Skip to content

Study of Oral IXAZOMIB in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1/2 Study of the Oral Formulation of IXAZOMIB (MLN9708), Administered Twice-weekly in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Requiring Systemic Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01383928
Enrollment
64
Registered
2011-06-28
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2017-11-27
Last updated
2019-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in phase 1 and to determine the combined response rate of clinical response CR and very good partial response (VGPR) in phase 2 of oral (PO) ixazomib administered twice-weekly in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in a 21-day cycle in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDDM).

Detailed description

The drug being tested in this study is called ixazomib. Ixazomib was tested to slow disease progression and improve overall survival in participants who have newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). This study looked at the safety, tolerability and response in participants when administered in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone. The study enrolled 64 patients. Participants were assigned to one of the 3 treatment groups: * Phase 1 Ixazomib 3 mg * Phase 1 Ixazomib 3.7 mg * Phase 2 Ixazomib 3 mg All participants were administered with Ixazomib capsules, orally, twice-weekly on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 along with lenalidomide capsules, orally, once daily on Days 1-14 and dexamethasone, capsules, orally, once daily on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 for up to 16 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as induction therapy during Phase 1. Participants with stable or responding disease continued receiving ixazomib capsules, orally, twice weekly on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 in 21-day treatment cycles as maintenance therapy until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. This multi-center trial conducted in the United States. The overall time to participate in this study was 2037 days. Participants will make multiple visits to the clinic, and a final visit after 30 days after last dose of study drug for a follow-up assessment.

Interventions

DRUGIxazomib

Ixazomib capsules

DRUGLenalidomide

Lenalidomide capsules

DRUGDexamethasone

Dexamethasone Tablets

Sponsors

Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients 18 years or older * Symptomatic multiple myeloma or asymptomatic myeloma with myeloma-related organ damage diagnosed according to standard criteria * Measurable disease as specified in study protocol * Hematologic, liver, and renal function as specified in the study protocol. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2 * Female patients who are post menopausal, surgically sterile, or agree to practice 2 effective methods of contraception or agree to abstain from heterosexual intercourse; must also adhere to the guidelines of the lenalidomide pregnancy prevention program * Male patients who agree to practice effective barrier contraception or agree to abstain from heterosexual intercourse AND must adhere to the guidelines of the lenalidomide pregnancy prevention program * Must be able to take concurrent aspirin 325 mg daily * Voluntary written consent

Exclusion criteria

* Peripheral neuropathy that is greater or equal to Grade 2 * Female patients who are lactating or pregnant * Major surgery or radiotherapy within 14 days before the first dose of study drug * Uncontrolled infection requiring systematic antibiotics within 14 days before the first dose of study drug * Diarrhea (\> Grade 1) * Prior systemic therapy for multiple myeloma, including investigational drugs (prior treatment with corticosteroids or localized radiation therapy dose not disqualify the patient) * Systemic treatment with strong inhibitors of CYP1A2, strong inhibitors of CYP3A, or strong CYP3A inducers, or use of Ginkgo biloba or St. John's wort within 14 days before the first dose of study treatment * Central nervous system involvement * Diagnosis of smoldering multiple myeloma, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, POEMS syndrome, plasma cell leukemia, primary amyloidosis, myelodysplastic syndrome, or myeloproliferative syndrome * Evidence of current uncontrolled cardiovascular conditions * Prior or concurrent deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism * Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive, hepatitis B surface antigen-positive status, or known or suspected active hepatitis C infection * Serious medical or psychiatric illness that could, in the investigator's opinion, potentially interfere with the completion of treatment according to the protocol * Known allergy to any of the study medications * Known gastrointestinal condition or procedure that could interfere with swallowing or the oral absorption, or tolerance of IXAZOMIB * Diagnosed or treated for another malignancy within 2 years before the first dose or previously diagnosed with another malignancy and have any evidence of residual disease with the exception of nonmelanoma skin cancer or any completely resected carcinoma in situ

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)Cycle 1 (21 days)MTD was highest dose of ixazomib given with combination drugs, at which \<=1 of 6 participants experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during Cycle 1 of Phase 1. DLT defined as any of following considered possibly related to therapy: Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] \<500 cell per cubic millimeter \[cells/mm\^3\]) for \>7 days; Grade 3 neutropenia with fever or infection; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia for \>7 days; Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; platelet count \<10,000/mm\^3; Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy with pain or \>=Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; \>=Grade 3 nausea/emesis, diarrhea controlled by supportive therapy; any \>=Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity except Grade 3 arthralgia/myalgia; or \<1 week Grade 3 fatigue; delay in initiation of the subsequent therapy cycle by \>14 days; \<=80% lenalidomide doses administered due to other \>=Grade 2 combination study drug-related nonhematologic toxicities requiring therapy discontinuation.
Phase 1: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)Cycle 1 (21 days)The RP2D of ixazomib was determined after the evaluation of the available data from the phase 1 portion of the trial which included, but was not limited to analyses of efficacy results, toxicity characterization, all grades peripheral neuropathy, and treatment discontinuation. The maximum number of cycles received was 83 cycles (approximately up to 2037 days).
Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Experiencing 1 or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
Phase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)Laboratory tests included chemistry, hematology and urinalysis. Abnormal laboratory value was assessed as an AE if the value lead to discontinuation or delay in treatment, dose modification, therapeutic intervention, or was considered by the investigator to be a clinically significant change from baseline. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
Phase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to NeurotoxicityBaseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)TEAE related to neurotoxicity grading based on common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTACE) version 4.03 are reported. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; within normal limits, Grade 3= severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death. Only TEAEs related to neurotoxicity with values are reported.
Phase 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital SignsBaseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)Vital signs included body temperature, blood pressure and heart rate.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)CR as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform criteria is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR as per IMWG criteria is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \<100 mg per 24 hours. VGPR was applicable only to participants who had measurable disease defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements: Serum M-protein greater than or equal to (\>=)1 g/dL; Urine M-protein \>=200 mg/24 hours; Serum FLC assay level \>=10 mg/dL, provided serum FLC ratio was abnormal.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse EventsBaseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. As per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE), Grade 3 = AE with severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = AE with life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated and Grade 5 = Death related to AE.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse EventsBaseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Resulting in Study Drug DiscontinuationBaseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Near Complete Response (nCR)Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)nCR as per IMWG criteria is positive immunofixation analysis of serum or urine as the only evidence of disease; appearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<=5% plasma cells in bone marrow.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Partial Response (PR)Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)PR as per IMWG criteria is 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hr urinary M-protein by 90% or to \<200 mg per 24 hours.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Minimal Response (MR)Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)MR as per IMWG criteria is 25%-49% reduction in serum paraprotein and 50%-89% reduction in urine light chain excretion for 6 weeks.
Phase 2: Time to ResponseBaseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)Time to first response is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of a confirmed response (PR or better) in a participant who responded + 1 day. PR as per IMWG criteria is 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-h urinary M-protein by 90% or to \<200 mg per 24 hours.
Phase 1: Rac: Accumulation Ratio of IxazomibCycle 1, Days 1 and 11The accumulation ratio (Rac) was estimated as the ratio of AUC (0-72) on Day 11 to the AUC (0-72) on Day 1. AUC (0-72) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 72 hours post-dose for ixazomib.
Time to Disease Progression (TTP)Baseline up to a follow-up of 62.1 monthsTime to progression was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of PD + 1 day. Participants that did not experience PD will be censored at the last response assessment that is SD or better. PD: \>=25% increase from lowest value in:serum/urine M-component; difference between involved, uninvolved FLC levels; bone marrow plasma cell percent; new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas development/existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas size rise; hypercalcaemia development. SD: not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR, or PD. Participants that received Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) or an alternate cancer therapy were also be censored at the last response assessment that is, SD or better prior to initiation of therapy. Participants without response assessment will be censored at the date of first dose. TTP was analyzed using standard survival analysis techniques based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Baseline up to a follow-up of 62.1 monthsPFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of progressive disease or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first plus 1. PD: \>=25% increase from lowest value in:serum/urine M-component; difference between involved,uninvolved FLC levels; bone marrow plasma cell percent; new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas development/existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas size rise; hypercalcaemia development. SD: not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR, or PD. Participants who received ASCT or an alternate anticancer therapy were censored at the last response assessment that was SD or better before initiation of therapy. Participants without a response assessment were censored at the date of first dose. PFS was analyzed using standard survival analysis techniques based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Achieving Survival at Year 11 year after the first dose of study treatmentThe Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants surviving at Year 1.
Overall SurvivalBaseline up to a follow-up of 62.1 monthsOverall survival was measured as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the time of death plus 1 day. For participants who did not die, survival was censored at the date of last contact. Overall Survival was analyzed using standard survival analysis techniques based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)DOR was measured as the time from the date of first documentation of a confirmed response to the date of first documented PD. PD is defined as \>=25% increase from lowest value in: serum/urine M-component; difference between involved, uninvolved FLC levels; bone marrow plasma cell percent; development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas development or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; hypercalcaemia development.
Phase 1: Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration for IxazomibCycle 1, Days 1 and 11Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) is the peak plasma concentration of ixazomib, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve.
Phase 1: AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for IxazomibCycle 1, Days 1 and 11AUC(0-72) is a measure of the area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to 72 hours post-dose for ixazomib.
Phase 1: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for IxazomibCycle 1, Days 1 and 11Tmax: Time to reach the first maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), equal to time (hours) to Cmax of ixazomib after administration, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve.
Phase 1: Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseBaseline until end of study treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 83 - approximately 2037 days)CR as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform criteria is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. Partial response(PR):\>=50% reduction of serum M-protein,urinary M-protein by \>=90%/to \<200 mg/24 hr reduction.Near CR(nCR):positive immunofixation of serum/urine;soft tissue plasmacytomas disappearance;\<=5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR as per IMWG criteria is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \<100 mg per 24 hours. VGPR was applicable only to participants who had measurable disease defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements: Serum M-protein greater than or equal to (\>=)1 g/dL; Urine M-protein \>=200 mg/24 hours; Serum FLC assay level \>=10 mg/dL, provided serum FLC ratio was abnormal.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (CR+VGPR+PR)Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)Overall response is defined as CR, VGPR or PR based on IMWG Response Criteria for malignant lymphoma. CR: disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. VGPR: serum, urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or \>=90% reduction in serum M-protein+urine M-protein level \<100 mg/24h. Partial response (PR) is a minimum of 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses and no increase in the size of other nodes.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) After Cycles 4, 8, and 16Cycles 4, 8, and 16CR as per IMWG criteria is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR as per IMWG criteria is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \<100 mg per 24 hours. VGPR were applicable only to participants who had measurable disease defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements: Serum M-protein; Urine M-protein; Serum FLC assay.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR)Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)CR as per IMWG criteria is negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)sCR as per IMWG criteria is CR plus normal FLC ratio and absence of clonal cells in bone marrow. CR is negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)VGPR as per IMWG criteria is serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or \>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \<100 mg per 24 hours.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 15 investigative sites in the United States from 31 October 2011 to 27 November 2017 when the sponsor closed the study.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were enrolled in 1 of the 2 dose escalation treatment arms in Phase 1: ixazomib 3 mg and 3.7 mg induction followed by maintenance. Phase 2 consisted of ixazomib 3 mg during induction followed by maintenance.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3 mg
Ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, twice-weekly on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11, lenalidomide 25 mg, capsules, orally, once daily on Days 1-14, dexamethasone 20 mg, capsules, orally, once daily on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 in Cycle 1-8 and dexamethasone 10 mg, capsules, orally, once daily on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 in Cycle 9-16 in 21-day treatment cycles for up to 16 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as induction therapy during Phase 1. Participants with stable or responding disease continued receiving ixazomib (MLN9708) orally, twice weekly on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 in 21-day treatment cycles as maintenance therapy at the dose tolerated at the end of induction until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The maximum number of cycles received was 83 cycles (approximately up to 2037 days).
7
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mg
Ixazomib (MLN9708) 3.7 mg, capsules, orally, twice-weekly on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11, lenalidomide 25 mg, capsules, orally, once daily on Days 1-14, dexamethasone 20 mg, capsules, orally, once daily on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 in Cycle 1-8 and dexamethasone 10 mg, capsules, orally, once daily on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 in Cycle 9-16 in 21-day treatment cycles for up to 16 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as induction therapy during Phase 1. Participants with stable or responding disease continued receiving ixazomib (MLN9708) orally, twice weekly on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 in 21-day treatment cycles as maintenance therapy at the dose tolerated at the end of induction until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The maximum number of cycles received in this cohort was 25 cycles (approximately 585 days).
7
Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg
Ixazomib 3 mg (MLN9708), capsules, orally, twice-weekly on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11, lenalidomide 25 mg capsules, orally, once daily on Days 1-14, dexamethasone 20 mg, capsules, orally, once daily on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12 in Cycle 1-8 and dexamethasone 10 mg, capsules, orally, once daily on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12 in Cycle 9-16 in 21-day treatment cycles for up to 16 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as induction therapy during Phase 2. Participants with stable or responding disease continued receiving ixazomib (MLN9708) orally, twice weekly on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 in 21-day treatment cycles as maintenance therapy at the dose tolerated at the end of induction until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The maximum number of cycles received in this cohort was 74 cycles (approximately 1875 days).
50
Total64

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event128
Overall StudyInitiation of ASCT2118
Overall StudyOther134
Overall StudyProgressive Disease115
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory Therapeutic Response001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject004

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPhase 1: Ixazomib 3 mgTotalPhase 2: Ixazomib 3 mgPhase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mg
Age, Continuous64.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.04
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.82
61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.03
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
Body Surface Area (BSA)2.109 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2192
1.975 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.239
1.958 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2373
1.960 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2657
Corrected Calcium9.83 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.275
9.96 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.583
10.01 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.617
9.79 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.561
Creatinine Clearance Category
30 - 60 mL/min
2 Participants12 Participants8 Participants2 Participants
Creatinine Clearance Category
>60 mL/min
5 Participants52 Participants42 Participants5 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
0
3 Participants35 Participants27 Participants5 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
1
4 Participants26 Participants21 Participants1 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
2
0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Height171.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.09
171.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.43
171.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
170.9 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
Hemoglobin103.4 gram per liter (g/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.59
108.6 gram per liter (g/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.32
108.9 gram per liter (g/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.36
112.0 gram per liter (g/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.42
Participants with Extramedullary Plasmacytomas
Not Reported
4 Participants36 Participants28 Participants4 Participants
Participants with Extramedullary Plasmacytomas
Plasmacytomas Not Present
2 Participants8 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Participants with Extramedullary Plasmacytomas
Plasmacytomas Present
1 Participants20 Participants18 Participants1 Participants
Participants with Lytic Bone Lesions Present
Indeterminate
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Participants with Lytic Bone Lesions Present
Missing
1 Participants8 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Participants with Lytic Bone Lesions Present
Not Present
1 Participants10 Participants7 Participants2 Participants
Participants with Lytic Bone Lesions Present
Present
5 Participants45 Participants37 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants8 Participants7 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants62 Participants48 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
5 Participants54 Participants42 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 Participants64 Participants50 Participants7 Participants
Serum Creatinine Category
Greater than (>) 2 mg/dL
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Serum Creatinine Category
Less than or equal to (<=) 2 mg/dL
7 Participants64 Participants50 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants24 Participants19 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants40 Participants31 Participants4 Participants
Type of Myeloma
Biclonal
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Type of Myeloma
IgA Kappa
1 Participants12 Participants10 Participants1 Participants
Type of Myeloma
IgA Lambda
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Type of Myeloma
IgG Kappa
2 Participants29 Participants24 Participants3 Participants
Type of Myeloma
IgG Lambda
1 Participants9 Participants7 Participants1 Participants
Type of Myeloma
Kappa Free Light Chains
1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Type of Myeloma
Lambda Free Light Chains
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Type of Myeloma
Unknown
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Weight94.29 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.083
82.80 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.228
81.22 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.701
82.56 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.295

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 71 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 77 / 750 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 72 / 723 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

MTD was highest dose of ixazomib given with combination drugs, at which \<=1 of 6 participants experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during Cycle 1 of Phase 1. DLT defined as any of following considered possibly related to therapy: Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] \<500 cell per cubic millimeter \[cells/mm\^3\]) for \>7 days; Grade 3 neutropenia with fever or infection; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia for \>7 days; Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; platelet count \<10,000/mm\^3; Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy with pain or \>=Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; \>=Grade 3 nausea/emesis, diarrhea controlled by supportive therapy; any \>=Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity except Grade 3 arthralgia/myalgia; or \<1 week Grade 3 fatigue; delay in initiation of the subsequent therapy cycle by \>14 days; \<=80% lenalidomide doses administered due to other \>=Grade 2 combination study drug-related nonhematologic toxicities requiring therapy discontinuation.

Time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)

Population: DLT-evaluable population included all participants who received all Cycle 1 doses of MLN9708 and completed Cycle 1 procedures, or experienced a DLT in Cycle 1 in Phase 1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)3.7 mg
Primary

Phase 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs

Vital signs included body temperature, blood pressure and heart rate.

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital SignsBradycardia1 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital SignsPyrexia1 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital SignsOrthostatic hypotension0 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital SignsHypotension1 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital SignsHypotension1 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital SignsPyrexia3 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital SignsBradycardia0 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital SignsOrthostatic hypotension1 Participants
Primary

Phase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Laboratory tests included chemistry, hematology and urinalysis. Abnormal laboratory value was assessed as an AE if the value lead to discontinuation or delay in treatment, dose modification, therapeutic intervention, or was considered by the investigator to be a clinically significant change from baseline. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug and reported baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Aspartate aminotransferase increased0 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Eosinophilia0 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood bicarbonate decreased1 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypokalaemia1 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Shift to the left0 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperkalaemia1 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Anaemia1 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperglycaemia4 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood creatinine increased2 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyponatraemia0 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Neutropenia1 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypomagnesaemia0 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Platelet count decreased1 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperchloraemia1 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Thrombocytopenia1 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Iron deficiency anaemia1 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Alanine aminotransferase increased0 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Iron deficiency anaemia0 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Alanine aminotransferase increased3 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Aspartate aminotransferase increased2 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood creatinine increased0 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Shift to the left1 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Platelet count decreased0 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Blood bicarbonate decreased0 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Anaemia0 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Neutropenia0 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Thrombocytopenia1 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Eosinophilia1 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypokalaemia0 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperkalaemia0 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperglycaemia0 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyponatraemia1 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hypomagnesaemia2 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Hyperchloraemia0 Participants
Primary

Phase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to Neurotoxicity

TEAE related to neurotoxicity grading based on common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTACE) version 4.03 are reported. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; within normal limits, Grade 3= severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death. Only TEAEs related to neurotoxicity with values are reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug and reported baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to NeurotoxicityNeuropathy Peripheral (Grade 3)0 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to NeurotoxicityPeripheral Sensory Neuropathy (Grade 2)0 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to NeurotoxicityNeuropathy Peripheral (Grade 2)2 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to NeurotoxicityPeripheral Sensory Neuropathy (Grade 3)1 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to NeurotoxicityPeripheral Sensory Neuropathy (Grade 1)2 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to NeurotoxicityPeripheral Motor Neuropathy (Grade 1)1 Participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to NeurotoxicityNeuropathy Peripheral (Grade 1)0 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to NeurotoxicityPeripheral Motor Neuropathy (Grade 1)0 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to NeurotoxicityNeuropathy Peripheral (Grade 1)1 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to NeurotoxicityNeuropathy Peripheral (Grade 2)1 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to NeurotoxicityNeuropathy Peripheral (Grade 3)1 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to NeurotoxicityPeripheral Sensory Neuropathy (Grade 1)1 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to NeurotoxicityPeripheral Sensory Neuropathy (Grade 2)1 Participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to NeurotoxicityPeripheral Sensory Neuropathy (Grade 3)0 Participants
Primary

Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Experiencing 1 or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Percentage of Participants Experiencing 1 or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Adverse Event100 percentage of participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Percentage of Participants Experiencing 1 or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious Adverse Event71 percentage of participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Percentage of Participants Experiencing 1 or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Adverse Event100 percentage of participants
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Percentage of Participants Experiencing 1 or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious Adverse Event29 percentage of participants
Primary

Phase 1: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)

The RP2D of ixazomib was determined after the evaluation of the available data from the phase 1 portion of the trial which included, but was not limited to analyses of efficacy results, toxicity characterization, all grades peripheral neuropathy, and treatment discontinuation. The maximum number of cycles received was 83 cycles (approximately up to 2037 days).

Time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)3 mg
Primary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events

A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event.

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events46 percentage of participants
Primary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)

CR as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform criteria is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR as per IMWG criteria is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \<100 mg per 24 hours. VGPR was applicable only to participants who had measurable disease defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements: Serum M-protein greater than or equal to (\>=)1 g/dL; Urine M-protein \>=200 mg/24 hours; Serum FLC assay level \>=10 mg/dL, provided serum FLC ratio was abnormal.

Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Population: Response-evaluable population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had measurable disease at baseline, and at least 1 post-baseline response assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)65 percentage of participants
Primary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. As per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE), Grade 3 = AE with severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = AE with life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated and Grade 5 = Death related to AE.

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events74 percentage of participants
Primary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Resulting in Study Drug Discontinuation

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Resulting in Study Drug Discontinuation14 percentage of participants
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Achieving Survival at Year 1

The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants surviving at Year 1.

Time frame: 1 year after the first dose of study treatment

Population: mITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug in Phase 2 or who received at least 1 dose of any study drug and were treated at the phase 2 dose level during Phase 1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Achieving Survival at Year 194 percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival was measured as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the time of death plus 1 day. For participants who did not die, survival was censored at the date of last contact. Overall Survival was analyzed using standard survival analysis techniques based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Time frame: Baseline up to a follow-up of 62.1 months

Population: mITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug in Phase 2 or who received at least 1 dose of any study drug and were treated at the phase 2 dose level during Phase 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsOverall SurvivalNA months
Secondary

Phase 1: AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib

AUC(0-72) is a measure of the area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to 72 hours post-dose for ixazomib.

Time frame: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11

Population: PK analysis population included all participants, who had sufficient dosing data and ixazomib concentration-time data to permit calculation of PK parameters where Days 1 and 11 assessments were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for IxazomibDay 1315.450 hour*nanogram per milliliter (hr*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 75.0886
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for IxazomibDay 111105.44 hour*nanogram per milliliter (hr*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 457.5939
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for IxazomibDay 1284.576 hour*nanogram per milliliter (hr*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 47.8233
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for IxazomibDay 111023.52 hour*nanogram per milliliter (hr*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 284.3709
Secondary

Phase 1: Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) is the peak plasma concentration of ixazomib, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve.

Time frame: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis population included all participants who had sufficient dosing data and ixazomib concentration-time data to permit calculation of PK parameters where Days 1 and 11 assessments were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration for IxazomibDay 133.515 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 22.9634
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration for IxazomibDay 1158.674 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 19.9559
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration for IxazomibDay 146.946 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 26.6436
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration for IxazomibDay 1151.832 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 23.5112
Secondary

Phase 1: Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response

CR as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform criteria is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. Partial response(PR):\>=50% reduction of serum M-protein,urinary M-protein by \>=90%/to \<200 mg/24 hr reduction.Near CR(nCR):positive immunofixation of serum/urine;soft tissue plasmacytomas disappearance;\<=5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR as per IMWG criteria is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \<100 mg per 24 hours. VGPR was applicable only to participants who had measurable disease defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements: Serum M-protein greater than or equal to (\>=)1 g/dL; Urine M-protein \>=200 mg/24 hours; Serum FLC assay level \>=10 mg/dL, provided serum FLC ratio was abnormal.

Time frame: Baseline until end of study treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 83 - approximately 2037 days)

Population: Response-evaluable population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of ixazomib, had measurable disease at baseline, and at least 1 post-baseline disease assessment. Results were summarized together for all Phase 1 participants, as per planned analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response92 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 1: Rac: Accumulation Ratio of Ixazomib

The accumulation ratio (Rac) was estimated as the ratio of AUC (0-72) on Day 11 to the AUC (0-72) on Day 1. AUC (0-72) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 72 hours post-dose for ixazomib.

Time frame: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11

Population: PK analysis population included all participants, who had sufficient dosing data and ixazomib concentration-time data to permit calculation of PK parameters where Days 1 and 11 assessments were available.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Rac: Accumulation Ratio of Ixazomib3.785 ratioStandard Deviation 1.4653
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Rac: Accumulation Ratio of Ixazomib3.967 ratioStandard Deviation 0.7546
Secondary

Phase 1: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib

Tmax: Time to reach the first maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), equal to time (hours) to Cmax of ixazomib after administration, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve.

Time frame: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11

Population: PK analysis population included all participants, who had sufficient dosing data and ixazomib concentration-time data to permit calculation of PK parameters where Days 1 and 11 assessments were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for IxazomibDay 11.035 hours
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 1: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for IxazomibDay 111.030 hours
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for IxazomibDay 11.000 hours
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.7 mgPhase 1: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for IxazomibDay 110.984 hours
Secondary

Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was measured as the time from the date of first documentation of a confirmed response to the date of first documented PD. PD is defined as \>=25% increase from lowest value in: serum/urine M-component; difference between involved, uninvolved FLC levels; bone marrow plasma cell percent; development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas development or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; hypercalcaemia development.

Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Population: Included a subset of response-evaluable population who achieved response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)29.0 months
Secondary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR)

CR as per IMWG criteria is negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow.

Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Population: Response-evaluable population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of ixazomib, had measurable disease at baseline, and at least 1 post-baseline disease assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR)29 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) After Cycles 4, 8, and 16

CR as per IMWG criteria is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR as per IMWG criteria is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \<100 mg per 24 hours. VGPR were applicable only to participants who had measurable disease defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements: Serum M-protein; Urine M-protein; Serum FLC assay.

Time frame: Cycles 4, 8, and 16

Population: Response-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one 1 dose of ixazomib, had measurable disease at baseline, and at least one 1 post-baseline disease assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) After Cycles 4, 8, and 16After 4 cycles49 percentage of participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) After Cycles 4, 8, and 16After 8 cycles64 percentage of participants
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) After Cycles 4, 8, and 16After 16 cycles92 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Minimal Response (MR)

MR as per IMWG criteria is 25%-49% reduction in serum paraprotein and 50%-89% reduction in urine light chain excretion for 6 weeks.

Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Population: Response-evaluable population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of ixazomib, had measurable disease at baseline, and at least 1 post-baseline disease assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Minimal Response (MR)6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Near Complete Response (nCR)

nCR as per IMWG criteria is positive immunofixation analysis of serum or urine as the only evidence of disease; appearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<=5% plasma cells in bone marrow.

Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Population: Response-evaluable population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of ixazomib, had measurable disease at baseline, and at least 1 post-baseline disease assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Near Complete Response (nCR)10 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (CR+VGPR+PR)

Overall response is defined as CR, VGPR or PR based on IMWG Response Criteria for malignant lymphoma. CR: disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. VGPR: serum, urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or \>=90% reduction in serum M-protein+urine M-protein level \<100 mg/24h. Partial response (PR) is a minimum of 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses and no increase in the size of other nodes.

Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Population: Response-evaluable population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of ixazomib, had measurable disease at baseline, and at least 1 post-baseline disease assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (CR+VGPR+PR)94 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Partial Response (PR)

PR as per IMWG criteria is 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hr urinary M-protein by 90% or to \<200 mg per 24 hours.

Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Population: Response-evaluable population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of ixazomib, had measurable disease at baseline, and at least 1 post-baseline disease assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Partial Response (PR)65 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)

sCR as per IMWG criteria is CR plus normal FLC ratio and absence of clonal cells in bone marrow. CR is negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow.

Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Population: Response-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one 1 dose of ixazomib, had measurable disease at baseline, and at least one 1 post-baseline disease assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)22 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)

VGPR as per IMWG criteria is serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or \>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \<100 mg per 24 hours.

Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Population: Response-evaluable population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of ixazomib, had measurable disease at baseline, and at least 1 post-baseline disease assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)37 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2: Time to Response

Time to first response is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of a confirmed response (PR or better) in a participant who responded + 1 day. PR as per IMWG criteria is 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-h urinary M-protein by 90% or to \<200 mg per 24 hours.

Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)

Population: Response-evaluable population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had measurable disease at baseline, and at least 1 post-baseline response assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsPhase 2: Time to Response0.72 months
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of progressive disease or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first plus 1. PD: \>=25% increase from lowest value in:serum/urine M-component; difference between involved,uninvolved FLC levels; bone marrow plasma cell percent; new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas development/existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas size rise; hypercalcaemia development. SD: not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR, or PD. Participants who received ASCT or an alternate anticancer therapy were censored at the last response assessment that was SD or better before initiation of therapy. Participants without a response assessment were censored at the date of first dose. PFS was analyzed using standard survival analysis techniques based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Time frame: Baseline up to a follow-up of 62.1 months

Population: mITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug in Phase 2 or who received at least 1 dose of any study drug and were treated at the phase 2 dose level during Phase 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsProgression Free Survival (PFS)29.7 months
Secondary

Time to Disease Progression (TTP)

Time to progression was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of PD + 1 day. Participants that did not experience PD will be censored at the last response assessment that is SD or better. PD: \>=25% increase from lowest value in:serum/urine M-component; difference between involved, uninvolved FLC levels; bone marrow plasma cell percent; new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas development/existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas size rise; hypercalcaemia development. SD: not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR, or PD. Participants that received Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) or an alternate cancer therapy were also be censored at the last response assessment that is, SD or better prior to initiation of therapy. Participants without response assessment will be censored at the date of first dose. TTP was analyzed using standard survival analysis techniques based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Time frame: Baseline up to a follow-up of 62.1 months

Population: modified-intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug in Phase 2 or who received at least 1 dose of any study drug and were treated at the phase 2 dose level during Phase 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: All ParticipantsTime to Disease Progression (TTP)29.7 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026