Skip to content

Distal Protection Device in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)

Distal Protection Device Did Not Improve Microvascular Obstruction Evaluated by Cardiac MR After Primary Percutaneous Intervention for ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01384019
Enrollment
126
Registered
2011-06-28
Start date
2004-01-31
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2013-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

ST-elevation myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, microvascular occlusion, myocardial salvage

Brief summary

The investigators examined the mechanism underlying the lack of benefit from distal protection and thrombus aspiration (DP-TA) in 126 patients with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in a prospective, randomized trial.

Detailed description

Patients with first-diagnosed STEMI were randomly assigned to distal protection and thrombus aspiration (DP-TA) pretreatment during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or conventional PCI (c-PCI). The primary endpoint was the remodeling index (RI), measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) post-PCI and 6 months after PCI. Secondary endpoints, determined by CMR within 3 to 5 days after PCI, included the infarct ratio (infarct size to entire left ventricular \[LV\] size ) by delayed-enhancement (DE), area at risk (AAR) ratio (AAR to LV size) by T2 high-signal intensity , microvascular occlusion index (MVO) ratio (MVO to LV size) by DE, and myocardial salvage index (MSI, \[AAR-infarct size\] x 100/AAR).

Interventions

DEVICEdistal protection and thrombus aspiration (The GuardWire Plus (Medtronic Inc.))

The GuardWire Plus (Medtronic Inc.): distal balloon occlusion and proximal thrombus aspiration

PROCEDUREc-PCI

conventional PCI without Guard wire

Sponsors

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 30 and less than 80 years presenting with STEMI * more than 30 minutes but less than 12 hours after symptom onset * with ≥ 2 mm of ST-segment elevation in 2 or more contiguous leads or with a presumably new left bundle-branch block * for whom primary PCI was intended

Exclusion criteria

* included thrombolytic therapy before PCI; * spontaneous restoration of coronary flow (\> TIMI grade II or III); * cardiogenic shock (Killip class IV); * major surgery or active bleeding within 6 weeks; * aspirin, thienopyridine, or heparin allergy; * neutropenia (\<1000 neutrophils/mm3), thrombocytopenia (\<100000 platelets/mm3), hepatic dysfunction, or renal insufficiency (serum creatinine level \>2.5 mg/dL \[221 μmol/L\]); * noncardiac condition with expected survival less than 1 year; * current participation in other investigations.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postinfarct Remodeling6 monthspostinfarct remodeling as evidenced by decreased left ventricular (LV) dilatation measured by CMR 6 months post PCI

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reperfusion Success3-5 daysmicrovascular obstruction, myocardial salvage, and infarct size measured using post-PCI CMR

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between Jan 24, 2004, and June 16, 2008, 550 patients with STEMI were screened.

Pre-assignment details

Among them, 126 patients were randomized to receive either PCI with distal protection (n=65) or PCI alone (n=61). Fifty five patients per each group received post-PCI CMR. Forty one patients underwent 6 month MRI in distal protection group and 43 patients, in conventional PCI group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DP-TA
distal protection and thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)
65
c-PCI
conventional PCI without DP-TA during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction
61
Total126

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyMRI refusal66
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDP-TAc-PCITotal
Age Continuous58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
65 participants61 participants126 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants13 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
52 Participants48 Participants100 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 650 / 61
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 657 / 61

Outcome results

Primary

Postinfarct Remodeling

postinfarct remodeling as evidenced by decreased left ventricular (LV) dilatation measured by CMR 6 months post PCI

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Forty one patients underwent 6 month CMR in distal protection group and 43 patients, in conventional PCI group.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DP-TAPostinfarct Remodeling11 Number of participants with remodeling
c-PCIPostinfarct Remodeling6 Number of participants with remodeling
Secondary

Reperfusion Success

microvascular obstruction, myocardial salvage, and infarct size measured using post-PCI CMR

Time frame: 3-5 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026