Skip to content

Comparison of the Bioavailability of Metformin Between Medium Dose Linagliptin/Metformin Tablets and Medium Dose Glucophage Tablet Given With Linagliptin Tablet

A Single Dose Comparative Bioavailability Study of Linagliptin/Metformin hydrochloride2.5mg/500mg Combination Tablets Versus Linagliptin 2.5mg Tablets Administered With Glucophage 500mg Tablets Under Fasting Conditions

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01383356
Enrollment
58
Registered
2011-06-28
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2014-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

The data from this study will be used to compare the kinetic profile of metformin 500mg in linagliptin/metformin fixed dose combination tablet versus Canadian metformin reference product administered concomitantly with linagliptin 2.5 mg tablet.

Interventions

DRUGMetformin Single Tablet

Metformin medium doseTablet

DRUGLinagliptin/Metformin Combo

Fixed dose combination

DRUGLinagliptin Single Tablet

Linagliptin Single medium dose Tablet

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1\. Healthy male and female subjects.

Exclusion criteria

1\. Any relevant deviation from healthy conditions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)Prior to drug administration and at 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.33, 1.67, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, and 36 hours post dose in each treatment periodMaximum measured concentration of metformin in plasma, per period.
Area Under the Curve 0 to Last Measurable Value (AUC0-t)Prior to drug administration and at 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.33, 1.67, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, and 36 hours post dose in each treatment periodAUC0-t is the area under the concentration versus time curve of metformin in plasma, from time zero (0) to the time of the last measurable analyte concentration (t), as calculated by the linear trapezoidal method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under the Curve 0 to Inf (AUC0-inf)Prior to drug administration and at 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.33, 1.67, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, and 36 hours post dose in each treatment periodAUC0-inf is the area under the concentration versus time curve of metformin in plasma from time zero extrapolated to infinity.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

18 subjects were enrolled in the original study (June 2011 to July 2011) and 40 in the add-on study (November 2011 to December 2011) which was an option provided by protocol to increase the subject number. As no significant STUDY and STUDY-by-TREATMENT effect was revealed in analysis of pooled data, final analysis was performed on pooled data.

Pre-assignment details

This is a 2 period, 2 sequence, 2 treatment crossover. Subjects were randomized to one of the two sequences AB or BA. The duration of washout was at least 35 days between dosing.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Entire Study Population
Total number of subjects randomised and treated in the study.
58
Total58

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Period 1Adverse Event53
Period 1Non-compliance30
Period 1Out of Range Mid-study-Test01
Period 1Personal02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEntire Study Population
Age, Continuous35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 5221 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 520 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Area Under the Curve 0 to Last Measurable Value (AUC0-t)

AUC0-t is the area under the concentration versus time curve of metformin in plasma, from time zero (0) to the time of the last measurable analyte concentration (t), as calculated by the linear trapezoidal method.

Time frame: Prior to drug administration and at 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.33, 1.67, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, and 36 hours post dose in each treatment period

Population: All subjects having all samples in all periods and subjects who missed samples that may not affect the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters in any period

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lina/Met 2.5mg/500mgArea Under the Curve 0 to Last Measurable Value (AUC0-t)7079.65 ng*h/mlStandard Deviation 1688.14
Lina 2.5mg Plus Met 500mgArea Under the Curve 0 to Last Measurable Value (AUC0-t)6808.27 ng*h/mlStandard Deviation 1708.2
Comparison: The two formulations are shown to be bioequivalent if the 90 percent confidence interval of geometric mean ratio is entirely contained within the 80 to125 percent range both on measured data (statistical analysis 1) and potency corrected data (percent potency of label claim) (statistical analysis 2). ANOVA was applied to log-transformed AUC0-t and included study, subject-within-study, period-within-study, treatment and study-by-treatment interaction.90% CI: [101, 108]
Comparison: ANOVA was applied to log-transformed AUC0-t and included study, subject-within-study, period-within-study, treatment and study-by-treatment interaction. Results were potency corrected (GMR multiplied by the quotient of DP of Met in single tablet and DP of Met in combination tablet).90% CI: [105, 112]
Primary

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Maximum measured concentration of metformin in plasma, per period.

Time frame: Prior to drug administration and at 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.33, 1.67, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, and 36 hours post dose in each treatment period

Population: All subjects having all samples in all periods and subjects who missed samples that may not affect the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters in any period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lina/Met 2.5mg/500mgMaximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)901.82 ng/mlStandard Deviation 262.45
Lina 2.5mg Plus Met 500mgMaximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)770.52 ng/mlStandard Deviation 189.44
Comparison: The two formulations are shown to be bioequivalent if the geometric mean ratio is contained within the 80 to 125 percent range both on measured data (statistical analysis 1) and on potency corrected data (percent potency of label claim) (statistical analysis 2). ANOVA was applied to log-transformed Cmax and included study, subject-within-study, period-within-study, treatment and study-by-treatment interaction.90% CI: [111, 125]
Comparison: ANOVA was applied to log-transformed Cmax and included study, subject-within-study, period-within-study, treatment and study-by-treatment interaction. Results were potency corrected (GMR multiplied by the quotient of drug potency (DP) of Met in single tablet and DP of Met in combination tablet).90% CI: [114, 130]
Secondary

Area Under the Curve 0 to Inf (AUC0-inf)

AUC0-inf is the area under the concentration versus time curve of metformin in plasma from time zero extrapolated to infinity.

Time frame: Prior to drug administration and at 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.33, 1.67, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, and 36 hours post dose in each treatment period

Population: All subjects having all samples in all periods and subjects who missed samples that may not affect the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters in any period

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lina/Met 2.5mg/500mgArea Under the Curve 0 to Inf (AUC0-inf)7198.79 ng*h/mlStandard Deviation 1689.89
Lina 2.5mg Plus Met 500mgArea Under the Curve 0 to Inf (AUC0-inf)6923.79 ng*h/mlStandard Deviation 1714.08
Comparison: ANOVA was applied to log-transformed AUC0-inf and included study, subject-within-study, period-within-study, treatment and study-by-treatment interaction.90% CI: [101, 108]
Comparison: ANOVA was applied to log-transformed AUC0-inf and included study, subject-within-study, period-within-study, treatment and study-by-treatment interaction. Results were potency corrected (GMR multiplied by the quotient of DP of Met in single tablet and DP of Met in combination tablet).90% CI: [105, 112]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026