Skip to content

Sodium Hyaluronate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.18% for Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome

A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Masked Study of Safety and Efficacy of Sodium Hyaluronate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.18% in Dry Eye Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01382225
Enrollment
1936
Registered
2011-06-27
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2013-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndrome

Keywords

Dry eyes, Ocular discomfort

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to determine if Sodium Hyaluronate, 0.18% is effective in treating the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.

Interventions

DRUGSodium Hyaluronate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.18%
OTHERVehicle

Inactive ingredients used as run-in and placebo comparator

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Documented history of dry eyes for at least 3 months. * Ocular discomfort due to dry eyes. * Presence of corneal and conjunctival staining. * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are pregnant or lactating. * Contact lens wear within 1 week before Screening and during the study. * Ocular surgery (of any type, including laser surgery) or ocular trauma within the 4 months prior to Screening. * Punctal plugs or punctal occlusion initiated within 3 months of screening * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Lissamine Green Staining (LGS) Total Score at Day 7Baseline, Day 7The investigator instilled an ophthalmic dye on the eye and rated staining in three areas (cornea, nasal, and temporal conjunctiva). Staining was rated on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4 (0=0% to 4=\>45%). The LGS Total Score (0-12) is the sum of the three individual ratings. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement.
Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Frequency (GSF) Total Score at Day 7Baseline, Day 7The subject completed a questionnaire and rated the frequency of five common dry eye symptoms. Frequency was rated on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 (0=never to 3=constantly). The GSF Total Score (0-15) is the sum of the five individual ratings. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in LGS Total Score at Day 14Baseline, Day 14The investigator instilled an ophthalmic dye on the eye and rated staining in three areas (cornea, nasal, and temporal conjunctiva). Staining was rated on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4 (0=0% to 4=\>45%). The LGS Total Score (0-12) is the sum of the three individual ratings. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement.
Change From Baseline in GSF Total Score at Day 14Baseline, Day 14The subject completed a questionnaire and rated the frequency of five common dry eye symptoms. Frequency was rated on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 (0=never to 3=constantly). The GSF Total Score (0-15) is the sum of the five individual ratings. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS) Total ScoreBaseline, up to Day 14The investigator instilled an ophthalmic dye on the eye and rated corneal staining by type, extent/surface area, and depth. Each staining was rated on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4 (0=no staining/0% to 4=patch/\>45%/immediate diffuse stromal glow). The CFS Total Score (0-12) is the sum of the three individual ratings. A more negative percentage change indicates a greater amount of improvement.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Schirmer I ScoreBaseline, up to Day 14The investigator placed a paper strip on the eye under the lower lid and left it in place for 5 minutes. The Schirmer I Score was the length of the strip wetted by the tears (0-35 millimeters). A more positive percentage change indicates a greater amount of improvement.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Intensity (GSI) Total ScoreBaseline, up to Day 14The subject completed a questionnaire and rated the intensity of five common dry eye symptoms. Intensity was rated on a visual analog scale from 0-100 (0=no symptoms to 100=severe symptoms). The GSI Total Score (0 to 500) is the sum of the five individual ratings. A more negative percentage change indicates a greater amount of improvement.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Composite Index (GSCI) ScoreBaseline, up to Day 14For each of 5 common dry eye symptoms, the frequency (0-3) and intensity (0-100) scores were multiplied to obtain the symptom score (0-300). The 5 symptom scores were summed to obtain the Global Symptom Composite Index Score (0-1500). A more negative percentage change indicates a greater amount of improvement.
Proportion of Improved Scores on the Global Impact on Dry Eye Syndrome on Daily Life (GIDL) RatingBaseline, Up to Day 14The subject was asked on a questionnaire, Please consider how your dry eyes feel when doing daily activities such as working on the computer, watching television, reading, and driving. Based on this, please rate the impact of your dry eye symptoms on your daily life, and responded on a 4-point scale from 0-3 (0=Absent to 3=Severe). Improved was defined as a change in score of \<0 from baseline. Proportion is reported as a percentage of participants. A greater percentage of subjects reporting a lower score indicates an improvement.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from 56 investigative sites in the United States.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 1936 subjects enrolled, 268 did not qualify for vehicle run-in and were exited as screen failures. Of the 1668 subjects receiving vehicle run-in, 214 did not qualify for randomization and were exited as screen failures. This reporting group includes the 1454 subjects randomized to receive treatment at Baseline Visit (Day 0).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sodium Hyaluronate
Run-in, followed by Sodium Hyaluronate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.18%, 1-2 drops instilled in each eye 3-6 times a day for 14 days
723
Vehicle
Run-in, followed by Vehicle, 1-2 drops instilled in each eye 3-6 times a day for 14 days
727
Total1,450

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event32
Overall StudyOther42
Overall StudyProtocol Violation21
Overall StudySubject Withdrew Consent52

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSodium HyaluronateVehicleTotal
Age, Customized
18-64 years
402 participants392 participants794 participants
Age, Customized
≥65 years
321 participants335 participants656 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
723 participants727 participants1450 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
590 Participants594 Participants1184 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
133 Participants133 Participants266 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 7230 / 727
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 7231 / 727

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Frequency (GSF) Total Score at Day 7

The subject completed a questionnaire and rated the frequency of five common dry eye symptoms. Frequency was rated on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 (0=never to 3=constantly). The GSF Total Score (0-15) is the sum of the five individual ratings. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 7

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sodium HyaluronateChange From Baseline in Global Symptom Frequency (GSF) Total Score at Day 7Baseline8.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Sodium HyaluronateChange From Baseline in Global Symptom Frequency (GSF) Total Score at Day 7Change from Baseline at Day 7-1.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
VehicleChange From Baseline in Global Symptom Frequency (GSF) Total Score at Day 7Baseline9.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
VehicleChange From Baseline in Global Symptom Frequency (GSF) Total Score at Day 7Change from Baseline at Day 7-1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Primary

Change From Baseline in Lissamine Green Staining (LGS) Total Score at Day 7

The investigator instilled an ophthalmic dye on the eye and rated staining in three areas (cornea, nasal, and temporal conjunctiva). Staining was rated on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4 (0=0% to 4=\>45%). The LGS Total Score (0-12) is the sum of the three individual ratings. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 7

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT): The set of all randomized subjects who received at least one administration of the allocated product, had baseline efficacy measurement, had at least 1 post-baseline measurement and received the correct formulation of the lissamine green solution.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sodium HyaluronateChange From Baseline in Lissamine Green Staining (LGS) Total Score at Day 7Baseline4.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Sodium HyaluronateChange From Baseline in Lissamine Green Staining (LGS) Total Score at Day 7Change from Baseline at Day 7-0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
VehicleChange From Baseline in Lissamine Green Staining (LGS) Total Score at Day 7Baseline4.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
VehicleChange From Baseline in Lissamine Green Staining (LGS) Total Score at Day 7Change from Baseline at Day 7-0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in GSF Total Score at Day 14

The subject completed a questionnaire and rated the frequency of five common dry eye symptoms. Frequency was rated on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 (0=never to 3=constantly). The GSF Total Score (0-15) is the sum of the five individual ratings. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 14

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sodium HyaluronateChange From Baseline in GSF Total Score at Day 14Baseline8.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Sodium HyaluronateChange From Baseline in GSF Total Score at Day 14Change from Baseline at Day 14-2.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
VehicleChange From Baseline in GSF Total Score at Day 14Baseline9.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
VehicleChange From Baseline in GSF Total Score at Day 14Change from Baseline at Day 14-2.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in LGS Total Score at Day 14

The investigator instilled an ophthalmic dye on the eye and rated staining in three areas (cornea, nasal, and temporal conjunctiva). Staining was rated on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4 (0=0% to 4=\>45%). The LGS Total Score (0-12) is the sum of the three individual ratings. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 14

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sodium HyaluronateChange From Baseline in LGS Total Score at Day 14Baseline4.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Sodium HyaluronateChange From Baseline in LGS Total Score at Day 14Change from Baseline at Day 14-1.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
VehicleChange From Baseline in LGS Total Score at Day 14Baseline4.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
VehicleChange From Baseline in LGS Total Score at Day 14Change from Baseline at Day 14-1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS) Total Score

The investigator instilled an ophthalmic dye on the eye and rated corneal staining by type, extent/surface area, and depth. Each staining was rated on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4 (0=no staining/0% to 4=patch/\>45%/immediate diffuse stromal glow). The CFS Total Score (0-12) is the sum of the three individual ratings. A more negative percentage change indicates a greater amount of improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, up to Day 14

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sodium HyaluronatePercentage Change From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS) Total ScoreBaseline4.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.1
Sodium HyaluronatePercentage Change From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 7-10.0 Percent changeStandard Deviation 40.3
Sodium HyaluronatePercentage Change From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 14-19.3 Percent changeStandard Deviation 46.6
VehiclePercentage Change From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS) Total ScoreBaseline4.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2
VehiclePercentage Change From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 7-10.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 36.9
VehiclePercentage Change From Baseline in Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 14-16.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 44.1
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Composite Index (GSCI) Score

For each of 5 common dry eye symptoms, the frequency (0-3) and intensity (0-100) scores were multiplied to obtain the symptom score (0-300). The 5 symptom scores were summed to obtain the Global Symptom Composite Index Score (0-1500). A more negative percentage change indicates a greater amount of improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, up to Day 14

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sodium HyaluronatePercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Composite Index (GSCI) ScoreBaseline594.8 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 249.9
Sodium HyaluronatePercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Composite Index (GSCI) ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 7-26.1 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 43.6
Sodium HyaluronatePercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Composite Index (GSCI) ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 14-40.1 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 44.9
VehiclePercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Composite Index (GSCI) ScoreBaseline608.4 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 258
VehiclePercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Composite Index (GSCI) ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 7-22.4 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 43.2
VehiclePercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Composite Index (GSCI) ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 14-36.3 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 44.4
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Intensity (GSI) Total Score

The subject completed a questionnaire and rated the intensity of five common dry eye symptoms. Intensity was rated on a visual analog scale from 0-100 (0=no symptoms to 100=severe symptoms). The GSI Total Score (0 to 500) is the sum of the five individual ratings. A more negative percentage change indicates a greater amount of improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, up to Day 14

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sodium HyaluronatePercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Intensity (GSI) Total ScoreBaseline294.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 80.8
Sodium HyaluronatePercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Intensity (GSI) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 7-18.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 34.1
Sodium HyaluronatePercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Intensity (GSI) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 14-31.6 Percent changeStandard Deviation 37.7
VehiclePercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Intensity (GSI) Total ScoreBaseline295.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 82.5
VehiclePercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Intensity (GSI) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 7-15.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 34.5
VehiclePercentage Change From Baseline in Global Symptom Intensity (GSI) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 14-26.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 38.4
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Schirmer I Score

The investigator placed a paper strip on the eye under the lower lid and left it in place for 5 minutes. The Schirmer I Score was the length of the strip wetted by the tears (0-35 millimeters). A more positive percentage change indicates a greater amount of improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, up to Day 14

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sodium HyaluronatePercentage Change From Baseline in Schirmer I ScoreBaseline9.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 8.6
Sodium HyaluronatePercentage Change From Baseline in Schirmer I ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 752.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 195.2
Sodium HyaluronatePercentage Change From Baseline in Schirmer I ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 1460.3 Percent changeStandard Deviation 273.2
VehiclePercentage Change From Baseline in Schirmer I ScoreBaseline10.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 8.5
VehiclePercentage Change From Baseline in Schirmer I ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 740.6 Percent changeStandard Deviation 139.8
VehiclePercentage Change From Baseline in Schirmer I ScoreChange from Baseline at Day 1447.0 Percent changeStandard Deviation 170.7
Secondary

Proportion of Improved Scores on the Global Impact on Dry Eye Syndrome on Daily Life (GIDL) Rating

The subject was asked on a questionnaire, Please consider how your dry eyes feel when doing daily activities such as working on the computer, watching television, reading, and driving. Based on this, please rate the impact of your dry eye symptoms on your daily life, and responded on a 4-point scale from 0-3 (0=Absent to 3=Severe). Improved was defined as a change in score of \<0 from baseline. Proportion is reported as a percentage of participants. A greater percentage of subjects reporting a lower score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Up to Day 14

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sodium HyaluronateProportion of Improved Scores on the Global Impact on Dry Eye Syndrome on Daily Life (GIDL) RatingDay 731.0 Percentage of Participants
Sodium HyaluronateProportion of Improved Scores on the Global Impact on Dry Eye Syndrome on Daily Life (GIDL) RatingDay 1442.7 Percentage of Participants
VehicleProportion of Improved Scores on the Global Impact on Dry Eye Syndrome on Daily Life (GIDL) RatingDay 726.5 Percentage of Participants
VehicleProportion of Improved Scores on the Global Impact on Dry Eye Syndrome on Daily Life (GIDL) RatingDay 1438.0 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026