Skip to content

Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER® System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure: FIX-HF-5C

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER® System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure With Ejection Fraction Between 25% and 45%: FIX-HF-5C

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01381172
Acronym
FIX-HF-5C
Enrollment
160
Registered
2011-06-27
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2019-03-19
Last updated
2021-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

NYHA Class III Heart Failure, NYHA Class IV Heart Failure

Keywords

Heart Failure, Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic heart disease, Cardiac contractility modulation, CCM, CHF

Brief summary

The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the OPTIMIZER® System in subjects with medically refractory moderate-to-severe heart failure.

Detailed description

The Impulse Dynamics FIX-HF-5C Study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) signals delivered by the implantable OPTIMIZER System in patients with NYHA class III and IV heart failure and an ejection fraction 25-45%. The study will involve the recruitment of 160 subjects at a total of up to 60 sites. Those subjects who fulfill all inclusion and exclusion criteria based upon baseline test results will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the OPTIMIZER System plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) or to a control group receiving OMT alone. All randomized subjects will be followed for 24 weeks and shall receive the same study related assessments throughout the course of the study. In addition, all subjects will continue to receive OMT for the treatment of their heart failure. Mortality will be reported out to 2 years.

Interventions

The OPTIMIZER System delivers non-excitatory cardiac contractility modulating (CCM) electrical signals to the heart muscle. Treatment group subjects receive five non-contiguous one-hour periods of CCM signals per day.

OTHERNo intervention: Optimal medical therapy

The control group receives optimal medical therapy only.

Sponsors

Impulse Dynamics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects who are 18 years of age or older 2. Subjects who are either male or female. Females of childbearing potential must be using a medically approved method of birth control and must agree to continue to use birth control throughout the study, or must be surgically sterilized (tubal ligation, hysterectomy) or post-menopausal for at least 1 year. 3. Condition 1. Subjects who have a baseline ejection fraction greater than or equal to 25% and less than or equal to 45% by echocardiography determined by the echocardiography core laboratory. 2. Subjects who have been treated for heart failure for at least 90 days (including treatment with a β-blocker for at least 90 days unless the subject is intolerant) and are in New York Heart Association functional Class III and IV at the time of enrollment. 3. Subjects receiving appropriate, stable medical therapy during the 30 days prior to enrollment for treatment of heart failure according to the region- specific guideline recommendations. For patients with EF≤35%, this regimen shall consist of the appropriate doses of diuretics, ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker and β-blocker. Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or 50% decrease in dose. 4. Subjects who, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator (based on the current guidelines for clinical practice ), have a clinical indication for an implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD, e.g., EF≤35%) and/or pacemaker, must have an existing device or agree to undergo implantation of such a device unless the patient refuses to undergo the implantation of such device for personal reasons. 5. Subjects who are willing and able to return for all follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects whose baseline peak VO2 is \<9 or \>20 ml O2/min/kg. 2. Subjects who have a potentially correctible cause of heart failure, such as valvular heart disease or congenital heart disease. 3. Subjects who have clinically significant angina pectoris, consisting of angina during daily life (i.e., Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina score of II or more), an episode of unstable angina within 30 days of enrollment, or angina and/or ECG changes during exercise testing performed during baseline evaluation. 4. Subjects who have been hospitalized for heart failure which required the use of inotropic support within 30 days of enrollment. 5. Subjects who have a clinically significant amount of ambient ectopy, defined as more than 8,900 PVCs per 24 hours on baseline Holter monitoring. 6. Subjects having a PR interval greater than 375 ms. 7. Subjects who have chronic (permanent or persistent) atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter or those cardioverted within 30 days of enrollment. 8. Subjects whose exercise tolerance is limited by a condition other than heart failure (e.g., angina, COPD, peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic or rheumatologic conditions) or who are unable to perform baseline stress testing. 9. Subjects who are scheduled for a CABG or a PTCA procedure, or who have undergone a CABG procedure within 90 days or a PTCA procedure within 30 days of enrollment. 10. Subjects who have a biventricular pacing system, an accepted indication for such a device, or a QRS width of 130ms or greater. 11. Subjects who have had a myocardial infarction within 90 days of enrollment. 12. Subjects who have mechanical tricuspid valve. 13. Subjects who have a prior heart transplant. 14. Subjects on dialysis. 15. Subjects who are participating in another experimental protocol. 16. Subjects who are unable to provide informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peak VO224 weeksExercise tolerance quantified by peak VO2 measured with cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX) and evaluated by a blinded core lab.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire24 weeksChange in quality of life at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire. The MLWHFQ score could range from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating more significant impairment in health-related quality of lif
Peak VO2 With Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER)24 weeksPeak VO2 with change in respiratory exchange ratio (RER) included as a covariate, as measured by a blinded core lab.
NYHA24 weeksHeart failure class, as assessed by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification.
Peak VO2 With a Peak RER of ≥1.0524 weeksPeak VO2 in an analysis that only includes tests with a peak RER of ≥1.05.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
6 Minute Hall Walk24 weeksDistance walked in 6 minutes
VE/VCO224 weeksVE/VCO2 measured during cardiopulmonary stress testing (CPX) and evaluated by a blinded core lab.

Countries

Czechia, Germany, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment
The treatment group receives the OPTIMIZER System implant and continues with optimal heart failure medical therapy. Optimizer System: The OPTIMIZER System delivers non-excitatory cardiac contractility modulating (CCM) electrical signals to the heart muscle. Treatment group subjects receive five non-contiguous one-hour periods of CCM signals per day.
74
Control
The Control group will not receive the OPTIMIZER System and will continue with optimal heart failure medical therapy. No intervention: Optimal medical therapy: The control group receives optimal medical therapy only.
86
Total160

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatmentTotalControl
6 Minute Hall Walk (meters)324.07 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 89.71
320.46 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.94045
316.85 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 88.37
Age, Continuous61.4 years60.7 years60.0 years
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) score57.35 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.36
56.885 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.28991
56.42 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.95
NYHA Class III64 Participants142 Participants78 Participants
NYHA Class IV10 Participants18 Participants8 Participants
Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min)15.36 ml/kg/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.81
15.425 ml/kg/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.141
15.49 ml/kg/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.61
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
14 Participants29 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants11 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
55 Participants116 Participants61 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
11 Participants20 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
62 Participants136 Participants74 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants38 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
52 Participants122 Participants70 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 744 / 86
other
Total, other adverse events
35 / 7436 / 86
serious
Total, serious adverse events
20 / 7419 / 86

Outcome results

Primary

Peak VO2

Exercise tolerance quantified by peak VO2 measured with cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX) and evaluated by a blinded core lab.

Time frame: 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentPeak VO215.28 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 3.66
ControlPeak VO214.79 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 3.54
Comparison: The FIX-HF-5C Study was a study designed to confirm the preliminary evidence reported in the FIX-HF-5 subgroup analysis demonstrating improvement in subjects with LVEF 25-45% and NYHA class III-IV. A Bayesian statistical approach was employed to leverage the data available, particularly the pVO2 results, from the FIX-HF-5 subgroup.p-value: 0.975Bayesian posterior probability
Secondary

Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire

Change in quality of life at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire. The MLWHFQ score could range from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating more significant impairment in health-related quality of lif

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Randomized subjects

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire35.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.63
ControlMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire47.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.65
Secondary

NYHA

Heart failure class, as assessed by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Improvement of 1 NYHA class or more.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TreatmentNYHA57 Participants
ControlNYHA32 Participants
Secondary

Peak VO2 With a Peak RER of ≥1.05

Peak VO2 in an analysis that only includes tests with a peak RER of ≥1.05.

Time frame: 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentPeak VO2 With a Peak RER of ≥1.051.13 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 0.96
ControlPeak VO2 With a Peak RER of ≥1.051.1 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 0.96
Secondary

Peak VO2 With Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER)

Peak VO2 with change in respiratory exchange ratio (RER) included as a covariate, as measured by a blinded core lab.

Time frame: 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentPeak VO2 With Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER)15.55 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 3.51
ControlPeak VO2 With Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER)15.25 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 3.21
Other Pre-specified

6 Minute Hall Walk

Distance walked in 6 minutes

Time frame: 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment6 Minute Hall Walk324 metersStandard Deviation 90
Control6 Minute Hall Walk317 metersStandard Deviation 88
Other Pre-specified

VE/VCO2

VE/VCO2 measured during cardiopulmonary stress testing (CPX) and evaluated by a blinded core lab.

Time frame: 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentVE/VCO215.0 unitlessStandard Deviation 9
ControlVE/VCO214.7 unitlessStandard Deviation 6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026