
2011-07-07
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2011-11-30
Last updated
2011-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Navigation Brain Stimulation (NEXSTIM), cerebroprotective drug effectiveness, acute ischemic stroke

Brief summary

Ischemic stroke (IS) causes high mortality and severe disability. To improve outcome it's very important to choose the right way of the management of the patient and an appropriate drugs. There is a large number of the so-called neuroprotective drugs, which were effective in laboratory, but didn't show positive results in clinical studies with using traditional clinical scales scores as a primary outcome measures. Specialists suggest, that the investigators could receive better results if the investigators change design of the studies, particularly if the investigators select more precise and sensitive method of assessment. Aim of this study: to determine the role of navigated brain stimulation (NBS) for evaluation of the changes in the motor centers and motor tracts after administration of different cerebroprotective drugs. (The substances won't be compared to each other).

Interventions

DRUGciticoline

citicoline IV 2000 mg, then citicoline 900 mg/day (300mg\*3 times per day) per os

choline alfoscerate IV 1000mg daily 10 days

DRUGcerebrolysin

Cerebrolysin IV 10 ml daily 10 days

Sponsors

Nycomed
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Veropharm
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ever Neuro Pharma GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Clinical Institute of the Brain, Russia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients from 3 to 6 months after ischemic stroke * hemispheric infarction * paresis from 2 to 4 scores by Medical Research Council Weakness Scale (MRC)

Exclusion criteria

* history of seizures * pregnancy, lactation * cognitive deficiency (poor compliance) * acute renal failure * acute hepatic failure * oncological history * cardiac pacemakers and other metal implants * regular intake of any nootropic drugs * Modified Ashford Scale scores 3 and more * regular intake of anticonvulsants, neuromuscular relaxants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
MEP(motor evoked potential) parameter: motor threshold2 months
MEP(motor evoked potential) parameter: latency2 months
MEP(motor evoked potential) parameter: amplitude2 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants with Adverse Events2 months
Change from Baseline in Alpha waves percentage2 monthsEEG parameter
Change from Baseline in Beta waves percentage2 monthsEEG parameters
Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale for Muscle Strength scores2 months
Change from Baseline in Theta waves percentage2 monthsEEG parameter
Presence of the abnormal epileptiform activity2 monthsEEG parameters
Change from Baseline in Delta waves percentage2 monthsEEG parameter
Barthel index2 months
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)2 months

Countries

Russia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026