Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Anorectal Application of Dx-gel for Treatment of Anal Incontinence

Safety and Efficacy of Anorectal Application of Dx-gel for Treatment of Anal Incontinence

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01380132
Enrollment
35
Registered
2011-06-27
Start date
2004-02-29
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2011-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fecal Incontinence

Keywords

Fecal incontinence, Treatment, Surgery

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether anorectal application of Nasha Dx is safe and effective for treatment of anal incontinence.

Detailed description

Patients not fully improved after 1:st injection were offered reinjection after 4-6 weeks.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAnal injection of Nasha Dx

Submucous injection of Nasha Dx 5-10 mm above dentate line

Sponsors

Galderma R&D
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Uppsala University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Incontinence to loose or solid stool at least once weekly (Millers incontinence score 6-12). * Age 18-80 * Available for follow-up for the duration of the study * Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Sphincter defect visible on anal ultrasound. * Pregnancy. * Rectal prolapse or inflammatory bowel disease. * Recent (within 6 months) anal surgery except for haemorrhoids. * Anorectal sepsis. * Anticoagulant medication or bleeding diathesis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Treatment response as measured by a 50% reduction in no of incontinence episodes.One year posttreatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse eventsOne year posttreatment
Global assessmentOne year posttreatmentGraded by the patient as excellent, good, fair or poor
Change in incontinence episodesOne year posttreatmentMeasured relative baseline based on a 4-week diary
Quality of lifeOne year posttreatmentMeasured with a validated bowel function questionnaire
Treatment response as measured by a 50% reduction in no of incontinence episodes.Two years posttreatment

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026