Skip to content

Body Movement Imitation and Perspective Perception Among Psychiatric Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01375894
Enrollment
60
Registered
2011-06-17
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2012-01-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression, Schizophrenia

Brief summary

The ability to understand the other's perspective and respond accordingly is the most important normal process of daily social life and is probably one of the foundations of human existence. This capability is reflected, inter alia, as an imitation - an important and effective form of learning which is very developed in humans. When we are required to imitate a particular movement, speed of response depends on the perspective of the movement. Imitative response is implemented faster when the movement is observed from first-person perspective, than if the motion is presented from the perspective of a third party. While healthy individuals don't find it difficult to imitate, or to understand the other's emotion expression, there are psychiatric populations (such as autism and schizophrenia) who find it difficult to demonstrate these capabilities (Park, Matthews et al. 2008). Beyond these capabilities impairment, schizophrenic patients have difficulty distinguishing between their arm movements and those of a foreign hand and find it difficult to leave the boundaries of egocentric interpretation of reality and adopt the other's point of view. These behavioral disorders arise from defects in the network of mirror neurons (Buccino and Amore 2008; Langdon, Coltheart et al. 2010). Therefore, the investigator expect that schizophrenic patients will not see a preference for movements that will be displayed in first-person perspective from the same movements that will be displayed from the perspective of a third party. Consequently, the investigator speculate that these subjects will not exhibit differences at imitating the response of which will be presented from different perspectives (Jackson, Meltzoff et (al. 2006.

Interventions

DEVICEimitation assessment using the 5-dt data glove.

measuring the speed of the hand during imitation

Sponsors

Shalvata Mental Health Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Men and women aged 20-65. 2. Subjects who met the criteria for diagnosis of major DSM-IV for schizophrenia or unipolar depression. 3. Subjects with normal or corrected vision. 4. Subjects who sign informed consent for their participation in the experiment

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with acute disorder, or an unstable patient. Especially neurological disorders or head injuries. 2. Drug Abuse in the past year. 3. Lack of jurisdiction, such as people with mental retardation or dementia. 4. assessed with high suicide risk. 5. patients which are Compulsory hospitalized. 6. Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
speed of hand movement according to the reaction glove30 minutes

Countries

Israel

Contacts

Primary ContactHilik Levkovitz, prof.
ylevk@clalit.org.il09-7478644

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026