Skip to content

Ph 2B/3 Tafenoquine (TFQ) Study in Prevention of Vivax Relapse

A Multi-centre, Double-blind, Randomised, Parallel-group, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Tafenoquine (SB-252263, WR238605) in Subjects With Plasmodium Vivax Malaria.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01376167
Enrollment
851
Registered
2011-06-20
Start date
2014-04-24
Completion date
2016-11-18
Last updated
2018-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malaria, Vivax

Brief summary

The purpose of this two part study is to test the safety and efficacy of Tafenoquine (with Cholorquine) as a radical cure for Plasmodium vivax (P.vivax) malaria relative to the control Chloroquine.Part 1 aims to select an efficacious and well tolerated dose that can be co-administered with Chloroquine. Part 2 will investigate the safety and efficacy of the selected dose (300 mg tafenoquine) in the treatment and radical cure of Plasmodium Vivax Malaria.

Detailed description

Plasmodium vivax represents 50-80% of all malarial cases in Latin America and South East Asia. It is able to establish a dormant liver stage called the hypnozoite. Hypnozoite activation after initial infection can cause a relapse. Currently the only widely available drug is primaquine which requires administration over 14 days, resulting in poor compliance and treatment failure. Tafenoquine (an 8-aminoquinoline anti-malarial drug) has been shown to possess activity against all stages of the plasmodium life cycle, including the dormant stage in the liver. This is a multi-centre, double dummy, double blind, parallel group, randomized, active control study which is conducted in two parts. For both parts, subjects are treated with Chloroquine on days 1 to 3 (600mg, 600mg, and 300mg) to treat the blood stage vivax malaria. Part 1 will include at least 324 subjects and part 2 at least 600 subjects. Part 1 has 6 treatment arms, arms 1 to 4 contain different doses of Tafenoquine (50mg, 100mg, 300mg, and 600mg) dosed on day 1 or 2, arm 5 contains primaquine (15mg) dosing over 14 days (days 2-15 (15mg)) and arm 6 contains chloroquine only. The aim of this is to find a dose of Tafenoquine which meets the defined dose criteria. Based on Part 1 efficacy and safety, a single Tafenoquine dose (300 mg) will be studied in the pivotal Part 2. Part 2 contains 3 treatment arms one with the selected Tafenoquine dose (300 mg), the second arm will be 15mg Primaquine which will again be dosed over 14 days and the final arm contains chloroquine only dosed days 1-3 (600mg, 600mg, 300mg). Therefore as with Part 1, in Part 2 all subjects will receive Chloroquine. The aim of Part 2 is to investigate the safety and efficacy of the selected Tafenoquine/Chloroquine dose in the treatment and radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria. In addition to the Primary and Secondary endpoints stated below we will also be collecting; other efficacy endpoints (gametocyte clearance time, Recrudescence defined as any Plasmodium vivax parasitemia occurring on or before Day 29 (blood stage treatment failure), Incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria and Incidence of recrudescence and new Plasmodium vivax infection, determined by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), safety endpoints (clinically relevant haemolysis leading to drops in haemoglobin / haematocrit or complications thereof (required transfusions, acute renal failure), changes in methaemoglobin, gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability - incidence of abdominal pain, heartburn, diarrhoea, constipation, nausea and vomiting and ophthalmic safety - incidence of corneal deposits, retinal and visual field abnormalities. Data collected at up to four centres . Additionally, the incidence and severity of adverse events and abnormal laboratory observations will be presented).Pharmacokinetic endpoints (Population pharmacokinetic parameters for tafenoquine including but not limited to oral clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F)and Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic endpoints (e.g. tafenoquine plasma concentrations) and selected Pharmacodynamic endpoints (e.g. relapse efficacy, change in methaemoglobin) if appropriate, will be explored.

Interventions

single dose 50mg Tafenoquine given to subject on treatment arm 1 on Days 1 or 2

DRUGChloroquine 600mg

600mg Chloroquine given to each subject on Day 1 and Day2 of the trial

DRUGChloroquine 300mg

300mg Chloroquine given to each subject on Day 3 of the trial

single dose 100mg Tafenoquine given to subject on treatment arm 2 on Days 1 or 2

single dose 300mg Tafenoquine given to subject on treatment arm 3 on Days 1 or 2

single dose 600mg Tafenoquine given to subject on treatment arm 4 on Days 1 or 2

DRUGPrimaquine 15mg

15mg Primaquine given once daily to subject on treatment arm 5 on Days 2 to 15.

DRUGChloroquine 600mg (Part 2 )

600mg Chloroquine given to each subject on Day 1 and Day2 of the trial.

DRUGChloroquine 300mg (Part 2 )

300mg Chloroquine given to each subject on Day 3 of the trial.

DRUGTafenoquine 300mg (Part 2)

single dose 300mg Tafenoquine given to subject on treatment arm 3 on Days 1 or 2.

DRUGPrimaquine 15mg (Part2 )

15mg Primaquine given once daily to subject on treatment arm 3 on Days 2 to 15.

Sponsors

Medicines for Malaria Venture
CollaboratorOTHER
GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- Positive Giemsa smear for P. vivax * Parasite density \>100 and \<200,000/μL * ≥16 years * A female is eligible if she is non-pregnant, nonlactating and if she is of: - non-child bearing potential defined as: post-menopausal (12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea or 6 months of spontaneous amenorrhea with serum follicle stimulating hormone \>40 mIU/mL), pre-menopausal and has had a hysterectomy or a bilateral oophorectomy (removal of the ovaries) or a bilateral tubal ligation with medical report verification, negative pregnancy test or, * child-bearing potential, has a negative serum pregnancy test at screening, and agrees to comply with one of the following during the treatment stage of the study and for a period of 90 days after stopping study drug: * Use of oral contraceptive, either combined or progestogen alone used in conjunction with double barrier method as defined below * Use of an intrauterine device with a documented failure rate of \<1% per year * Use of depo provera injection (part 2) * Double barrier method consisting of spermicide with either condom or diaphragm * Male partner who is sterile prior to the female subject's entry into the study and is the sole sexual partner for that female. * Complete abstinence from intercourse for 2 weeks prior to administration of study drug, throughout the study and for a period of 90 days after stopping study drug. * A signed and dated informed consent is obtained from the subject or the subject's legal representative prior to screening. NB Assent is obtained from subjects \<18 years, where applicable and written or oral witnessed consent has been obtained from parent or guardian. * The subject is able to understand and comply with protocol requirements, instructions and protocol-stated restrictions and is likely to complete the study as planned. * Willing to be hospitalized for 3 days and return to clinic for all follow-up visits including Day 180 * QTc \<450 msec at screening, based on a single QTcF value at screening (part 1 only) or as an average of triplicate Electrocardiogram obtained over a brief recording period by machine or manual over-read if first is \>450 msec.-

Exclusion criteria

- Mixed malaria infections (e.g. identified by Giemsa-stained smear or rapid diagnostic test) * Severe vivax malaria as defined by World Health Organisation criteria. * Severe vomiting (no food or inability to take food during previous 8 hours) * Screening haemoglobin concentration \<7 g/dL. * Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, assessed by a quantitative spectrophotometric phenotype assay: Part 1 - Males: Any subject with an enzyme level \<70% of the site median value for Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase normals will be excluded. Females: Those females with a screening Hb ≥ 10 g/dL will only be excluded if their enzyme level is \<70% of the site median value for Glucose 6-Phosphate dehydrogenase normals. hose females with Hb ≥7 but \< 10 g/dL will be excluded if an enzyme level is not \> 90% of the site median value for Glucose 6-Phosphate dehydrogenase normals. Part 2 - Any subject with enzyme level \<70% of the site median value for Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase normals will be excluded * Liver function test alanine transaminase \>2x Upper Limit of Normal * Any clinically significant concurrent illness (e.g. pneumonia, septicaemia), pre-existing conditions (e.g. renal disease, malignancy), conditions that may affect absorption of study medication (e.g. vomiting or severe diarrhea) or clinical signs and symptoms of severe cardiovascular disease (e.g. uncontrolled congestive heart failure or severe coronary artery disease). These abnormalities may be identified on the screening history and physical or laboratory examination. * Subject has taken antimalarials (e.g. ACT, mefloquine, primaquine, chloroquine) or drugs with anti-malarial activity within the past 30 days by history. * History of allergy to chloroquine, mefloquine, tafenoquine, primaquine or to any other 4- or 8-aminoquinolines. * Any contraindications to chloroquine or primaquine administration including a history of porphyria, psoriasis or epilepsy (please refer to chloroquine and primaquine locally approved prescribing information). * Subject who has previously received study medication for this protocol (all parts) or has received treatment with any other investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding the first dose of study medication. * History of illicit drug abuse or heavy alcohol intake within 6 months of the study. * Subjects who have taken or will likely require the use of medications from the prohibited medication list which include the following classes: Histamine-2 blockers and antacids. * Drugs with haemolytic potential. * Drugs known to prolong the QTc interval

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Recurrence-free Efficacy at 6 Months Post Dose6 months post doseA participant was considered to have demonstrated recurrence-free efficacy at 6 months if: a) Participant had non-zero P vivax asexual parasite count at Baseline. b) Participant showed initial clearance of P vivax parasitemia defined as two negative asexual P vivax parasite counts, with at least 6 hours between the counts, and no positive counts in the interval. c) Participant had no positive asexual P vivax parasite count at any assessment prior to or on Study Day 201 following initial parasite clearance. d) Participant did not take a concomitant medication with anti-malarial activity at any point between Study Day 1 and their last parasite assessment. e) Participant is parasite-free at 6 months. Participants were censored if they did not have P.vivax at Baseline, or took a drug with anti-malarial action despite not having malaria parasites, or did not have a 6 month assessment. The number of participants with recurrence-free efficacy at 6 months has been summarized.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Recurrence of P Vivax MalariaUp to Day 180Recurrence was defined as the first confirmed presence of P vivax asexual stage parasites after clearance of initial parasitemia following CQ treatment. Time to recurrence was defined as the time (in days) from initial parasite clearance to recurrence. The time to recurrence was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. NA indicates data was not available due to insufficient number of participants with events during the follow up period in the study. The median number of days to recurrence along with 95% confidence interval has been presented for each treatment group.
Time to Parasite ClearanceUp to Day 180Parasite clearance time was defined as time needed to clear asexual parasite from the blood that is, parasite numbers falling below the limit of detection in the thick blood smear and remaining undetectable after 6 to 12 hours. The time taken to achieve parasite clearance was analyzed using Kaplan Meier Methodology. The median parasite clearance time along with 95% confidence interval has been presented for each treatment group.
Time to Fever ClearanceUp to Day 180Fever clearance time was defined as time from first dose of treatment to the time when body temperature falls to normal within Study Days 1-4 and remains normal for at least 48 hours up to the Day 8 visit. Fever clearance was considered to have been achieved once an initial temperature of more than 37.40 degree Celsius is reduced to a value less than or equal to 37.40 degree Celsius and in the absence of value more than 37.40 degree Celsius in the following 48 hours up to the Day 8 visit. The time taken to achieve fever clearance was analyzed using Kaplan Meier Methodology. The median fever clearance time along with 95% confidence interval has been presented for each treatment group.
Number of Participants With Hemoglobin Decline From Baseline Over First 29 DaysBaseline and up to Day 29Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD) deficiency is known to be a risk factor for hemolysis in participants treated with 8-aminoquinolines. Blood samples were collected for the evaluation of hemoglobin levels. Hemoglobin decreases of \>=30% or \>3 grams/deciliter (g/dL) from Baseline; or, an overall drop in hemoglobin below 6.0 g/dL in the first 15 days of the study were considered as protocol defined serious adverse events (SAEs). Number of participants with maximum hemoglobin decline from Baseline over first 29 days of study has been summarized. Safety Population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Potentially Related to Hemoglobin DecreaseUp to Day 180TEAEs are defined as adverse events (AEs) with an onset date and time on or after that of the start of first dose of study medication (including CQ). The number of participants with TEAEs potentially related to hemoglobin decrease has been presented.
Number of Participants Who Received Blood TransfusionUp to Day 180The number of participants who received blood transfusion as a result of hemoglobin decline has been summarized.
Number of Participants With Acute Renal FailureUp to Day 180There were no participants with acute renal failure in the study.
Change From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinBaseline and up to Day 120Methemoglobin assessment was made with the aid of a non-invasive signal extraction pulse CO-Oximeter handheld machine (Masimo). The change from Baseline in percent methemoglobin by treatment, time and sex has been summarized. The last assessment performed prior to the first dose of study medication (CQ or randomized treatment) was considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post baseline assessment minus the Baseline assessment for percent methemoglobin. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Number of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersUp to Day 180Gastrointestinal tolerability was analyzed by the number of par experiencing gastrointestinal disorders such as abdominal pain, heartburn, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, and vomiting. The number of participants with gastrointestinal disorders for each treatment group has been summarized.
Number of Participants With KeratopathyUp to Day 180Ophthalmic assessments were carried out at pre-qualified sites (Manaus) prior to randomization and at Days 29 and 90 and at withdrawal. Assessments were carried out at Day 180 if the Day 90 assessments showed abnormalities. The last assessment performed on the day of randomization or earlier was considered Baseline. The number of participants displaying keratopathy in each eye was summarized for each visit. The number of participants with new keratopathy at any time post Baseline was also reported. Ophthalmic Safety Population comprised of all participants in the Safety Population who have results from any eye assessments. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Incidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresUp to Day 180Ophthalmic assessments were carried out at pre-qualified sites (Manaus) prior to randomization and at Days 29 and 90 and at withdrawal. Assessments were carried out at Day 180 if the Day 90 assessments showed abnormalities. The last assessment performed on the day of randomization or earlier was considered Baseline. Best corrected visual acuity was assessed individually for each eye. Scores were recorded as a ratio. The values were used to derive a logMAR score for statistical analysis where logMAR=-1x log10 (ratio score). The mean and standard deviation of logMAR score for each treatment group has been summarized. High scores were associated with worse vision, and low scores with better vision. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Number of Participants With Recurrence-free Efficacy at 4 Months Post Dose4 months post doseA participant (par) was considered to have demonstrated recurrence-free efficacy at 4 months if: a) Par had non-zero P vivax asexual parasite count at Baseline. b) Par showed initial clearance of P vivax parasitemia. c) Par had no positive asexual P vivax parasite count at any assessment prior to or on Study Day 130 following initial parasite clearance. d) Par did not take a concomitant medication with anti-malarial activity at any point between Study Day 1 and their last parasite assessment after Study Day 109 (up to and including Study Day 130). e) Par is parasite-free at 4 months defined as a negative asexual P vivax parasite count at the first parasite assessment performed after Study Day 109 (up to and including Study Day 130). Par were censored if they did not have P.vivax at Baseline, or took a drug with anti-malarial action despite not having malaria parasites or did not have a 4 month assessment. The number of par with recurrence-free efficacy at 4 months has been summarized.
Number of Participants With TEAEs and Serious TEAEsUp to Day 180An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant under clinical investigation, temporarily associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/ birth defect, other situations and is associated with possible drug induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinemia. TEAEs is defined as AEs with an onset date and time on or after that of the start of first dose of study medication (including CQ). Number of participants with TEAEs and serious TEAEs have been presented.
Number of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensityUp to Day 180An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant under clinical investigation, temporarily associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. TEAE is defined as AEs with an onset date and time on or after that of the start of first dose of study medication (including CQ). Number of participants with AEs based on severity has been presented.
Number of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeUp to Day 120Blood samples were collected for the evaluation of hematology parameters including eosinophils, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets, reticulocytes and methemoglobin. The number of participants with hematology laboratory data outside the extended normal range (F3) was presented. The upper and lower limits for F3 range were defined by multiplying the normal range limits by different factors. High and low indicated that the participants had values flagged as high and low respectively for the particular parameter any time on-treatment. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeUp to Day 120Blood samples were collected for the evaluation of clinical chemistry parameters including Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (Alk. Phos), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, creatine kinase, creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), indirect bilirubin and urea. The number of participants with clinical chemistry laboratory data outside the extended normal range (F3) was presented. The upper and lower limits for F3 range were defined by multiplying the normal range limits by different factors. High and low indicated that the participants had values flagged as high and low respectively for the particular parameter any time on-treatment. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Cost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaUp to Day 180Health outcomes were evaluated based on the total costs spent on treatment, transport, medication and tests. The cost was summarized according to the place at which the participant went to for care (drug shop, trial clinic, other clinic, hospital (inpatient/outpatient), traditional healer, other). The reported costs by type and by site has been summarized. Where costs have not been reported at a visit, the number of participants analyzed is given as 0. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Cost Incurred With Purchase of Medications Associated With Recurrence Episode of MalariaUp to Day 180Health outcomes were evaluated based on the cost of medications purchased. The reported total medication cost for paracetamol associated with recurrence episode of P vivax malaria has been reported by site. Where costs have not been reported at a visit, the number of participants analyzed is given as 0. Medications recorded as Other and medications without costs are excluded from the analysis. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Time Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationUp to Day 180Health outcomes were evaluated based on total time lost by participants or care givers due to an episode of malaria. The reported time lost due to recurrence episode of P vivax malaria has been summarized by category and by site. Where categories by site have not been reported at a visit, the number of participants analyzed is given as 0. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Number of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaUp to Day 180Health outcomes were evaluated based on the actions taken by the participants to treat recurrence episode of P vivax malaria. The reported action taken by site is summarized. Where no action by site have been reported at a visit, the number of participants analyzed is given as 0. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Oral Clearance (CL/F) of TQDay 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 60Apparent population oral clearance of TQ
Volume of Distribution (Vc/F) of TQDay 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 60Apparent population central volume of distribution of TQ
Number of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineBaseline and up to Day 180Ophthalmic assessments were carried out at pre-qualified sites (Manaus) prior to randomization and at Days 29 and 90 and at withdrawal. Assessments were carried out at Day 180 if the Day 90 assessments showed abnormalities. The last assessment performed on the day of randomization or earlier was considered Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post Baseline assessment minus the Baseline assessment. The number of participants with definite retinal change and questionable (ques) retinal change from Baseline was presented. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Countries

Bangladesh, Brazil, Cambodia, Ethiopia, India, Peru, Philippines, Thailand

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of tafenoquine (TQ) in participants with Plasmodium vivax (P vivax) malaria. TAF112582 consisted of two parts-Part 1 (Phase 2 dose ranging) and Part 2 (Phase 3 pivotal). Results have been presented for Part 2.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 683 participants were screened of which 161 failed screening and 522 participants were randomized to receive chloroquine (CQ) + 300 milligrams (mg) TQ, CQ + 15 mg primaquine (PQ) and CQ alone regimen in a ratio of 2:1:1.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CQ Only
Participants were administered a single oral dose of CQ 600 mg on Days 1 and 2 and CQ 300 mg on Day 3. TQ placebo was administered on Day 1 or Day 2. PQ placebo capsule was administered once daily for 14 days starting from either Day 1 or Day 2.
133
TQ + CQ
Participants were administered a single oral dose of CQ 600 mg on Days 1 and Day 2 and CQ 300 mg on Day 3. Participants were dosed with TQ 300 mg either on Day 1 or Day 2. PQ placebo capsule was administered once daily for 14 days starting from either Day 1 or Day 2.
260
PQ + CQ
Participants were administered a single oral dose of CQ 600 mg on Days 1 and 2 and CQ 300 mg on Day 3. Participants were dosed with TQ placebo either on Day 1 or Day 2 and PQ 15 mg was administered once daily for 14 days starting from either Day 1 or Day 2.
129
Total522

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up242
Overall StudyPhysician Decision110
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject154

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCQ OnlyTQ + CQPQ + CQTotal
Age, Continuous35.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.23
35.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.39
34.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.26
35.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.29
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American(Amer) Indian(Ind) or Alaska(Al) Native(N)
43 Participants81 Participants41 Participants165 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian-South East Asian (A) Heritage (Her)
26 Participants50 Participants26 Participants102 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African (Afr) Amer
14 Participants28 Participants13 Participants55 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple-Afr Amer/Afr Her/Amer Ind or Al N
47 Participants95 Participants47 Participants189 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple-Afr Amer/Afr Her/White-White/Cau/Eur Her
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple-Amer Ind or Al N/A-Central/South A Her
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White-White/Caucasian(Cau)/European(Eur) Her
3 Participants4 Participants2 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants64 Participants30 Participants130 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
97 Participants196 Participants99 Participants392 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1330 / 2600 / 129
other
Total, other adverse events
72 / 133119 / 26056 / 129
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 13321 / 2604 / 129

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Recurrence-free Efficacy at 6 Months Post Dose

A participant was considered to have demonstrated recurrence-free efficacy at 6 months if: a) Participant had non-zero P vivax asexual parasite count at Baseline. b) Participant showed initial clearance of P vivax parasitemia defined as two negative asexual P vivax parasite counts, with at least 6 hours between the counts, and no positive counts in the interval. c) Participant had no positive asexual P vivax parasite count at any assessment prior to or on Study Day 201 following initial parasite clearance. d) Participant did not take a concomitant medication with anti-malarial activity at any point between Study Day 1 and their last parasite assessment. e) Participant is parasite-free at 6 months. Participants were censored if they did not have P.vivax at Baseline, or took a drug with anti-malarial action despite not having malaria parasites, or did not have a 6 month assessment. The number of participants with recurrence-free efficacy at 6 months has been summarized.

Time frame: 6 months post dose

Population: Microbiologic intent to treat (mITT) Population-all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, who have at least one P vivax parasite assessment after randomization, and who have a positive parasite smear for P vivax at Baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Recurrence-free Efficacy at 6 Months Post Dose35 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Recurrence-free Efficacy at 6 Months Post Dose155 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Recurrence-free Efficacy at 6 Months Post Dose83 Participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.222, 0.404]Cox Proportional Hazards Model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.178, 0.387]Cox Proportional Hazards Model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.152, 0.382]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.117, 0.335]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percent Methemoglobin

Methemoglobin assessment was made with the aid of a non-invasive signal extraction pulse CO-Oximeter handheld machine (Masimo). The change from Baseline in percent methemoglobin by treatment, time and sex has been summarized. The last assessment performed prior to the first dose of study medication (CQ or randomized treatment) was considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post baseline assessment minus the Baseline assessment for percent methemoglobin. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Day 120

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 29, Male-0.10 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.428
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 8, Female-0.16 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.857
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 2, Male-0.18 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.525
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 22, Female-0.05 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.467
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 11, Male-0.07 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.348
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 3, Female-0.20 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.902
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 22, Male0.07 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.211
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 11, Female-0.13 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.676
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 120, Female0.10 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.332
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 15, Female-0.08 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.684
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 15, Male0.12 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.404
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 60, Female0.19 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.08
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 5, Male-0.28 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.329
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 120, Male0.20 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.783
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 60, Male0.44 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.925
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 5, Female-0.20 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.789
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 3, Male-0.15 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.256
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 29, Female-0.18 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.927
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 8, Male-0.12 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.135
CQ OnlyChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 2, Female-0.22 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.895
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 60, Female0.03 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.7
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 2, Male-0.03 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.246
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 2, Female0.10 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.83
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 3, Male-0.01 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.254
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 3, Female0.26 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.781
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 5, Male0.42 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.633
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 5, Female1.37 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.263
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 8, Male0.98 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.87
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 8, Female2.04 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.716
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 11, Male1.17 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 2.074
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 11, Female2.13 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.667
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 15, Male0.94 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.963
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 15, Female1.67 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.349
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 22, Male0.54 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.431
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 22, Female0.93 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.042
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 29, Male0.23 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.35
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 29, Female0.24 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.717
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 60, Male-0.10 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.362
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 120, Male0.07 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.503
TQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 120, Female-0.03 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.906
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 2, Female-0.01 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.438
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 22, Female1.86 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.494
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 8, Male3.01 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 3.214
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 120, Female0.37 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.552
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 29, Male0.58 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.835
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 5, Female0.90 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.885
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 120, Male0.37 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 2.153
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 29, Female0.49 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.502
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 5, Male1.28 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 2.619
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 2, Male-0.10 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.372
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 60, Male0.20 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.94
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 3, Female0.11 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.443
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 15, Male3.51 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 3.369
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 11, Female3.41 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 2.659
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 3, Male-0.02 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.454
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 15, Female3.63 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 2.678
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 11, Male3.61 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 3.498
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 60, Female0.16 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.62
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 22, Male1.96 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 2.401
PQ + CQChange From Baseline in Percent MethemoglobinDay 8, Female2.58 Percent MethemoglobinStandard Deviation 2.565
Secondary

Cost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax Malaria

Health outcomes were evaluated based on the total costs spent on treatment, transport, medication and tests. The cost was summarized according to the place at which the participant went to for care (drug shop, trial clinic, other clinic, hospital (inpatient/outpatient), traditional healer, other). The reported costs by type and by site has been summarized. Where costs have not been reported at a visit, the number of participants analyzed is given as 0. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Time frame: Up to Day 180

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CQ OnlyCost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru (Other location for care)0.72 US Dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 0.41
CQ OnlyCost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaBrazil (Drug shop for care)4.76 US Dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 3.24
CQ OnlyCost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaBrazil (Enrollment clinic for care)6.17 US Dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 2.39
CQ OnlyCost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru (Attended another clinic)2.71 US Dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 4.69
CQ OnlyCost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaThailand (Drug shop for care)4.60 US Dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 0
CQ OnlyCost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaThailand (Enrollment clinic for care)19.15 US Dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 10.6
CQ OnlyCost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaThailand (In-hospital care)6.13 US Dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 0
CQ OnlyCost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaBrazil (other location for care)4.23 US Dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 0
CQ OnlyCost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru (Drug shop for care)1.47 US Dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 1.3
CQ OnlyCost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru (Enrollment clinic for care)8.78 US Dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 7.94
TQ + CQCost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaBrazil (Enrollment clinic for care)6.15 US Dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 2.14
TQ + CQCost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru (Enrollment clinic for care)8.54 US Dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 8.52
TQ + CQCost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru (Other location for care)1.30 US Dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 0
TQ + CQCost Associated With Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru (Attended another clinic)3.94 US Dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 1.42
Secondary

Cost Incurred With Purchase of Medications Associated With Recurrence Episode of Malaria

Health outcomes were evaluated based on the cost of medications purchased. The reported total medication cost for paracetamol associated with recurrence episode of P vivax malaria has been reported by site. Where costs have not been reported at a visit, the number of participants analyzed is given as 0. Medications recorded as Other and medications without costs are excluded from the analysis. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Time frame: Up to Day 180

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CQ OnlyCost Incurred With Purchase of Medications Associated With Recurrence Episode of MalariaPeru, n=23, 30.49 USDStandard Deviation 0.1941
CQ OnlyCost Incurred With Purchase of Medications Associated With Recurrence Episode of MalariaBrazil, n=6, 01.70 USDStandard Deviation 0.144
TQ + CQCost Incurred With Purchase of Medications Associated With Recurrence Episode of MalariaPeru, n=23, 30.32 USDStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Incidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test Scores

Ophthalmic assessments were carried out at pre-qualified sites (Manaus) prior to randomization and at Days 29 and 90 and at withdrawal. Assessments were carried out at Day 180 if the Day 90 assessments showed abnormalities. The last assessment performed on the day of randomization or earlier was considered Baseline. Best corrected visual acuity was assessed individually for each eye. Scores were recorded as a ratio. The values were used to derive a logMAR score for statistical analysis where logMAR=-1x log10 (ratio score). The mean and standard deviation of logMAR score for each treatment group has been summarized. High scores were associated with worse vision, and low scores with better vision. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Time frame: Up to Day 180

Population: Ophthalmic Safety Population. Day 180 was not a required follow up assessment, hence, data was not collected for most participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CQ OnlyIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresBaseline; left eye0.048 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.0859
CQ OnlyIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 29; left eye0.032 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.058
CQ OnlyIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 29; right eye0.039 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.0906
CQ OnlyIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 90; left eye0.041 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.0599
CQ OnlyIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 90; right eye0.044 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.0928
CQ OnlyIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresBaseline; right eye0.041 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.0825
TQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresBaseline; left eye0.039 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.0652
TQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresBaseline; right eye0.046 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.1045
TQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 90; right eye0.038 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.1083
TQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 90; left eye0.028 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.0971
TQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 180; right eye0.033 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.0577
TQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 29; right eye0.049 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.1159
TQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 180; left eye0.033 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.0577
TQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 29; left eye0.032 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.0565
PQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 180; left eye0.000 logMAR scores
PQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresBaseline; right eye0.029 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.0461
PQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresBaseline; left eye0.048 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.1306
PQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 29; right eye0.021 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.0412
PQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 29; left eye0.045 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.1325
PQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 90; right eye0.016 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.0374
PQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 90; left eye0.041 logMAR scoresStandard Deviation 0.1303
PQ + CQIncidence of Visual Field Abnormalities Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity Test ScoresDay 180; right eye0.000 logMAR scores
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Received Blood Transfusion

The number of participants who received blood transfusion as a result of hemoglobin decline has been summarized.

Time frame: Up to Day 180

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants Who Received Blood Transfusion0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants Who Received Blood Transfusion0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants Who Received Blood Transfusion0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax Malaria

Health outcomes were evaluated based on the actions taken by the participants to treat recurrence episode of P vivax malaria. The reported action taken by site is summarized. Where no action by site have been reported at a visit, the number of participants analyzed is given as 0. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Time frame: Up to Day 180

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaThailand, In hospital1 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaBrazil, Nothing21 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaBrazil, Drug shop2 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaBrazil, Trial clinic62 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaBrazil, Other2 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaCambodia, Nothing13 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaEthiopia, Nothing12 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaEthiopia, Other1 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaEthiopia, Trial clinic0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru, Nothing1 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru, Drug shop8 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru, Trial clinic61 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru, Another clinic10 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru, Other15 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPhilippines, Nothing1 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaThailand, Nothing1 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaThailand, Drug shop1 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaThailand, Trial clinic13 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaEthiopia, Another clinic1 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru, Nothing0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaBrazil, Nothing5 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaThailand, Drug shop0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaBrazil, Drug shop0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru, Drug shop0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaBrazil, Trial clinic76 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaThailand, In hospital0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaBrazil, Other0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru, Trial clinic63 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaCambodia, Nothing14 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaThailand, Nothing16 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaEthiopia, Nothing13 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaEthiopia, Another clinic0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru, Another clinic54 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaEthiopia, Other0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaThailand, Trial clinic0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaEthiopia, Trial clinic1 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Action Taken to Treat Recurrence Episode of P Vivax MalariaPeru, Other1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Acute Renal Failure

There were no participants with acute renal failure in the study.

Time frame: Up to Day 180

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Acute Renal Failure0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Acute Renal Failure0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Acute Renal Failure0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference Range

Blood samples were collected for the evaluation of clinical chemistry parameters including Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (Alk. Phos), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, creatine kinase, creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), indirect bilirubin and urea. The number of participants with clinical chemistry laboratory data outside the extended normal range (F3) was presented. The upper and lower limits for F3 range were defined by multiplying the normal range limits by different factors. High and low indicated that the participants had values flagged as high and low respectively for the particular parameter any time on-treatment. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Time frame: Up to Day 120

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeCreatine kinase, High8 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeALT, High11 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeGFR, Low0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeCreatinine, High0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeAlk Phos, High3 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeUrea, High42 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBilirubin, High18 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeAST, High5 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeIndirect bilirubin11 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeCreatinine, High1 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeAlk Phos, High1 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeAST, High7 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBilirubin, High23 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeCreatine kinase, High5 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeGFR, Low1 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeIndirect bilirubin22 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeUrea, High85 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeALT, High10 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBilirubin, High12 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeAlk Phos, High1 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeIndirect bilirubin8 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeAST, High2 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeALT, High5 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeCreatinine, High0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeCreatine kinase, High8 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeUrea, High46 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeGFR, Low0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Gastrointestinal Disorders

Gastrointestinal tolerability was analyzed by the number of par experiencing gastrointestinal disorders such as abdominal pain, heartburn, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, and vomiting. The number of participants with gastrointestinal disorders for each treatment group has been summarized.

Time frame: Up to Day 180

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersAbdominal pain5 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersDyspepsia5 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersVomiting9 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersAbdominal pain upper13 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersNausea12 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersDiarrhoea6 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersNausea21 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersAbdominal pain8 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersVomiting22 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersAbdominal pain upper11 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersDyspepsia6 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersDiarrhoea15 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersDyspepsia2 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersVomiting11 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersAbdominal pain upper7 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersDiarrhoea5 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersAbdominal pain6 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Gastrointestinal DisordersNausea9 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference Range

Blood samples were collected for the evaluation of hematology parameters including eosinophils, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets, reticulocytes and methemoglobin. The number of participants with hematology laboratory data outside the extended normal range (F3) was presented. The upper and lower limits for F3 range were defined by multiplying the normal range limits by different factors. High and low indicated that the participants had values flagged as high and low respectively for the particular parameter any time on-treatment. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Time frame: Up to Day 120

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood eosinophils, High18 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood leukocytes, Low0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood lymphocytes, Low7 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood lymphocytes, High23 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood neutrophils, Low2 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood platelets, Low14 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood reticulocytes, High72 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeMethemoglobin, High4 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood lymphocytes, Low4 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood reticulocytes, High141 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood lymphocytes, High32 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood neutrophils, Low5 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood platelets, Low35 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood eosinophils, High38 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood leukocytes, Low3 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeMethemoglobin, High5 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood lymphocytes, Low0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood leukocytes, Low2 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood eosinophils, High28 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood lymphocytes, High13 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood reticulocytes, High85 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood platelets, Low15 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeBlood neutrophils, Low7 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Data Outside the Reference RangeMethemoglobin, High11 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Hemoglobin Decline From Baseline Over First 29 Days

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD) deficiency is known to be a risk factor for hemolysis in participants treated with 8-aminoquinolines. Blood samples were collected for the evaluation of hemoglobin levels. Hemoglobin decreases of \>=30% or \>3 grams/deciliter (g/dL) from Baseline; or, an overall drop in hemoglobin below 6.0 g/dL in the first 15 days of the study were considered as protocol defined serious adverse events (SAEs). Number of participants with maximum hemoglobin decline from Baseline over first 29 days of study has been summarized. Safety Population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Day 29

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Hemoglobin Decline From Baseline Over First 29 Days>20g/L to <=30 g/L11 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Hemoglobin Decline From Baseline Over First 29 Days<=20 grams/liter (g/L)120 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Hemoglobin Decline From Baseline Over First 29 Days>30 g/L or >=30%2 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hemoglobin Decline From Baseline Over First 29 Days>20g/L to <=30 g/L31 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hemoglobin Decline From Baseline Over First 29 Days<=20 grams/liter (g/L)214 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hemoglobin Decline From Baseline Over First 29 Days>30 g/L or >=30%14 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hemoglobin Decline From Baseline Over First 29 Days<=20 grams/liter (g/L)114 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hemoglobin Decline From Baseline Over First 29 Days>30 g/L or >=30%3 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Hemoglobin Decline From Baseline Over First 29 Days>20g/L to <=30 g/L12 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Keratopathy

Ophthalmic assessments were carried out at pre-qualified sites (Manaus) prior to randomization and at Days 29 and 90 and at withdrawal. Assessments were carried out at Day 180 if the Day 90 assessments showed abnormalities. The last assessment performed on the day of randomization or earlier was considered Baseline. The number of participants displaying keratopathy in each eye was summarized for each visit. The number of participants with new keratopathy at any time post Baseline was also reported. Ophthalmic Safety Population comprised of all participants in the Safety Population who have results from any eye assessments. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Time frame: Up to Day 180

Population: Ophthalmic Safety Population. Day 180 was not a required follow up assessment, hence, data was not collected for most participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 90; right eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With KeratopathyBaseline; right eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 90; left eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 1; right eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With KeratopathyAny time post Baseline; right eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With KeratopathyAny time post Baseline; left eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 29; right eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 1; left eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With KeratopathyBaseline; left eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 29; left eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyAny time post Baseline; left eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 90; right eye1 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyBaseline; right eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 29; left eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 1; left eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 90; left eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 180; left eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 180; right eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 29; right eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyAny time post Baseline; right eye1 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 1; right eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyBaseline; left eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyAny time post Baseline; left eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 180; right eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 90; left eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyBaseline; right eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyBaseline; left eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 1; right eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 1; left eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 29; right eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 29; left eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 90; right eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyDay 180; left eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With KeratopathyAny time post Baseline; right eye0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Recurrence-free Efficacy at 4 Months Post Dose

A participant (par) was considered to have demonstrated recurrence-free efficacy at 4 months if: a) Par had non-zero P vivax asexual parasite count at Baseline. b) Par showed initial clearance of P vivax parasitemia. c) Par had no positive asexual P vivax parasite count at any assessment prior to or on Study Day 130 following initial parasite clearance. d) Par did not take a concomitant medication with anti-malarial activity at any point between Study Day 1 and their last parasite assessment after Study Day 109 (up to and including Study Day 130). e) Par is parasite-free at 4 months defined as a negative asexual P vivax parasite count at the first parasite assessment performed after Study Day 109 (up to and including Study Day 130). Par were censored if they did not have P.vivax at Baseline, or took a drug with anti-malarial action despite not having malaria parasites or did not have a 4 month assessment. The number of par with recurrence-free efficacy at 4 months has been summarized.

Time frame: 4 months post dose

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Recurrence-free Efficacy at 4 Months Post Dose47 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Recurrence-free Efficacy at 4 Months Post Dose177 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Recurrence-free Efficacy at 4 Months Post Dose90 Participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.195, 0.376]Cox Proportional Hazards Model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.167, 0.39]Cox Proportional Hazards Model
Secondary

Number of Participants With Retinal Changes From Baseline

Ophthalmic assessments were carried out at pre-qualified sites (Manaus) prior to randomization and at Days 29 and 90 and at withdrawal. Assessments were carried out at Day 180 if the Day 90 assessments showed abnormalities. The last assessment performed on the day of randomization or earlier was considered Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post Baseline assessment minus the Baseline assessment. The number of participants with definite retinal change and questionable (ques) retinal change from Baseline was presented. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Day 180

Population: Ophthalmic Safety Population. Day 180 was not a required follow up assessment, hence, data was not collected for most participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 90, Definite change, right eye1 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 180, Ques change, left eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 180, Definite change, right eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 90, Ques change, right eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 29, Definite change, left eye1 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 90, Ques change, left eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 90, Definite change, left eye1 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 29, Ques change, right eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 180, Definite change, left eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 29, Ques change, left eye0 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 29, Definite change, right eye1 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 180, Ques change, right eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 180, Ques change, left eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 29, Definite change, right eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 29, Ques change, right eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 29, Definite change, left eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 29, Ques change, left eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 90, Definite change, right eye1 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 90, Ques change, right eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 90, Definite change, left eye1 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 90, Ques change, left eye1 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 180, Definite change, right eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 180, Ques change, right eye0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 180, Definite change, left eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 90, Definite change, right eye1 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 29, Definite change, right eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 29, Ques change, left eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 29, Ques change, right eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 90, Definite change, left eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 90, Ques change, right eye1 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 29, Definite change, left eye0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Retinal Changes From BaselineDay 90, Ques change, left eye2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With TEAEs and Serious TEAEs

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant under clinical investigation, temporarily associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/ birth defect, other situations and is associated with possible drug induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinemia. TEAEs is defined as AEs with an onset date and time on or after that of the start of first dose of study medication (including CQ). Number of participants with TEAEs and serious TEAEs have been presented.

Time frame: Up to Day 180

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With TEAEs and Serious TEAEsTEAEs86 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With TEAEs and Serious TEAEsSerious TEAEs6 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With TEAEs and Serious TEAEsTEAEs164 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With TEAEs and Serious TEAEsSerious TEAEs21 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With TEAEs and Serious TEAEsTEAEs76 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With TEAEs and Serious TEAEsSerious TEAEs4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum Intensity

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant under clinical investigation, temporarily associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. TEAE is defined as AEs with an onset date and time on or after that of the start of first dose of study medication (including CQ). Number of participants with AEs based on severity has been presented.

Time frame: Up to Day 180

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensityGrade 41 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensitySevere or Grade 33 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensityModerate or Grade 252 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensityGrade 50 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensityMild or Grade 130 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensitySevere or Grade 32 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensityMild or Grade 170 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensityModerate or Grade 289 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensityGrade 40 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensityGrade 51 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensityGrade 50 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensityGrade 40 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensityMild or Grade 138 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensitySevere or Grade 31 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum IntensityModerate or Grade 237 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Potentially Related to Hemoglobin Decrease

TEAEs are defined as adverse events (AEs) with an onset date and time on or after that of the start of first dose of study medication (including CQ). The number of participants with TEAEs potentially related to hemoglobin decrease has been presented.

Time frame: Up to Day 180

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Potentially Related to Hemoglobin DecreaseHaemoglobin decreased2 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Potentially Related to Hemoglobin DecreaseFatigue2 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Potentially Related to Hemoglobin DecreaseHyperbilirubinaemia1 Participants
CQ OnlyNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Potentially Related to Hemoglobin DecreasePallor0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Potentially Related to Hemoglobin DecreasePallor1 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Potentially Related to Hemoglobin DecreaseHaemoglobin decreased14 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Potentially Related to Hemoglobin DecreaseHyperbilirubinaemia0 Participants
TQ + CQNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Potentially Related to Hemoglobin DecreaseFatigue1 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Potentially Related to Hemoglobin DecreasePallor0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Potentially Related to Hemoglobin DecreaseFatigue0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Potentially Related to Hemoglobin DecreaseHyperbilirubinaemia0 Participants
PQ + CQNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Potentially Related to Hemoglobin DecreaseHaemoglobin decreased2 Participants
Secondary

Oral Clearance (CL/F) of TQ

Apparent population oral clearance of TQ

Time frame: Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 60

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CQ OnlyOral Clearance (CL/F) of TQ2.96 Liters per hour
Secondary

Time Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal Occupation

Health outcomes were evaluated based on total time lost by participants or care givers due to an episode of malaria. The reported time lost due to recurrence episode of P vivax malaria has been summarized by category and by site. Where categories by site have not been reported at a visit, the number of participants analyzed is given as 0. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Time frame: Up to Day 180

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationEthiopia, Other1 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationEthiopia, Housework4 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationPeru, Housework24 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationBrazil, Other3 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationPeru, Farming19 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationEthiopia, Farming2.5 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationPeru, Student1 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationBrazil, paid employment8 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationPeru, Paid employment6 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationEthiopia, Student3 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationPeru, Other26 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationCambodia, Farming17 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationPhilippines, Farming0 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationThailand, paid employment20 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationEthiopia, Paid employment2 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationThailand, Other1 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationBrazil, Housework1 Days
CQ OnlyTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationBrazil, Farming8 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationThailand, Other0 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationBrazil, Housework0 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationBrazil, Farming0 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationBrazil, paid employment0 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationBrazil, Other5 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationCambodia, Farming24 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationEthiopia, Housework3 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationEthiopia, Farming3 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationEthiopia, Student0 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationEthiopia, Paid employment4 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationEthiopia, Other7 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationPeru, Housework29 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationPeru, Farming28 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationPeru, Student6 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationPeru, Paid employment8.5 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationPeru, Other32 Days
TQ + CQTime Lost by Participants or Care Givers From Normal OccupationThailand, paid employment0 Days
Secondary

Time to Fever Clearance

Fever clearance time was defined as time from first dose of treatment to the time when body temperature falls to normal within Study Days 1-4 and remains normal for at least 48 hours up to the Day 8 visit. Fever clearance was considered to have been achieved once an initial temperature of more than 37.40 degree Celsius is reduced to a value less than or equal to 37.40 degree Celsius and in the absence of value more than 37.40 degree Celsius in the following 48 hours up to the Day 8 visit. The time taken to achieve fever clearance was analyzed using Kaplan Meier Methodology. The median fever clearance time along with 95% confidence interval has been presented for each treatment group.

Time frame: Up to Day 180

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CQ OnlyTime to Fever Clearance7 Hours
TQ + CQTime to Fever Clearance7 Hours
PQ + CQTime to Fever Clearance8 Hours
Secondary

Time to Parasite Clearance

Parasite clearance time was defined as time needed to clear asexual parasite from the blood that is, parasite numbers falling below the limit of detection in the thick blood smear and remaining undetectable after 6 to 12 hours. The time taken to achieve parasite clearance was analyzed using Kaplan Meier Methodology. The median parasite clearance time along with 95% confidence interval has been presented for each treatment group.

Time frame: Up to Day 180

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CQ OnlyTime to Parasite Clearance43 Hours
TQ + CQTime to Parasite Clearance45 Hours
PQ + CQTime to Parasite Clearance42 Hours
Secondary

Time to Recurrence of P Vivax Malaria

Recurrence was defined as the first confirmed presence of P vivax asexual stage parasites after clearance of initial parasitemia following CQ treatment. Time to recurrence was defined as the time (in days) from initial parasite clearance to recurrence. The time to recurrence was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. NA indicates data was not available due to insufficient number of participants with events during the follow up period in the study. The median number of days to recurrence along with 95% confidence interval has been presented for each treatment group.

Time frame: Up to Day 180

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CQ OnlyTime to Recurrence of P Vivax Malaria86 Days
TQ + CQTime to Recurrence of P Vivax MalariaNA Days
PQ + CQTime to Recurrence of P Vivax MalariaNA Days
Secondary

Volume of Distribution (Vc/F) of TQ

Apparent population central volume of distribution of TQ

Time frame: Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 60

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CQ OnlyVolume of Distribution (Vc/F) of TQ915 Liters

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026