Skip to content

Efficacy and Satisfaction Comparing Two Braces in the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) in Infants

Efficacy and Satisfaction Comparing Two Braces in the Treatment of DDH in Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01375218
Enrollment
30
Registered
2011-06-17
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2015-01-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Congenital Deformity of Hip Joint, Hip Dislocation, Congenital

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to 1) evaluate the effectiveness of the Plastizote abduction brace compared to the Pavlik harness in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and 2) compare parent/caregiver satisfaction between the Plastizote abduction brace and the Pavlik harness. The investigators hope to learn which brace treatment is best for a definable population so the appropriate brace can be chosen initially avoiding the time, expense, and frustration of a failed technique.

Interventions

OTHERPavlik Brace

Pavlik Brace

OTHERPlastizote Brace

Plastizote Brace

Sponsors

OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 2 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 0-2 months of age 2. Nonterratological developmental dysplasia of the hip diagnosed by physical exam and standard of care ultrasound

Exclusion criteria

1. Ages greater than 2 months 2. Neurological condition 3. Terratological congenital dysplasia of the hip diagnosed by physical exam and standard of care ultrasound 4. Chromosomal abnormality

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Resolution of instability3-4 week intervalNegative Barlow and Ortolani tests as well as improvement/normalization in ultrasound measured alpha angle and femoral head coverage

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Resolution of instability6 month intervalNegative Barlow and Ortolani tests as well as improvement/normalization in ultrasound measured alpha angle and femoral head coverage

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026