Skip to content

The Role of Vitamin D in Chronic Urticaria and Angioedema Treatment

The Role of Vitamin D in Chronic Urticaria and Angioedema Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01371877
Enrollment
42
Registered
2011-06-13
Start date
2011-11-01
Completion date
2013-09-01
Last updated
2023-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Angioedema, Hives, Swelling, Urticaria

Keywords

urticaria, angioedema, hive, swelling

Brief summary

This clinical study was designed based on our hypothesis that vitamin D plays an important role in chronic urticaria and that high dose supplementation with vitamin D in subjects with chronic urticaria will improve clinical response. This clinical study will investigate our hypothesis in three Specific Aims: 1. Determine whether high dosing vitamin D supplementation (4000 IU/day) reduces medication usage (primary outcome) and urticaria severity score (secondary outcome) in subjects with chronic urticaria as compared to low dosing (600 IU/day). 2. Determine if high dosing of vitamin D (4000 IU/day) is safe and well-tolerated in subjects with chronic urticaria with or without baseline vitamin D deficiency. 3. Investigate whether there is an association with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, vitamin D receptor mRNA expression, and chronic urticaria severity.

Detailed description

The purpose of this pilot, 12 week, clinical research study is to determine if supplementation with Vitamin D will improve the clinical outcome in subjects with chronic urticaria and angioedema (CUA). Vitamin D is a key element in the regulation of immune system responses, and vitamin D could play an important role in the treatment of CUA. Recently, we published that there is an important association with CUA and serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD). Namely, vitamin D levels in subjects with CUA were significantly lower as compared to subjects with an alternative allergic disorder, allergic rhinitis. There is now one other observational report that supplementation with vitamin D (50,000/wk) in subjects CUA resulted in clinical improvement; however, there was only one treatment arm and optimal serum 25OHD required to obtain benefit was not investigated. This current study is a double-blinded, prospective, interventional study that seeks to recruit adult subjects with physician-diagnosed CUA and randomize subjects to either the recommended dietary allowance (Vitamin D 600 IU/day) or the recommended upper limit of intake (Vitamin D 4000 IU/day). Subjects will answer a questionnaire to collect information regarding demographics, previous diagnostic tests, medications, and complete an urticaria severity score (USS). Information from the medical record: weight, height, body mass index (BMI), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (T4), thyroid autoantibodies, urticaria autoimmune testing (CD203c results), anti-nuclear antibody (ANA), urinalysis, and allergy skin prick testing, which are part of the CUA evaluation will be obtained. Subjects will have research blood draws for serum 25OHD level, iPTH, calcium, phosphorus, albumin, urine calcium, and vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene expression. All subjects will receive standard-of-care therapy according to the 2009 Third International Consensus Meeting on Urticaria position guidelines. Follow-up visits for medication usage, urticaria severity score, and serum and urine safety monitoring will be at 6 and 12 weeks. The hypothesis of this study is that high dosing of vitamin D will result in clinical improvement in subjects with CUA. The primary clinical endpoint is medication usage, and the secondary outcomes are urticaria severity score and prednisone rescue use. We will explore if threshold serum 25OHD levels correlate and VDR expression correlate to clinical outcomes, and to determine power analysis to conduct a larger scale study. Finally, the study aims to determine if vitamin D supplementation is safe and well-tolerated in subjects with CUA.

Interventions

Vitamin D 4000 IU per day for 3 months

Vitamin D 600 IU per day

Sponsors

University of Nebraska
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects will be included if they have physician-diagnosed chronic urticaria and/or angioedema (CUA). CUA is defined by having urticarial wheals (hives) and/or angioedema (dermal swelling) on a daily or almost daily for more than 6 weeks. Patients with CUA also having signs of dermatographism and/or delayed-pressure urticaria will be included in the study. Subjects with history of intolerance to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs will be included but warned not to take this drug class (acetaminophen will be allowed instead).

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects will be excluded if: 1. They are not capable of answering the questionnaire. 2. Subjects with a pure physical or allergic urticarias, and/or hereditary and acquired angioedema (C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency). These subjects will be excluded as the etiology of their disease is known. 3. Pregnant or lactating women. All child-bearing women will be asked (verbally and on the questionnaire) if they are pregnant or lactating. If they answer yes, they will be excluded. As there is no risk or harm to the pregnant or lactating woman, a urine pregnancy test will not be used. 4. Subjects with any clinically significant abnormality in biochemistry testing, and/or hypercalcemia (calcium \> 10.3 mg/dl) or renal insufficiency (GFR\< 50 ml/min). 5. Subjects with a history of primary hyperparathyroidism, renal tubular acidosis, sarcoidosis, granulomatous disease, or malignancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Medication Usage12 week interventionThe Unit of Measure is Efficacy. The primary outcome of this study is to determine if vitamin D supplementation reduces the medication usage in subjects with CUA. Thus, for the outcome of reduction in pills, at 12 weeks, subjects whose pill usage decreases by 2 or more pills per day will be classified as improved. Subjects whose pill consumption did not change or increased will be classified as unchanged.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Urticaria Severity Score at 3 Months3 month interventionThe Unit of Measure is Efficacy. The Total Urticaria Severity Score (USS) ranges from 0 to 93, higher scores = worse symptoms. This secondary outcome of this study is to determine if high dose vitamin D supplementation improves the urticaria severity score (USS). The change in USS will be compared between the groups using the independent sample t-test (assuming the distribution is normal). Logistic regression and multiple linear regression will be used to adjust for possible confounders.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events3 month study trialUnit of Measure is Safety and Tolerability. The number of participants with adverse events will be compared between the groups using the independent sample t-test (assuming the distribution is normal).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
High Dose Vitamin D
Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to high dose vitamin D defined as 4000 IU per day for 3 months. Vitamin D: Vitamin D 4000 IU per day for 3 months
21
Low Dose Vitamin D
Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to low dose vitamin D as defined as 600 IU per day for 3 months. Vitamin D: Vitamin D 600 IU per day
21
Total42

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Study3 for unknown reasons and 1 pregnant04

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHigh Dose Vitamin DLow Dose Vitamin DTotal
Age, Continuous43.9 years43.1 years43.5 years
Baseline vitamin D level28.86 ng/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
37.2 ng/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
33.0 ng/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants19 Participants39 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants21 participants42 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants15 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 210 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 210 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Medication Usage

The Unit of Measure is Efficacy. The primary outcome of this study is to determine if vitamin D supplementation reduces the medication usage in subjects with CUA. Thus, for the outcome of reduction in pills, at 12 weeks, subjects whose pill usage decreases by 2 or more pills per day will be classified as improved. Subjects whose pill consumption did not change or increased will be classified as unchanged.

Time frame: 12 week intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Dose Vitamin DMedication UsageBaseline medication usage2.8 number of pills/dayStandard Deviation 2.6
High Dose Vitamin DMedication Usage3 month medication usage2.0 number of pills/dayStandard Deviation 2.9
Low Dose Vitamin DMedication UsageBaseline medication usage4.6 number of pills/dayStandard Deviation 3.2
Low Dose Vitamin DMedication Usage3 month medication usage4.9 number of pills/dayStandard Deviation 2.8
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Unit of Measure is Safety and Tolerability. The number of participants with adverse events will be compared between the groups using the independent sample t-test (assuming the distribution is normal).

Time frame: 3 month study trial

Population: No significant adverse events. All subjects in the high vitamin D3 group completed the study; 4 subjects in the low vitamin D3 600 IU/day withdrew from the study (1 for pregnancy and 3 unknown). There was no evidence of hypercalcemia.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High Dose Vitamin DNumber of Participants With Adverse Events0 participants
Low Dose Vitamin DNumber of Participants With Adverse Events0 participants
Secondary

Total Urticaria Severity Score at 3 Months

The Unit of Measure is Efficacy. The Total Urticaria Severity Score (USS) ranges from 0 to 93, higher scores = worse symptoms. This secondary outcome of this study is to determine if high dose vitamin D supplementation improves the urticaria severity score (USS). The change in USS will be compared between the groups using the independent sample t-test (assuming the distribution is normal). Logistic regression and multiple linear regression will be used to adjust for possible confounders.

Time frame: 3 month intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Dose Vitamin DTotal Urticaria Severity Score at 3 MonthsBaseline Total Urticaria Score41.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.36
High Dose Vitamin DTotal Urticaria Severity Score at 3 Months1 week Total Urticaria Score25.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.34
High Dose Vitamin DTotal Urticaria Severity Score at 3 Months3 month Total Urticaria Score15.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.9
Low Dose Vitamin DTotal Urticaria Severity Score at 3 MonthsBaseline Total Urticaria Score40.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.4
Low Dose Vitamin DTotal Urticaria Severity Score at 3 Months1 week Total Urticaria Score29.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.93
Low Dose Vitamin DTotal Urticaria Severity Score at 3 Months3 month Total Urticaria Score24.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026