Skip to content

Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by PIVS Versus Surgeon Cut Mesh

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01387685
Enrollment
0
Registered
2011-07-04
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2014-06-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Floor Prolapse

Brief summary

Women with pelvic floor prolapse who underwent surgery with mesh will be enrolled. The investigators will compare data from the chart, telephone interviews and physical examinations between those who underwent mesh placement to those who underwent placement of PIVS.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women who underwent surgery for pelvic floor prolapse

Exclusion criteria

* Women who did not have surgery for pelvic floor prolapse.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Satisfaction with study outcomesix to twelve months after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Side effects of the surgery: pain, vaginal erosion by tape, bleedingWithin six to twelve months after study

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026