Skip to content

Effect of Ezetimibe Treatment on Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Levels in Participants With Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Already Treated With a Statin (MK-0653A-205 AM1)

Austrian Cholesterol Screening And Treatment II (ACT II)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01381679
Acronym
ACT II
Enrollment
1682
Registered
2011-06-27
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2022-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia

Brief summary

This non-interventional longitudinal study is a follow-up of the Austrian Cholesterol Screening and Treatment project (ACT I), which assessed the cholesterol status, including achievement of the target levels applicable at that time (LDL levels \<100 mg/dL), in participants with coronary heart disease (CHD) already being treated with a statin. In this study, participants without adequate LDL-cholesterol reduction with a statin underwent extension of therapy with ezetimibe with the goal of achieving target levels.

Interventions

DRUGEzetimibe

Ezetimibe was not mandatory and was prescribed as per routine prescription by physician.

Sponsors

Organon and Co
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants in whom LDL-cholesterol target levels have not been achieved. * Participants in whom a decision has been made by the physician to initiate treatment with ezetimibe (longitudinal analyses). The treatment decision will be made prior to and independent from inclusion of participants into this study. \- Participants with LDL cholesterol levels ≤113 mg/dl and a very high risk, which led to case-by-case approval of medication may be documented.

Exclusion criteria

* Any condition which, in the opinion of the treating physician, precludes treatment with ezetimibe. * In order not to interfere with data collection it is recommended not to include participants currently in a clinical trial. * Previous and ongoing treatment with ezetimibe.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Achieving Individual LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) Target LevelUp to 12 monthsIndividual LDL-C target values were set according to the Austrian Cholesterol Consensus (ACC) 2007 for patients for patients suffering from coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD equivalent in an office-based, routine medical care setting. Participants were categorized as either high-risk or very high-risk based on ACC criteria. The LDL-C target levels for each category were 100 mg/dL and 70 mg/dL, respectively

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change From Baseline in TC at Month 12Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 3Baseline and Month 3
Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 12Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Month 3Baseline and Month 3
Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Month 12Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) at Month 3Baseline and Month 3
Change From Baseline in TG at Month 12Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Month 3Baseline and Month 3

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Participants in whom low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target levels have not been achieved and for whom ezetimibe therapy has been chosen.
1,682
Total1,682

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event3
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up885

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous64.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
Region of Enrollment
Austria
1682 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Females
655 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Males
1003 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Not Reported
24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1,682
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 1,682

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Achieving Individual LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) Target Level

Individual LDL-C target values were set according to the Austrian Cholesterol Consensus (ACC) 2007 for patients for patients suffering from coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD equivalent in an office-based, routine medical care setting. Participants were categorized as either high-risk or very high-risk based on ACC criteria. The LDL-C target levels for each category were 100 mg/dL and 70 mg/dL, respectively

Time frame: Up to 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants Achieving Individual LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) Target Level678 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Month 12

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: Participants with baseline, follow-up visit 1 (3 months), and follow-up visit 2 (12 months) measurements for HDL-C.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in HDL-C at Month 124.0 mg/dL95% Confidence Interval 15.05
Secondary

Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Month 3

Time frame: Baseline and Month 3

Population: Participants with baseline, follow-up visit 1 (3 months), and follow-up visit 2 (12 months) measurements for HDL-C.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Month 32.8 mg/dL95% Confidence Interval 14.17
Secondary

Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 12

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: Participants with baseline, follow-up visit 1 (3 months), and follow-up visit 2 (12 months) measurements for LDL-C.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 12-49.3 mg/dL95% Confidence Interval 26.64
Secondary

Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 3

Time frame: Baseline and Month 3

Population: Participants with baseline, follow-up visit 1 (3 months), and follow-up visit 2 (12 months) measurements for LDL-C.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in LDL-C at Month 3-41.7 mg/dL95% Confidence Interval 31.81
Secondary

Change From Baseline in TC at Month 12

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: Participants with baseline, follow-up visit 1 (3 months), and follow-up visit 2 (12 months) measurements for TC.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in TC at Month 12-54.5 mg/dL95% Confidence Interval 37.62
Secondary

Change From Baseline in TG at Month 12

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: Participants with baseline, follow-up visit 1 (3 months), and follow-up visit 2 (12 months) measurements for TG.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in TG at Month 12-43.9 mg/dL95% Confidence Interval 75.06
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Month 3

Time frame: Baseline and Month 3

Population: Participants with baseline, follow-up visit 1 (3 months), and follow-up visit 2 (12 months) measurements for TC.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC) at Month 3-46.6 mg/dL95% Confidence Interval 40.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) at Month 3

Time frame: Baseline and Month 3

Population: Participants with baseline, follow-up visit 1 (3 months), and follow-up visit 2 (12 months) measurements for TG.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) at Month 3-33.8 mg/dL95% Confidence Interval 82.51

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026