Skip to content

Efficacy of Sirolimus In Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

A Randomized Phase Ⅱ, Trial With Sirolimus-containing Versus mTOR-inhibitor Free Immunosuppression in Patients Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Exceeding Milan Criteria

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01374750
Acronym
Sirolimus
Enrollment
45
Registered
2011-06-16
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2016-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the anti-tumor effect of sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen in patients following living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding Milan criteria with respect to recurrence-free survival.

Detailed description

The Milan criteria were adopted in most of western countries for deceased donor allocation because they identify a subgroup of candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for whom transplant results are similar to those in patients transplanted for end- stage liver disease without HCC. There is a debate involving expanding the indications beyond the Milan criteria in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Some transplant surgeons argue that despite the poorer results, LDLT for advanced HCC may be justified, since donors voluntarily accept the risks of donor hepatectomy to dedicate a graft for HCC patients, who may otherwise have no effective treatment. Especially, in Korea where living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is commonly performed, the expansion of Milan criteria is inevitable. Sirolimus is a macrolide antibiotic produced by Streptomyces hygroscopic that has demonstrated potent immunosuppressive activity in a number of studies. The efficacy of sirolimus as immunosuppressives has been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials in kidney transplantation. The use of sirolimus in liver transplantation is rapidly increasing from the standpoint of reducing the conventional calcineurin inhibitor toxicity. Sirolimus emerged as an effective alternative for patients with renal insufficiency related to calcineurin inhibitor toxicity. In recent studies, no differences have been observed with respect to rejection or major complications.The use of sirolimus in transplant patients is associated with a dose-dependent increase in serum cholesterol and triglycerides that may require treatment. In recent studies in liver transplant recipients using sirolimus as part of a primary immunosuppressive regimen, the occurrence of acute cellular rejection is relatively low. There is data suggesting that sirolimus is associated with hepatic artery thrombosis. Numerous current studies have shown that sirolimus may have inhibitory effects on the development of cancer. Immunosuppressive agent with antineoplastic activity is inherently attractive in the setting of liver transplantation for HCC. If sirolimus shows some degree of anti-tumor effect in transplant recipients with advanced HCC, the indication of LDLT for advanced HCC can be expanded.Our hypothesis is that sirolimus based-regimen will improve the HCC recurrence free survival. If sirolimus-based protocol shows better recurrence free survival, the indication of LDLT for HCC can be expanded. LDLT can be one of the best treatment modalities for advanced HCC. The patients with advanced HCC can have benefit by liver transplantation.

Interventions

DRUGSirolimus

Sirolimus

DRUGm-TOR inhibitor free

calcineurin inhibitors

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: 1. Age ≥ 18 yrs and weight ≥ 40 kg. 2. Histologically proven HCC exceeding Milan criteria before randomization, regardless of the prior therapy 3. Signed and dated written informed consent 4. Lack of relevant

Exclusion criteria

5. Women who were of childbearing potential must have had a negative qualitative serum pregnancy test before Investigational agent administration and must have agreed to use a medically acceptable method of contraception during treatment period of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To evaluate recurrence-free survival3 yearsTo evaluate the anti-tumor effect of sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen in patients following living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding Milan criteria with respect to recurrence-free survival

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To evaluate the survival rate3 yearsThe recurrence is defined by tumor recurrence in imaging study. The recurrence free survival will be calculated by Kaplan-Meier method.
To evaluate the renal function3 yearsRenal function will be evaluated by calculated GFR (Cockcroft-Gault method) at postoperative 6month, 12month, 18month, 24month, 30month, and 36month.
To evaluate the safety with sirolimus3 yearsSafety of sirolimus will be evaluated by the comparison of proportion of patients with serious adverse events during the follow-up period between two groups (m-TOR goup vs. m-TOR free group). Other minor side effects will be monitored and compared between two groups as well.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026