Skip to content

Effects of the Breathe Technologies Ventilation System in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

A Pilot Study of the Physiologic Effects of Using the Breathe Technologies Noninvasive Open Ventilation System During Constant Work Rate Exercise in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01372462
Enrollment
15
Registered
2011-06-14
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2016-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

COPD, Ventilator, Constant work rate

Brief summary

Pilot study in 15 stable male subjects with severe-to-very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) to evaluate the effects of short term use of the Breathe Technologies noninvasive open ventilation (NIOV) system on respiratory mechanics during constant work rate exercise in subjects with severe COPD.

Detailed description

Study was a randomized double-blinded crossover design in which subjects completed a series of exercises at a constant work rate while using 1) Test noninvasive ventilation (NIOV) system powered by compressed air, 2) Test NIOV system powered by 100% oxygen, 3) nasal cannula oxygen, 4) nothing (Control). Subjects were assessed during constant work rate exercise as reflected by exercise duration, isotime oxygenation (SpO2), and isotime dyspnea score (Borg). Exercise sessions took place over 4 visits with each visit lasting approximately 5 hours.

Interventions

DEVICENIOV - Room Air

Noninvasive ventilation with device powered by compressed room air.

DEVICENIOV - Oxygen

Noninvasive ventilation with device powered by compressed medical (100%) oxygen.

Supplemental oxygen delivered using a standard nasal cannula connected to 100% medical oxygen.

Sponsors

Breathe Technologies, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult males, ≥ 40 years of age * Diagnosis of severe COPD (GOLD stage III or IV) defined as having a FEV1 \< 50% of predicted and an FEV1/FVC ratio \< 70% of predicted * Ventilatory limitation to exercise, documented by a VE/MVV \> 0.85 * SpO2 between 80% and 88% during incremental exercise testing on room air * Willingness and ability (after training) to exercise on a cycle ergometer * Willingness and ability to perform all other study related procedures and tasks * Ability to be properly fitted with the Breathe nasal mask * Ability to tolerate and be appropriately titrated on the Breathe ventilator (See Appendix E) * Ability to be properly fitted with an exercise mask * Fluency in written and spoken English * Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* History of acute exacerbation of COPD within 30 days of screening * History of serious epistaxis within 14 days of screening * Requirement of \> 5 LPM nasal O2 to maintain an SpO2 \> 90% while at rest * History of pneumothorax secondary to lung bullae * History of intolerance to supplemental oxygen * Musculoskeletal or other non-pulmonary impairment that limits exercise tolerance * Inability to achieve an optimal CWR level (4-7 minutes) during Study Visit 1R * Current participation in another interventional study or participation within 14 days of screening * Presence of any condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Principal Investigator may compromise the subject's safety or the quality of the study data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exercise Duration for Constant Work Rate Exercise Tests Under 4 Test ConditionsStudy days 1,2,3, and 4; Day 1 for no treatment; day 2 for no treatment and NIOV - Room Air and NIOV - oxygen; Day 3 for no treatment and NIOV - Room Air and NIOV - oxygen; Day 4 for NIOV - oxygen and Nasal Cannula Oxygen.Mean differences between NIOV - oxygen, NIOV - Room Air, Nasal Cannula Oxygen, and no treatment (control).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SpO2 During Constant Workrate Exercise at IsotimeOutcome was measured in each of the Study day 1,2, 3 and 4. Study days 1,2,3, and 4; Day 1 for no treatment; day 2 for no treatment and NIOV - Room Air and NIOV - oxygen; Day 3 for no treatment and NIOV - Room Air and NIOV - oxygen; Day 4 for NIOV - oxygMean differences between NIOV - oxygen, NIOV - Room Air, Nasal Cannula Oxygen, and no treatment (control).
Borg Dyspnea Score During Constant Workrate Exercise at IsotimeOutcome was measured in each Study day 1,2,3 and 4. Study days 1,2,3, and 4; Day 1 for no treatment; day 2 for no treatment and NIOV - Room Air and NIOV - oxygen; Day 3 for no treatment and NIOV - Room Air and NIOV - oxygen; Day 4 for NIOV - oxygen and NMean differences between NIOV - oxygen, NIOV - Room Air, Nasal Cannula Oxygen, and no treatment (control) at isotime. Borg Dyspnea Score ranges in values from 0 to 10. The lower score represent better outcome. 0 = No breathlessness at all, representing better outcome 10 = Maximum breathlessness, representing worse outcome

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study Group
Crossover design. Subject were randomized to complete all 4 study arms: 1) NIOV - Oxygen, 2) NIOV - Room Air, 3) Oxygen Nasal Cannula, 4) No treatment
15
Total15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study Group
Age, Continuous65.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 150 / 150 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 150 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Exercise Duration for Constant Work Rate Exercise Tests Under 4 Test Conditions

Mean differences between NIOV - oxygen, NIOV - Room Air, Nasal Cannula Oxygen, and no treatment (control).

Time frame: Study days 1,2,3, and 4; Day 1 for no treatment; day 2 for no treatment and NIOV - Room Air and NIOV - oxygen; Day 3 for no treatment and NIOV - Room Air and NIOV - oxygen; Day 4 for NIOV - oxygen and Nasal Cannula Oxygen.

Population: Per protocol analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NIOV - Room AirExercise Duration for Constant Work Rate Exercise Tests Under 4 Test Conditions6.3 minutesStandard Deviation 4.1
NIOV - OxygenExercise Duration for Constant Work Rate Exercise Tests Under 4 Test Conditions17.5 minutesStandard Deviation 5.7
Nasal Cannula OxygenExercise Duration for Constant Work Rate Exercise Tests Under 4 Test Conditions11.4 minutesStandard Deviation 6.8
No TreatmentExercise Duration for Constant Work Rate Exercise Tests Under 4 Test Conditions5.6 minutesStandard Deviation 1.9
Comparison: The primary endpoint was difference in endurance between nasal cannula oxygen and NIOV+O2. Assuming 153 sec clinically important difference, 183 sec SD, and α=0.05, a sample size of 15 yielded 85% power.p-value: <0.05ANOVA
p-value: <0.05ANOVA
p-value: <0.05ANOVA
Secondary

Borg Dyspnea Score During Constant Workrate Exercise at Isotime

Mean differences between NIOV - oxygen, NIOV - Room Air, Nasal Cannula Oxygen, and no treatment (control) at isotime. Borg Dyspnea Score ranges in values from 0 to 10. The lower score represent better outcome. 0 = No breathlessness at all, representing better outcome 10 = Maximum breathlessness, representing worse outcome

Time frame: Outcome was measured in each Study day 1,2,3 and 4. Study days 1,2,3, and 4; Day 1 for no treatment; day 2 for no treatment and NIOV - Room Air and NIOV - oxygen; Day 3 for no treatment and NIOV - Room Air and NIOV - oxygen; Day 4 for NIOV - oxygen and N

Population: Per Protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NIOV - Room AirBorg Dyspnea Score During Constant Workrate Exercise at Isotime3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
NIOV - OxygenBorg Dyspnea Score During Constant Workrate Exercise at Isotime1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Nasal Cannula OxygenBorg Dyspnea Score During Constant Workrate Exercise at Isotime2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
No TreatmentBorg Dyspnea Score During Constant Workrate Exercise at Isotime4.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Comparison: Per protocolp-value: <0.05ANOVA
p-value: <0.05ANOVA
p-value: <0.05ANOVA
Secondary

SpO2 During Constant Workrate Exercise at Isotime

Mean differences between NIOV - oxygen, NIOV - Room Air, Nasal Cannula Oxygen, and no treatment (control).

Time frame: Outcome was measured in each of the Study day 1,2, 3 and 4. Study days 1,2,3, and 4; Day 1 for no treatment; day 2 for no treatment and NIOV - Room Air and NIOV - oxygen; Day 3 for no treatment and NIOV - Room Air and NIOV - oxygen; Day 4 for NIOV - oxyg

Population: Per Protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NIOV - Room AirSpO2 During Constant Workrate Exercise at Isotime87.9 percentage of oxyHb saturationStandard Deviation 3.8
NIOV - OxygenSpO2 During Constant Workrate Exercise at Isotime98.5 percentage of oxyHb saturationStandard Deviation 1
Nasal Cannula OxygenSpO2 During Constant Workrate Exercise at Isotime92.7 percentage of oxyHb saturationStandard Deviation 3.9
No TreatmentSpO2 During Constant Workrate Exercise at Isotime88.2 percentage of oxyHb saturationStandard Deviation 2.2
Comparison: One-way, repeated-measures ANOVA and Newman-Keuls multiple comparisons testp-value: <0.05ANOVA
p-value: <0.05ANOVA
p-value: <0.05ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026