Skip to content

HIV Attachment Inhibitor to Treat Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 (HIV-1) Infections

A Phase IIb Randomized, Controlled, Partially-Blinded Trial to Investigate Safety, Efficacy and Dose-Response of BMS-663068 in Treatment-experienced HIV-1 Subjects, Followed by an Open-Label Period on the Recommended Dose

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01384734
Enrollment
254
Registered
2011-06-29
Start date
2011-07-26
Completion date
2017-05-12
Last updated
2018-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of four doses of BMS-663068 with Raltegravir (RAL) + Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF). At least 1 dose of BMS-663068 can be identified which is safe, well tolerated, and efficacious when combined with RAL + TDF for treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected subjects. PHENOSENSE® is a registered trademark of Monogram Biosciences.

Detailed description

Masking: Double-blind for BMS-6630368 treatment groups until the Week 24 Primary Endpoint analysis, then open label. The reference groups is all open-label. Arms: 5 (4 BMS-663068 treatment groups and 1 reference group) Intervention Model: Parallel (with unblinding after the Week 24 primary endpoint analysis)

Interventions

DRUGBMS-663068 400 mg

Tablets, Oral, 400 mg, twice daily (BID), 24+ weeks until optimal dose is selected, or 96 weeks if optimal dose

DRUGBMS-663068 800 mg

Tablets, Oral, 800 mg, twice daily (BID), 24+ weeks until optimal dose is selected, or 96 weeks if optimal dose

DRUGBMS-663068 600 mg

Tablets, Oral, 600 mg, once daily (QD), 24+ weeks until optimal dose is selected, or 96 weeks if optimal dose

DRUGBMS-663068 1200 mg

Tablets, Oral, 1200 mg, once daily (QD), 24+ weeks until optimal dose is selected, or 96 weeks if optimal dose

Tablets, Oral, 400 mg, twice daily (BID), 24+ weeks until optimal dose is selected, or 96 weeks if optimal dose

DRUGTenofovir 300 mg

Tablets, Oral, 300 mg, Once daily (QD), 24+ weeks until optimal dose is selected, or 96 weeks if optimal dose

Tablets, Oral, 100 mg, Once daily, 96 weeks

Capsules, Oral, 300 mg, Once daily, 96 weeks

Sponsors

ViiV Healthcare
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥ 1000 copies/ml at Screening * Treatment experience with antiretroviral therapies (excluding integrase inhibitors) * Screening PHENOSENSE Entry indicating BMS-626529 inhibitory concentration (IC)50 \< 0.1 μM * Cluster of differentiation (CD)4+ T-cell count \> 50 cells/mm3

Exclusion criteria

* History (or evidence at Screening) of genotypic resistance to any component of the study regimen \[ Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF), Atazanavir (ATV), Raltegravir (RAL)\] * Certain laboratory and electrocardiogram (ECG) values

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) < 50 Copies Per Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 24Week 24Percentage of participants with plasma HIV 1 RNA \< 50 c/mL at Week 24 using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot algorithm was assessed to evaluate the antiviral activity. Treatment comparisons were not performed as this was an estimation study. Response rates were tabulated by treatment arm with exact Clopper-Pearson binomial 95 percentage confidence intervals (CI). Virologic success or failure was determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA assessment while the participant was on-treatment within the snapshot window of the visit of interest. Intent-To-Treat-Exposed (ITT-E) Population includes all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Discontinuation Due to AEs up to Week 24Up to Week 24Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or suspected transmission of an infectious agent via the study drug were categorized as SAE. AEs leading to discontinuation of study therapy were also reported as safety assessment. Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Summaries of SAEs and AEs leading to discontinuation or withdrawal through Week 24 included AEs with onset on or after the start of study treatment (i.e. study date of first study treatment intake) up to and including the end of the Week 24 visit snapshot window.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Day 8 of the Monotherapy PeriodUp to Day 8 of the monotherapy periodPercentage of participants with plasma HIV 1 RNA \< 50 c/mL at Baseline of combination therapy was assessed to evaluate the antiviral activity of four doses of FTR. Baseline of combination therapy was the Day 1 of the combination therapy. Virologic success or failure was determined using the non-missing viral load value at Baseline of combination therapy. The assessment closest to the window target Study Day was used for the analysis. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Number of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Monotherapy PeriodUp to Day 8 of the monotherapy periodAny untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or suspected transmission of an infectious agent via the study drug were categorized as SAE. AEs leading to discontinuation of study therapy were also reported as safety assessment.
Change From Monotherapy Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD)4+ and CD8+ T-cell Counts During MonotherapyBaseline and Day 8Blood was collected and CD4+ and CD8+ cell count assessment was done by flow cytometery and was carried out at Baseline (Day 1) to evaluate the immunological activity of multiple doses of FTR. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment and the values are absolute values. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Change From Monotherapy Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell Proportion During MonotherapyBaseline and Day 8Blood was collected and CD4+ and CD8+ proportion assessment was done by flow cytometery and was carried out at Baseline (Day 1) to evaluate the immunological activity of multiple doses of FTR. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment and the values are absolute values. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Primary StudyWeeks 48 and 96Percentage of participants with plasma HIV 1 RNA \< 50 c/mL at Weeks 48 and 96 using the FDA snapshot algorithm was assessed to evaluate the antiviral activity. Treatment comparisons were not performed as this was an estimation study. Response rates were tabulated by treatment arm with exact Clopper-Pearson binomial 95 percentage CI. Virologic success or failure was determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA assessment while the participant was on-treatment within the snapshot window of the visit of interest.
Number of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudyWeeks 48 and 96Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or suspected transmission of an infectious agent via the study drug were categorized as SAE. AEs leading to discontinuation of study therapy were also reported as safety assessment. Safety Population comprised of participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Summaries of SAEs and AEs leading to discontinuation or withdrawal through Week X (where X = 48 or 96) included AEs with onset on or after the start of study treatment (i.e. study date of first study treatment intake) up to and including the end of the Week 48 and 96 visit snapshot window.
Change From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodBaseline and up to Day 8 of the monotherapy periodChange from monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA to assess the antiviral activity of temsavir following administration of selected doses of FTR administered orally to HIV-1-infected participants for 7 days. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. ITT-E Monotherapy Population comprised of participants that were randomized and participated in the monotherapy sub-study and received at least one dose of FTR Monotherapy. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Number of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24Up to Week 24Participants who administered antiretroviral (ARV) with virologic failure (VF) were assessed. Genotypic substitution included assessment of Reverse Transcriptase (RT) substitution, Protease Inhibitor (PI) substitution and Integrase RAL substitution as per International Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Society-USA (IAS-USA) list. ITT-E Resistance Tested through Week 24 population included participants who met the criteria for Resistance testing, and the confirmatory value or value at discontinuation occurred at or before the end of the Week 24 Snapshot analysis window. The criteria for resistance tested was participant who had virologic failure or met the following criteria a) Participants who achieved viral suppression (plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 c/mL) and have confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>= 400 c/mL at any time during the study. b) Participants who were discontinued before achieving viral suppression (plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 c/mL) after Week 8 with last plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=400 c/mL.
Number of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48Up to Week 48Participants who administered ARV with VF were assessed. Genotypic substitution included assessment of RT substitution, PI substitution and Integrase RAL substitution as per IAS-USA list. ITT-E Resistance Tested through Week 48 population included participants who met the criteria for Resistance testing, and the confirmatory value or value at discontinuation occurred at or before the end of the Week 48 Snapshot analysis window. The criteria for resistance tested was participant who had virologic failure or the following criteria a) Participants who achieved viral suppression (plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 c/mL) and have confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>= 400 c/mL at any time during the study. b) Participants who were discontinued before achieving viral suppression (plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 c/mL) after Week 8 with last plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=400 c/mL.
Number of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96Up to Week 96Participants who administered ARV with VF were assessed. Genotypic substitution included assessment of RT substitution, PI substitution and Integrase RAL substitution as per IAS-USA list. ITT-E Resistance Tested through Week 96 population included participants who met the criteria for Resistance testing, and the confirmatory value or value at discontinuation occurred at or before the end of the Week 96 Snapshot analysis window. The criteria for resistance tested was participants with virologic failure or the following criteria a) Participants who achieved viral suppression (plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 c/mL) and have confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>= 400 c/mL at any time during the study. b) Participants who were discontinued before achieving viral suppression (plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 c/mL) after Week 8 with last plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=400 c/mL.
Maximum Change From Baseline in Inhibitory Concentration at 50% (IC50) Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 24Baseline and up to Week 24Virologic failure is defined clinically as confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>= 50 copies/mL at Week 24 or later or virologic rebound defined as confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL at any time after prior confirmed suppression to \<50 copies/mL OR confirmed \>1 log10 copies/mL increase in HIV-1 RNA at any time above nadir level where nadir was \>= 50 copies/mL . The phenotypic resistance to a drug is defined as a fold change (i.e, ratio of the IC50 of the clinical isolate to the IC50 of the reference strain) greater than the cut-off for reduced susceptibility. Maximum change from Baseline in Temsavir IC50 fold change based on all on-treatment values has been presented. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment and those values are absolute values. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Change From Baseline in IC50 Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 48Baseline and up to Week 48Virologic failure is defined clinically as confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>= 50 copies/mL at Week 24 or later or later or virologic rebound defined as confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL at any time after prior confirmed suppression to \<50 copies/mL OR confirmed \>1 log10 copies/mL increase in HIV-1 RNA at any time above nadir level where nadir was \>= 50 copies/mL. The phenotypic resistance to a drug is defined as a fold change (i.e, ratio of the IC50 of the clinical isolate to the IC50 of the reference strain) greater than the cut-off for reduced susceptibility. Maximum change from Baseline in Temsavir IC50 fold change based on all on-treatment values has been presented. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment and those values are absolute values. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Change From Baseline in IC50 Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 96Baseline and up to Week 96Virologic failure is defined clinically as confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>= 50 copies/mL at Week 24 or later or virologic rebound defined as confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL at any time after prior confirmed suppression to \<50 copies/mL OR confirmed \>1 log10 copies/mL increase in HIV-1 RNA at any time above nadir level where nadir was \>= 50 copies/mL. The phenotypic resistance to a drug is defined as a fold change (i.e, ratio of the IC50 of the clinical isolate to the IC50 of the reference strain) greater than the cut-off for reduced susceptibility. Maximum change from Baseline in Temsavir IC50 fold change based on all on-treatment values has been presented. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment and those values are absolute values. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Change From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountBaseline and Weeks 24, 48 and 96Blood was collected and CD4+ cell count assessment by flow cytometery was carried out at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 24, 48 and 96 to evaluate the immunological activity of multiple doses of BMS-663068/GSK3684934. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment and those values are absolute values. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Maximum Decrease From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 Plasma HIV-1 RNABaseline and up to Day 8 of the monotherapy periodMaximum decrease from monotherapy Baseline in log10 plasma HIV-1 RNA during monotherapy to assess the antiviral activity of temsavir following administration of selected doses of FTR administered orally to HIV-1-infected participants for 7 days. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. The data for monotherapy nadir has been presented where nadir represents the maximum decrease from Baseline.

Countries

Argentina, Colombia, Germany, Mexico, Peru, Romania, Russia, South Africa, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV-1) were randomized in ratio of 1:1:1:1:1 to 5 treatment arms of the study. Four groups with distinct dose of Fostemsavir (FTR, also referred BMS-663068) with Raltegravir (RAL) Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF). There was a reference group with ritonavir (r) boosted atazanavir (ATV), RAL and TDF.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 581 participants were screened, 254 were enrolled of which 2 participants withdrew consent and 1 was randomized in error. A total 251 participants were randomized and treated of which 32 were in Monotherapy sub-study (only FTR) and continued to Primary study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDF
Participants were randomized and administered 400 mg FTR BID (double-blind) along with 400 mg RAL BID (open label) and 300 mg TDF once daily (QD) (open label).
50
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDF
Participants were randomized and administered 800 mg of FTR BID (double-blind) along with 400 mg RAL BID (open label) and 300 mg TDF QD (open label).
49
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDF
Participants were randomized and administered 600 mg of FTR QD (double-blind) along with 400 mg RAL BID (open label) and 300 mg TDF QD (open label).
51
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDF
Participants were randomized and administered 1200 mg of FTR QD along (double-blind) with 400 mg RAL BID (open label) and 300 mg TDF QD (open label).
50
ATV/r/RAL/TDF
Participants were randomized to Reference group (open label) and administered ATV/r 300/100 mg once daily along with 400 mg RAL BID and 300 mg TDF QD.
51
Total251

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdhesion problem00010
Overall StudyAdverse Event03027
Overall StudyAs per Exclusion criteria01000
Overall StudyContinuation criteria not met00110
Overall StudyDeath10100
Overall StudyEarly termination00001
Overall StudyInvestigator relocating02031
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy37442
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up53385
Overall StudyMissed End of treatment visit00010
Overall StudyNon-compliance with study drug12602
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10000
Overall StudyPregnancy01001
Overall StudyPrison00100
Overall StudySponsor terminated00001
Overall StudyUnable to come back for visit10110
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject55679

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFFTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFFTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFFTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFATV/r/RAL/TDFTotal
Age, Continuous38.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.17
38.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.49
40.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.45
39.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.41
39.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.63
39.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.84
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage
14 Participants15 Participants16 Participants18 Participants13 Participants76 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian Or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other/Mixed
16 Participants13 Participants17 Participants15 Participants14 Participants75 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
20 Participants19 Participants17 Participants16 Participants23 Participants95 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants21 Participants22 Participants16 Participants22 Participants100 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants28 Participants29 Participants34 Participants29 Participants151 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 2000 / 51
other
Total, other adverse events
163 / 20046 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
35 / 2008 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Discontinuation Due to AEs up to Week 24

Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or suspected transmission of an infectious agent via the study drug were categorized as SAE. AEs leading to discontinuation of study therapy were also reported as safety assessment. Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Summaries of SAEs and AEs leading to discontinuation or withdrawal through Week 24 included AEs with onset on or after the start of study treatment (i.e. study date of first study treatment intake) up to and including the end of the Week 24 visit snapshot window.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Discontinuation Due to AEs up to Week 24SAE3 Participants
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Discontinuation Due to AEs up to Week 24AEs leading to discontinuation1 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Discontinuation Due to AEs up to Week 24AEs leading to discontinuation2 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Discontinuation Due to AEs up to Week 24SAE4 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Discontinuation Due to AEs up to Week 24SAE4 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Discontinuation Due to AEs up to Week 24AEs leading to discontinuation0 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Discontinuation Due to AEs up to Week 24SAE2 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Discontinuation Due to AEs up to Week 24AEs leading to discontinuation1 Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Discontinuation Due to AEs up to Week 24AEs leading to discontinuation2 Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Discontinuation Due to AEs up to Week 24SAE5 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) < 50 Copies Per Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 24

Percentage of participants with plasma HIV 1 RNA \< 50 c/mL at Week 24 using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot algorithm was assessed to evaluate the antiviral activity. Treatment comparisons were not performed as this was an estimation study. Response rates were tabulated by treatment arm with exact Clopper-Pearson binomial 95 percentage confidence intervals (CI). Virologic success or failure was determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA assessment while the participant was on-treatment within the snapshot window of the visit of interest. Intent-To-Treat-Exposed (ITT-E) Population includes all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT-E Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) < 50 Copies Per Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 2480 Percentage of Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) < 50 Copies Per Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 2469 Percentage of Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) < 50 Copies Per Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 2476 Percentage of Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) < 50 Copies Per Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 2472 Percentage of Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) < 50 Copies Per Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 2475 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell Count

Blood was collected and CD4+ cell count assessment by flow cytometery was carried out at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 24, 48 and 96 to evaluate the immunological activity of multiple doses of BMS-663068/GSK3684934. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment and those values are absolute values. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24, 48 and 96

Population: ITT-E Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountWeek 48, n=43, 34, 43, 41, 41199.1 Cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 124.24
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountWeek 24, n=41, 38, 48, 42, 40134.3 Cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 84.63
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountWeek 96, n=42, 28, 35, 28, 31264.6 Cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 147.83
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountWeek 96, n=42, 28, 35, 28, 31210.8 Cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 158.03
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountWeek 24, n=41, 38, 48, 42, 40111.0 Cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 123.75
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountWeek 48, n=43, 34, 43, 41, 41158.7 Cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 118.7
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountWeek 24, n=41, 38, 48, 42, 40109.5 Cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 87.2
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountWeek 96, n=42, 28, 35, 28, 31175.7 Cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 98.28
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountWeek 48, n=43, 34, 43, 41, 41140.5 Cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 97.16
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountWeek 48, n=43, 34, 43, 41, 41155.4 Cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 107.06
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountWeek 96, n=42, 28, 35, 28, 31211.7 Cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 151.03
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountWeek 24, n=41, 38, 48, 42, 40124.5 Cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 111.04
ATV/r/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountWeek 96, n=42, 28, 35, 28, 31250.1 Cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 217.54
ATV/r/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountWeek 24, n=41, 38, 48, 42, 40119.4 Cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 142.85
ATV/r/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell CountWeek 48, n=43, 34, 43, 41, 41178.7 Cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 133.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in IC50 Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 48

Virologic failure is defined clinically as confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>= 50 copies/mL at Week 24 or later or later or virologic rebound defined as confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL at any time after prior confirmed suppression to \<50 copies/mL OR confirmed \>1 log10 copies/mL increase in HIV-1 RNA at any time above nadir level where nadir was \>= 50 copies/mL. The phenotypic resistance to a drug is defined as a fold change (i.e, ratio of the IC50 of the clinical isolate to the IC50 of the reference strain) greater than the cut-off for reduced susceptibility. Maximum change from Baseline in Temsavir IC50 fold change based on all on-treatment values has been presented. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment and those values are absolute values. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 48

Population: ITT-E Resistance Tested through Week 48 Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in IC50 Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 48-2.624 IC50 Fold ChangeStandard Deviation 3.2819
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in IC50 Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 48586.776 IC50 Fold ChangeStandard Deviation 1521.9126
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in IC50 Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 4881.729 IC50 Fold ChangeStandard Deviation 165.4931
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in IC50 Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 48449.092 IC50 Fold ChangeStandard Deviation 647.9828
Secondary

Change From Baseline in IC50 Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 96

Virologic failure is defined clinically as confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>= 50 copies/mL at Week 24 or later or virologic rebound defined as confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL at any time after prior confirmed suppression to \<50 copies/mL OR confirmed \>1 log10 copies/mL increase in HIV-1 RNA at any time above nadir level where nadir was \>= 50 copies/mL. The phenotypic resistance to a drug is defined as a fold change (i.e, ratio of the IC50 of the clinical isolate to the IC50 of the reference strain) greater than the cut-off for reduced susceptibility. Maximum change from Baseline in Temsavir IC50 fold change based on all on-treatment values has been presented. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment and those values are absolute values. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 96

Population: ITT-E Resistance Tested through Week 96 Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in IC50 Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 9625.480 IC50 Fold ChangeStandard Deviation 68.903
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in IC50 Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 96419.901 IC50 Fold ChangeStandard Deviation 1092.5929
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in IC50 Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 9646.351 IC50 Fold ChangeStandard Deviation 157.9219
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Baseline in IC50 Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 96777.818 IC50 Fold ChangeStandard Deviation 1550.8887
Secondary

Change From Monotherapy Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell Proportion During Monotherapy

Blood was collected and CD4+ and CD8+ proportion assessment was done by flow cytometery and was carried out at Baseline (Day 1) to evaluate the immunological activity of multiple doses of FTR. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment and the values are absolute values. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 8

Population: ITT-E Monotherapy Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell Proportion During MonotherapyCD4+-0.005 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 0.0084
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell Proportion During MonotherapyCD8+-0.003 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 0.0273
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell Proportion During MonotherapyCD8+-0.040 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 0.0245
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell Proportion During MonotherapyCD4+0.023 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 0.0299
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell Proportion During MonotherapyCD4+0.008 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 0.0335
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell Proportion During MonotherapyCD8+-0.009 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 0.0465
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell Proportion During MonotherapyCD4+0.014 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 0.032
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell Proportion During MonotherapyCD8+-0.021 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 0.0364
Secondary

Change From Monotherapy Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD)4+ and CD8+ T-cell Counts During Monotherapy

Blood was collected and CD4+ and CD8+ cell count assessment was done by flow cytometery and was carried out at Baseline (Day 1) to evaluate the immunological activity of multiple doses of FTR. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment and the values are absolute values. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 8

Population: ITT-E Monotherapy Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD)4+ and CD8+ T-cell Counts During MonotherapyCD4+58.4 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 81.6
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD)4+ and CD8+ T-cell Counts During MonotherapyCD8+134.2 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 180.64
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD)4+ and CD8+ T-cell Counts During MonotherapyCD8+216.3 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 215.57
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD)4+ and CD8+ T-cell Counts During MonotherapyCD4+134.8 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 25.7
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD)4+ and CD8+ T-cell Counts During MonotherapyCD4+71.8 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 117.68
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD)4+ and CD8+ T-cell Counts During MonotherapyCD8+188.0 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 363.58
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD)4+ and CD8+ T-cell Counts During MonotherapyCD4+63.4 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 100.86
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD)4+ and CD8+ T-cell Counts During MonotherapyCD8+67.6 cells per cubic millimeterStandard Deviation 236.55
Secondary

Change From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy Period

Change from monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA to assess the antiviral activity of temsavir following administration of selected doses of FTR administered orally to HIV-1-infected participants for 7 days. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. ITT-E Monotherapy Population comprised of participants that were randomized and participated in the monotherapy sub-study and received at least one dose of FTR Monotherapy. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

Time frame: Baseline and up to Day 8 of the monotherapy period

Population: ITT-E Monotherapy Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 2, n=7, 5, 10, 90.220 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.163
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 6, n=7, 5, 10, 10-0.530 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.317
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 7, n=6, 5, 10, 10-0.556 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.4264
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 8, n=6, 4, 9, 9-0.691 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.538
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 5, n=7, 4, 10, 10-0.340 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.3185
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 5, n=7, 4, 10, 10-0.811 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.3455
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 8, n=6, 4, 9, 9-1.372 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.3208
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 6, n=7, 5, 10, 10-1.082 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.3388
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 7, n=6, 5, 10, 10-1.443 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.4484
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 2, n=7, 5, 10, 90.149 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.182
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 7, n=6, 5, 10, 10-1.086 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.4216
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 8, n=6, 4, 9, 9-1.218 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.3902
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 5, n=7, 4, 10, 10-0.593 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.2429
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 2, n=7, 5, 10, 90.126 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.1811
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 6, n=7, 5, 10, 10-0.822 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.3076
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 8, n=6, 4, 9, 9-1.470 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.657
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 2, n=7, 5, 10, 90.126 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.4216
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 7, n=6, 5, 10, 10-1.198 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.6863
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 6, n=7, 5, 10, 10-1.053 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.7491
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFChange From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 HIV RNA of the Monotherapy PeriodDay 5, n=7, 4, 10, 10-0.767 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.6388
Secondary

Maximum Change From Baseline in Inhibitory Concentration at 50% (IC50) Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 24

Virologic failure is defined clinically as confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>= 50 copies/mL at Week 24 or later or virologic rebound defined as confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL at any time after prior confirmed suppression to \<50 copies/mL OR confirmed \>1 log10 copies/mL increase in HIV-1 RNA at any time above nadir level where nadir was \>= 50 copies/mL . The phenotypic resistance to a drug is defined as a fold change (i.e, ratio of the IC50 of the clinical isolate to the IC50 of the reference strain) greater than the cut-off for reduced susceptibility. Maximum change from Baseline in Temsavir IC50 fold change based on all on-treatment values has been presented. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment and those values are absolute values. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 24

Population: ITT-E Resistance Tested through Week 24 Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFMaximum Change From Baseline in Inhibitory Concentration at 50% (IC50) Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 24-2.350 IC50 Fold ChangeStandard Deviation 3.4536
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFMaximum Change From Baseline in Inhibitory Concentration at 50% (IC50) Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 241014.748 IC50 Fold ChangeStandard Deviation 2015.5876
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFMaximum Change From Baseline in Inhibitory Concentration at 50% (IC50) Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 24101.627 IC50 Fold ChangeStandard Deviation 190.4849
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFMaximum Change From Baseline in Inhibitory Concentration at 50% (IC50) Fold Change Among Participants With VF at Week 2439.030 IC50 Fold ChangeStandard Deviation 55.1119
Secondary

Maximum Decrease From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 Plasma HIV-1 RNA

Maximum decrease from monotherapy Baseline in log10 plasma HIV-1 RNA during monotherapy to assess the antiviral activity of temsavir following administration of selected doses of FTR administered orally to HIV-1-infected participants for 7 days. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the date of first dose of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. The data for monotherapy nadir has been presented where nadir represents the maximum decrease from Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Day 8 of the monotherapy period

Population: ITT-E Monotherapy Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFMaximum Decrease From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 Plasma HIV-1 RNA-0.770 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.4487
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFMaximum Decrease From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 Plasma HIV-1 RNA-1.524 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.3898
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFMaximum Decrease From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 Plasma HIV-1 RNA-1.250 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.3818
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFMaximum Decrease From Monotherapy Baseline in log10 Plasma HIV-1 RNA-1.399 log10 c/mLStandard Deviation 0.6688
Secondary

Number of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24

Participants who administered antiretroviral (ARV) with virologic failure (VF) were assessed. Genotypic substitution included assessment of Reverse Transcriptase (RT) substitution, Protease Inhibitor (PI) substitution and Integrase RAL substitution as per International Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Society-USA (IAS-USA) list. ITT-E Resistance Tested through Week 24 population included participants who met the criteria for Resistance testing, and the confirmatory value or value at discontinuation occurred at or before the end of the Week 24 Snapshot analysis window. The criteria for resistance tested was participant who had virologic failure or met the following criteria a) Participants who achieved viral suppression (plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 c/mL) and have confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>= 400 c/mL at any time during the study. b) Participants who were discontinued before achieving viral suppression (plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 c/mL) after Week 8 with last plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=400 c/mL.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: ITT-E Resistance Tested through Week 24 Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24Integrase substitution0 Participants
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24RT substitution0 Participants
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24PI substitution0 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24Integrase substitution0 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24PI substitution0 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24RT substitution0 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24RT substitution0 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24Integrase substitution1 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24PI substitution0 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24RT substitution1 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24Integrase substitution1 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24PI substitution0 Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24Integrase substitution0 Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24RT substitution0 Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 24PI substitution0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48

Participants who administered ARV with VF were assessed. Genotypic substitution included assessment of RT substitution, PI substitution and Integrase RAL substitution as per IAS-USA list. ITT-E Resistance Tested through Week 48 population included participants who met the criteria for Resistance testing, and the confirmatory value or value at discontinuation occurred at or before the end of the Week 48 Snapshot analysis window. The criteria for resistance tested was participant who had virologic failure or the following criteria a) Participants who achieved viral suppression (plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 c/mL) and have confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>= 400 c/mL at any time during the study. b) Participants who were discontinued before achieving viral suppression (plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 c/mL) after Week 8 with last plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=400 c/mL.

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: ITT-E Resistance Tested through Week 48 Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48PI substitution1 Participants
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48Integrase substitution1 Participants
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48RT substitution0 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48RT substitution0 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48PI substitution0 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48Integrase substitution1 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48RT substitution0 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48PI substitution0 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48Integrase substitution1 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48PI substitution1 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48Integrase substitution2 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48RT substitution2 Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48PI substitution0 Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48RT substitution0 Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 48Integrase substitution0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96

Participants who administered ARV with VF were assessed. Genotypic substitution included assessment of RT substitution, PI substitution and Integrase RAL substitution as per IAS-USA list. ITT-E Resistance Tested through Week 96 population included participants who met the criteria for Resistance testing, and the confirmatory value or value at discontinuation occurred at or before the end of the Week 96 Snapshot analysis window. The criteria for resistance tested was participants with virologic failure or the following criteria a) Participants who achieved viral suppression (plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 c/mL) and have confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>= 400 c/mL at any time during the study. b) Participants who were discontinued before achieving viral suppression (plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 c/mL) after Week 8 with last plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=400 c/mL.

Time frame: Up to Week 96

Population: ITT-E Resistance Tested through Week 96 Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96Integrase RAL substitution2 Participants
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96RT substitution2 Participants
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96PI substitution3 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96PI substitution1 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96Integrase RAL substitution2 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96RT substitution1 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96RT substitution2 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96PI substitution2 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96Integrase RAL substitution1 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96Integrase RAL substitution3 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96PI substitution2 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96RT substitution2 Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96Integrase RAL substitution0 Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96RT substitution1 Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With Newly-emergent Genotypic Substitutions at Week 96PI substitution0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Monotherapy Period

Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or suspected transmission of an infectious agent via the study drug were categorized as SAE. AEs leading to discontinuation of study therapy were also reported as safety assessment.

Time frame: Up to Day 8 of the monotherapy period

Population: ITT-E Monotherapy Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Monotherapy PeriodSAE0 Participants
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Monotherapy PeriodAEs leading to discontinuation0 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Monotherapy PeriodAEs leading to discontinuation0 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Monotherapy PeriodSAE0 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Monotherapy PeriodSAE0 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Monotherapy PeriodAEs leading to discontinuation0 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Monotherapy PeriodSAE0 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Monotherapy PeriodAEs leading to discontinuation0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary Study

Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or suspected transmission of an infectious agent via the study drug were categorized as SAE. AEs leading to discontinuation of study therapy were also reported as safety assessment. Safety Population comprised of participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Summaries of SAEs and AEs leading to discontinuation or withdrawal through Week X (where X = 48 or 96) included AEs with onset on or after the start of study treatment (i.e. study date of first study treatment intake) up to and including the end of the Week 48 and 96 visit snapshot window.

Time frame: Weeks 48 and 96

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudyAEs leading to discontinuation, Week 481 Participants
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudyAEs leading to discontinuation, Week 961 Participants
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudySAE, Week 483 Participants
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudySAE, Week 965 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudyAEs leading to discontinuation, Week 962 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudySAE, Week 485 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudyAEs leading to discontinuation, Week 482 Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudySAE, Week 967 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudyAEs leading to discontinuation, Week 960 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudyAEs leading to discontinuation, Week 480 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudySAE, Week 966 Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudySAE, Week 484 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudyAEs leading to discontinuation, Week 481 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudySAE, Week 482 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudyAEs leading to discontinuation, Week 962 Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudySAE, Week 964 Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudyAEs leading to discontinuation, Week 965 Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudyAEs leading to discontinuation, Week 483 Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudySAE, Week 967 Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFNumber of Participants With SAE and Discontinuation Due to AEs During Primary StudySAE, Week 485 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Day 8 of the Monotherapy Period

Percentage of participants with plasma HIV 1 RNA \< 50 c/mL at Baseline of combination therapy was assessed to evaluate the antiviral activity of four doses of FTR. Baseline of combination therapy was the Day 1 of the combination therapy. Virologic success or failure was determined using the non-missing viral load value at Baseline of combination therapy. The assessment closest to the window target Study Day was used for the analysis. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Time frame: Up to Day 8 of the monotherapy period

Population: ITT-E Monotherapy Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Day 8 of the Monotherapy Period0 Percentage of Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Day 8 of the Monotherapy Period0 Percentage of Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Day 8 of the Monotherapy Period0 Percentage of Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Day 8 of the Monotherapy Period11 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Primary Study

Percentage of participants with plasma HIV 1 RNA \< 50 c/mL at Weeks 48 and 96 using the FDA snapshot algorithm was assessed to evaluate the antiviral activity. Treatment comparisons were not performed as this was an estimation study. Response rates were tabulated by treatment arm with exact Clopper-Pearson binomial 95 percentage CI. Virologic success or failure was determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA assessment while the participant was on-treatment within the snapshot window of the visit of interest.

Time frame: Weeks 48 and 96

Population: ITT-E Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Primary StudyWeek 9678 Percentage of Participants
FTR 400 mg BID/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Primary StudyWeek 4882 Percentage of Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Primary StudyWeek 9649 Percentage of Participants
FTR 800 mg BID/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Primary StudyWeek 4861 Percentage of Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Primary StudyWeek 4869 Percentage of Participants
FTR 600 mg QD/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Primary StudyWeek 9663 Percentage of Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Primary StudyWeek 9658 Percentage of Participants
FTR 1200 mg QD/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Primary StudyWeek 4868 Percentage of Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Primary StudyWeek 4871 Percentage of Participants
ATV/r/RAL/TDFPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Primary StudyWeek 9657 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026