Skip to content

Platelet-rich Plasma Intra-articular Knee Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Clinical Trial, Comparing Platelet-rich Plasma Intra-articular Knee Injections Versus Corticosteroid Intra-articular Knee Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01381081
Enrollment
74
Registered
2011-06-27
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2015-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

knee osteoarthritis, comparing platelet-rich plasma, intra-articular knee injections

Brief summary

The benefit of using platelet rich plasma (PRP) in cartilage injuries, and specifically in degenerative ones, has not been assessed yet. Current studies on the PRP healing or repairing effect on knee cartilage degenerative injuries are not conclusive to establish a standard of behavior, although PRP has shown to improve joint functionality and reduce pain. Hypothesis: PRP intra-articular injections in osteoarthritic knees reduces pain and leads to a more effective and lasting functional recovering than corticosteroid intra-articular injections.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALplatelet-rich plasma

a single intra-articular injection

DRUGCorticosteroid

A single betamethasone and bupivacaine intra-articular injection

Sponsors

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee confirmed radiologically * Degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee replacement candidate * Walking ability in patients with or without external support * Baseline in pain VAS greater than 60

Exclusion criteria

* Neoplastic disease * Immunosuppressive States * Patients who received intra-articular injections of steroids, anesthetic and / or hyaluronic acid in the last 3 months. * Patients who have undergone arthroscopic surgery on the last 3 months * Patients with involvement of bone metabolism except osteoporosis (Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, osteomalacia) * Fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome * Liver disease * Deficit coagulation (blood dyscrasia) * Thrombocytopenia * Anticoagulant treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The value of the visual analogue scale pain (VAS)one month after the treatmentThe difference between the baseline and the value of the scale one month after treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
the value of pain visual analog scale according to4 weeks, 3 and 6 months after treatment
the functional level of the knee KOOS4 weeks, 3 and 6 months after treatment
All reported adverse events4 weeks, 3 and 6 months after treatment
Scale of the SF36 quality of life4 weeks, 3 and 6 months after treatment

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026