Skip to content

Whole-body Vibration Training in Older People

Neuromuscular Training With Whole Body Vibration in Older People: A Randomized Multicentre Clinical Trial With Blinded to Evaluator

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01375790
Acronym
GERIAPLAT
Enrollment
160
Registered
2011-06-17
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2012-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging

Keywords

whole-body vibration, older people, exercise, body balance, muscle performance, falls, physiotherapy

Brief summary

This is a randomized, multicentre, and parallel clinical trial with blinded to evaluator. The principal hypothesis is that whole-body vibration training plus exercise improves the body balance and prevents falls more than only exercise training in institutionalized older people. The number needed of patients is 160 (80 per group).

Interventions

DEVICEExercise with Whole-body vibration platform

The participants will perform static/dynamic exercises (balance and resistance training) on a vibratory platform (Frequency: 30-35 Hz; Amplitude: 2-4 mm).

OTHERExercise

The participants will perform the same static/dynamic exercises (balance and resistance training) like WBV group but without the vibration stimuli.

Sponsors

Asociacion Colaboracion Cochrane Iberoamericana
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Institutionalized older people who were 65 years and older * The patient consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Residents who present an acute disease that not resolved during 10 days. * Residents with a pacemaker (or serious cardiac alterations) * Residents with epilepsy * Residents with a high risk of thromboembolism * Residents with a history of a hip or knee joint replacement * Residents who not were musculoskeletal disorders and cognitive or physical dysfunction that interfering with test and training procedures. * Residents that not accept to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Body balance.at 6 weeksBody balance will be evaluated using Tinetti Test, and Timed up and go test

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of fallsduring 6 monthsFall: an unexpected event in which the participants come to rest on the ground, floor, or lower level.
Safety of interventionsDuring 6 monthsPain, headache, itching or soreness on the legs, erythema.
Body balanceat six monthsBody balance will be evaluated using Tinetti Test, and Timed up and go test
Muscle performanceat 6 weeks, and 6 monthsIt will be evaluated by five-sit-to-stand test, and Smartcoach Encoder.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026