Skip to content

Primary Prevention of Peristomial Hernias Via Parietal Prostheses

Primary Prevention of Peristomial Hernias Via Parietal Prostheses: a Randomized, Multicentric Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01380860
Acronym
GRECCAR 07
Enrollment
200
Registered
2011-06-27
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2025-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parastomal Hernia

Keywords

mesh, hernia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare rates of hernia formation between colostomies created with no hernia preventing mesh versus colostomies created with a particular mesh.

Detailed description

Previous studies indicate that implanting mesh for peristomal hernia repair may efficiently prevent hernia relapse. However, mesh provides a good infection site, which is not a desirable characteristic for a material adjacent to a colostomy port. Our goal is to implement a high-quality, randomized trial to demonstrate whether or not systematic mesh implantation upon primary hernia creation is an effective means of avoiding this common and troublesome complication.

Interventions

PROCEDUREColostomy with mesh implantation

Colostomy with mesh implantation

PROCEDURESimple colostomy

Colostomy with no mesh implantation.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient has given informed consent * The patient must be affiliated with a health insurance programme * The patient must be available for 24 months of follow-up * The patient requires a colostomy (primo-event, ie first colostomies only)

Exclusion criteria

* The patient is currently participating in another interventional study * The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study * The patient is under guardianship * The patient refuses to sign the consent * It is impossible to communicate information to the patient (does not read French) * The patient is pregnant * The patient is breastfeeding * There is a contra-indication for any treatment used in this study * The subject has already had a colostomy * The subject has peritonitis * The subject needs a colostomy for infectious reasons

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence/absence of a peristomal hernia24 monthsThe occurrence of peristomal hernias is determined in both groups every three months up until 24 months. The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam, and at 24 months by an additional radiology exam. The primary outcome concerns rates at 24 months, primo-events only.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Was stomal repair necessary for the patient? yes/no24 months
Was relocation of the colostomy required? yes/no24 months
Presence/absence of peristomal hernia12 monthsThe presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
Days of hospitalisation1 monthThe number of days spent in the hospital after the surgical intervention.
Operating time (minutes)Day 1
Presence/absence of complications24 monthsComplications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
Patient difficulty for fitting his/her colostomy with the appropriate sac.24 monthsA visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
Pain around the colostomy24 monthsA visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
Abdominal pain24 monthsA visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
Pain medication consumption24 months
Estimation of blood loss during the operation (ml)Day 1
Number of colostomy sac changes per day24 months
Does the patient consider fitting a sac to his/her colostomy to be a difficult task? yes/no24 months
Questionnaire Stoma-QOL24 monthsValidated assessment of quality of life.
Exposition of the prothesis (mesh): yes/no24 months
Presence/absence of peri-operative complicationsDay 1
Presence/absence of a complication potentially linked to the presence of a mesh?1 month
Ablation of the mesh: yes/no1 month
Evaluation of colostomy healing by the clinicianDay 1The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
Duration of postoperative fever (hours)10 days
Presence/absence of postoperative fever > 37.2°CDay 1
Number of colostomy leaks per day24 months

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026