Skip to content

Non-Invasive Reduction of Abdominal Fat Utilizing the CoolFlex and eZ App 6.3 Applicators

Non-Invasive Reduction of Abdominal Fat Utilizing the CoolFlex and eZ App 6.3 Applicators

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01377740
Enrollment
20
Registered
2011-06-21
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2017-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fat Reduction in the Abdomen

Keywords

Lipolysis, Cryolipolysis, Fat Reduction

Brief summary

This study is being performed to reduce unwanted abdominal fat using two different applicators for the Zeltiq System.

Detailed description

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of the CoolFlex applicator compared to the performance of the eZ App 6.3 applicator in the treatment of abdominal fat in terms of its ability to achieve a discernable change to the contour of the treated area.

Interventions

Non-invasive cooling is applied to the treatment area with a defined cooling rate and duration.

Sponsors

Zeltiq Aesthetics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Female subjects \> 18 years of age and \< 65 years of age. 2. Subject has clearly visible fat on the abdomen. (Figure 1) 3. Subject has not had weight change exceeding 10 pounds in the preceding month. 4. Subject agrees to maintain their weight (i.e., within 5 pounds) by not making any major changes in their diet or lifestyle during the course of the study. 5. Subject has read and signed a written informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject has had a surgical procedure(s) in the area of intended treatment. 2. Subject has had an invasive fat reduction procedure (e.g., liposuction, abdominoplasty, mesotherapy) in the area of intended treatment. 3. Subject has had a non-invasive fat reduction and/or body contouring procedure in the area of intended treatment within the past 6 months. 4. Subject has discernable asymmetry or contour irregularity in the intended treatment area. 5. Subject needs to administer, or has a known history of subcutaneous injections into the area of intended treatment (e.g., heparin, insulin) within the past month. 6. Subject has a known history of cryoglobulinemia, cold urticaria, or paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria. 7. Subject has a known history of Raynaud's disease, or any known condition with a response to cold exposure that limits blood flow to the skin. 8. Subject has a history of bleeding disorder or is taking any medication that in the investigator's opinion may increase the subject's risk of bruising. 9. Subject body mass index (BMI) exceeds 40. BMI is defined as weight in pounds multiplied by 703 divided by the square of the height in inches. 10. Subject is taking or has taken diet pills or supplements within the past month. 11. Subject has any dermatological conditions, such as moderate to excessive skin laxity, or scars in the location of the treatment sites that may interfere with the treatment or evaluation. 12. Subject is pregnant or intending to become pregnant in the next 6 months. 13. Subject is lactating or has been lactating in the past 6 months. 14. Subject is unable or unwilling to comply with the study requirements. 15. Subject is currently enrolled in a clinical study of any other unapproved investigational drug or device. 16. Any other condition or laboratory value that would, in the professional opinion of the investigator, potentially affect the subject's response or the integrity of the data or would pose an unacceptable risk to the subject.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Independent imaging review16 weeksThe primary effectiveness endpoint is the percent of reviews by the reviewers which either identify no clinically significant difference in fat reduction between the two sides of the abdomen, or identify greater fat reduction on the side of the abdomen treated with the CoolFlex applicator at 8 weeks post-treatment. It is expected that the percentage of reviews identifying no clinically significant difference between the two sides of the abdomen or identifying greater fat reduction on the side of the abdomen treated with the CoolFlex applicator at 8 weeks post-treatment will be at least 75%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall reduction16 weeksOverall reduction in the fat layer thickness on each side of the abdomen, as demonstrated by comparison of pre-treatment and 8- and 16-week post-treatment ultrasound measurements, for all evaluable subjects (i.e., adequate ultrasound imaging data sets).
Subject satisfaction16 weeksSubject satisfaction with the Zeltiq procedure as determined by the results of a subject satisfaction questionnaire at the 8- and 16-week follow-up visits.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026