Prolift Versus IVS for Pelvic Floor Prolapse

Postoperative Comparison Between Posterior Prolift Mesh Placement and Posterior IVS Sling Placement

Status

Withdrawn

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT01383291

Enrollment

Registered

2011-06-28

Start date

2009-02-28

Completion date

2013-06-30

Last updated

2014-06-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Floor Prolapse

Keywords

pelvic floor prolapse, prolift, IVS, Surgery

Brief summary

* Women who underwent mesh or sling procedures to correct pelvic organ prolapse will be enrolled. * Their data will be collected from the files. * Comparison between two groups will be carried our: Those who underwent a posterior IVS and those who underwent posterior prolift procedure. * The data will be obtained by questionaires by a telephone interview by a physician who did not participate in the surgery. * Follow-up physical examination data will also be obtained.

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

CASE_CONTROL

Time perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

FEMALE

Age

18 Years to 95 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Women who previously underwent surgery for pelvic floor prolapse at least a year before

Exclusion criteria

* Women who did not have surgery for pelvic floor prolapse

Countries

Israel

Outcome results