Skip to content

Firebird 2 Versus Excel Sirolimus-eluting Stent in Treating Real-world Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Multicenter, Randomized, Non-inferiority Study of Firebird 2 Versus Excel Sirolimus-eluting Stent in Treating Real-world Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01373632
Acronym
FESTA
Enrollment
570
Registered
2011-06-15
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2011-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

significant stenosis (>70% of lumen stenosis), epicardial coronary arteries, clinical ischemic

Brief summary

Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) has been world-widely used in clinical practice in treating patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The efficacy and safety of Excel SES (JW Medical, Shandong, China, MA) with biodegradable polymer has been proved by several clinical trials. Here the investigators design a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical study in purpose of identifying the non-inferiority in the efficacy and safety in treating CAD patients by Firebird 2 SES (Microport, Shanghai) with durable polymer, comparing with Excel SES.

Interventions

DEVICEFirebird 2 sirolimus-eluting stent

the Firebird 2 sirolimus-eluting stent is a SES with durable polymer based on Co-Cr stent platform

DEVICEExcel sirolimus-eluting stent

the Excel sirolimus-eluting stent is a stent with biodegradable polymer (PLA) based on stainless steel (316L) stent platform

Sponsors

Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age \> 18 years * male or un-pregnant female * stenosis \> 70% in one of major the epicardial coronary arteries * no contra-indications of stent implantation * singed the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* acute myocardial infarction within one week * have contra-indications of stent implantation or can not tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy * no history of stent implantation within last one-year * received other brand coronary stent during index procedure * with no achievement of informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
in-stent late lumen loss at 9 months' angiographic follow-up9 monthspatients are planned to receive angiographic follow-up at 9 months after index procedure, and in-stent late lumen loss will be analyzed

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
target vessel failure2 years after index proceduredefined as the occurrence of any of the following within 1 and 2 years after the index procedure: death from cardiac causes, Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, or revascularizationof the target vessel (emergency or elective coronaryartery bypass grafting \[CABG\] or repeated percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty \[PTCA\]).

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026