Skip to content

A 6-Month Extension Study To The B2061032 Study To Evaluate The Safety, Tolerability, And Efficacy Of DVS SR In The Treatment Of Child And Adolescent Outpatients With MDD

A 6-month, Open-label, Multi-center, Flexible Dose Extension Study To The B2061032 Study To Evaluate The Safety, Tolerability And Efficacy Of Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained Release (Dvs Sr) Tablets In The Treatment Of Children And Adolescent Outpatients With Major Depressive Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01371708
Enrollment
283
Registered
2011-06-13
Start date
2012-02-02
Completion date
2016-04-22
Last updated
2017-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

Major Depressive Disorder, MDD, Depression

Brief summary

This is a 6-month, open-label, flexible-dose study evaluating Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained-Release (DVS SR) in the Treatment of Child and Adolescent Outpatients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).

Interventions

DRUGDVS SR

Subjects will receive a flexible-dose of 20, 25, 35, or 50 mg/day as prescribed by the investigator

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Completed study B2061032 and who in the investigator's opinion, would benefit from long term treatment with DVS SR * Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, and procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Requires precaution against suicide * Not in generally healthy medical condition * Poor compliance with study drug or study procedures during participation in study B2061032

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030A TEAE was defined as an event that was absent before treatment and emerged or worsened during the treatment period.
Percentage of Participants With a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) (Combination Group)From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030A TEAE was defined as an event that was absent before treatment and emerged or worsened during the treatment period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Score From Baseline to Week 26 on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, Based on Observed CasesFrom Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale is a tool that summarizes all available patient data, including history, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on ability to function. The scale consists of 2 measures: the CGI-S, which rates the severity of illness from 1 to 7, and the CGI-Improvement Scale, which assesses improvement in illness since baseline. The CGI-S is a 7-point scale a clinician uses to rate a patient's severity of illness. Scores range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating normal, not at all ill and 7, among the most extremely ill patients. Higher score on the CGI-S indicates greater severity of illness. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.
Change in Score From Baseline to Week 26 on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale is a tool that summarizes all available patient data, including history, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on ability to function. The scale consists of 2 measures: the CGI-S, which rates the severity of illness from 1 to 7, and the CGI-Improvement Scale, which assesses improvement in illness since baseline. The CGI-S is a 7-point scale a clinician uses to rate a patient's severity of illness. Scores range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating normal, not at all ill and 7, among the most extremely ill patients. Higher score on the CGI-S indicates greater severity of illness. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.
Percentage of Participants With a Response of Very Much Improved or Much Improved on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 26, Based on Observed CasesFrom Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale is a tool that summarizes all available patient data, including history, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on ability to function. The scale consists of 2 measures: the CGI-Severity scale, which rates the severity of illness from 1 to 7, and the CGI-I scale, which assesses improvement in illness since baseline. The CGI-I is a 7-point scale a clinician uses to assess improvement in a patient's illness relative to baseline. Scores range from 1 to 7, with 1 representing very much improved and 7 representing very much worse; a value of 0 meant not assessed. Lower score indicates greater improvement. Response on the CGI-I defined as the CGI-I scores of 1 or 2. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.
Percentage of Participants With a Response of Very Much Improved or Much Improved on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 26, Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale is a tool that summarizes all available patient data, including history, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on ability to function. The scale consists of 2 measures: the CGI-Severity scale, which rates the severity of illness from 1 to 7, and the CGI-I scale, which assesses improvement in illness since baseline. The CGI-I is a 7-point scale a clinician uses to assess improvement in a patient's illness relative to baseline. Scores range from 1 to 7, with 1 representing very much improved and 7 representing very much worse; a value of 0 meant not assessed. Lower score indicates greater improvement. Response on the CGI-I defined as the CGI-I scores of 1 or 2. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), Based on Observed CasesFrom Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030The CDRS-R consists of 17 items. The total score is the sum of responses to the 17 items and ranges from 17 to 113. Lower total scores indicate lower intensity of symptoms. Remission on the CDRS-R was defined as a CDRS-R score \<=28. It was recommended that the CDRS-R be performed prior to the Clinical Global Impression assessments. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.
Percentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale is a tool that summarizes all available patient data, including history, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on ability to function. The scale consists of 2 measures: the CGI-Severity scale, which rates the severity of illness from 1 to 7, and the CGI-I scale, which assesses improvement in illness since baseline. The CGI-I is a 7-point scale used a clinician uses to assess improvement in a patient's illness relative to baseline. Scores range from 1 to 7, with 1 representing very much improved and 7 representing very much worse; a value of 0 meant not assessed. Lower score indicates greater improvement. Response on the CGI-I defined as the CGI-I scores of 1 or 2. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.
Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 26, Based on Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), <=28 and on Observed CasesFrom Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030Remission on the CDRS-R was defined as a CDRS-R score \<=28. The CDRS-R consists of 17 items. The total score is the sum of responses to the 17 items and ranges from 17 to 113. Lower total s cores indicate lower intensity of symptoms.
Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 26, Based on a Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), <=28 and on Observed Cases (Combination Group)From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030Remission on the CDRS-R was defined as a CDRS-R score \<=28. The CDRS-R consists of 17 items. The total score is the sum of responses to the 17 items and ranges from 17 to 113. Lower total s cores indicate lower intensity of symptoms.
Percentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesFrom Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale is a tool that summarizes all available patient data, including history, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on ability to function. The scale consists of 2 measures: the CGI-Severity scale, which rates the severity of illness from 1 to 7, and the CGI-I scale, which assesses improvement in illness since baseline. The CGI-I is a 7-point scale used a clinician uses to assess improvement in a patient's illness relative to baseline. Scores range from 1 to 7, with 1 representing very much improved and 7 representing very much worse; a value of 0 meant not assessed. Lower score indicates greater improvement. Response on the CGI-I defined as the CGI-I scores of 1 or 2. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030The CDRS-R consists of 17 items. The total score is the sum of responses to the 17 items and ranges from 17 to 113. Lower total scores indicate lower intensity of symptoms. Remission on the CDRS-R was defined as a CDRS-R score \<=28. It was recommended that the CDRS-R be performed prior to the Clinical Global Impression assessments. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.

Countries

Chile, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 304 participants completed study B2061032, 283 of whom were enrolled in the current extension study, B2061030, and 281 received treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo/DVS-SR
Participants received placebo tablets in previous study B2061032 and desvenlafaxine succinate sustained-release (DVS-SR) in flexible dosing ranging from 20 to 50 mg in extension study B2061030.
91
DVS-SR, Low Dose/DVS-SR
Participants received DVS-SR in weight-based dosing (20, 25, or 35 mg) in previous study B2061032, and DVS-SR in flexible dosing ranging from 20 to 50 mg in extension study B2061030.
93
DVS-SR, High Dose/DVS-SR
Participants received DVS-SR in weight-based dosing (25, 35, or 50 mg) in previous study B2061032, and DVS-SR in flexible dosing ranging from 20 to 50 mg in extension study B2061030.
97
Total281

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event5812
Overall StudyInsufficient clinical response320
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up597
Overall StudyMedication error/not related to AE010
Overall StudyNo longer willing to participate7713
Overall StudyOther324
Overall StudyProtocol Violation212
Overall StudyStarted but did not receive treatment101

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlacebo/DVS-SRDVS-SR, Low Dose/DVS-SRDVS-SR, High Dose/DVS-SR
Age, Customized
12 to 17 years
194 Participants63 Participants67 Participants64 Participants
Age, Customized
7 to 11 years
87 Participants28 Participants26 Participants33 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
71 Participants20 Participants23 Participants28 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
21 Participants8 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
187 Participants62 Participants65 Participants60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
155 Participants43 Participants52 Participants60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
126 Participants48 Participants41 Participants37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
60 / 9157 / 9358 / 97175 / 281
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 916 / 933 / 9713 / 281

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

A TEAE was defined as an event that was absent before treatment and emerged or worsened during the treatment period.

Time frame: From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in study B2061030

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants With a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)78.0 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, Low Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants With a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)73.1 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, High Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants With a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)71.1 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) (Combination Group)

A TEAE was defined as an event that was absent before treatment and emerged or worsened during the treatment period.

Time frame: From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in study B2061030

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants With a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) (Combination Group)74.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), Based on Observed Cases

The CDRS-R consists of 17 items. The total score is the sum of responses to the 17 items and ranges from 17 to 113. Lower total scores indicate lower intensity of symptoms. Remission on the CDRS-R was defined as a CDRS-R score \<=28. It was recommended that the CDRS-R be performed prior to the Clinical Global Impression assessments. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.

Time frame: From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030

Population: All participants who had a CDRS-R evaluation at Baseline of study B2061030 (Week 8 of study B2061032), took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 CDRS-R evaluation after the first dose of study drug in B2061030.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/DVS-SRChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), Based on Observed Cases-6.79 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.05
DVS-SR, Low Dose/DVS-SRChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), Based on Observed Cases-10.72 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
DVS-SR, High Dose/DVS-SRChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), Based on Observed Cases-8.57 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.01
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)

The CDRS-R consists of 17 items. The total score is the sum of responses to the 17 items and ranges from 17 to 113. Lower total scores indicate lower intensity of symptoms. Remission on the CDRS-R was defined as a CDRS-R score \<=28. It was recommended that the CDRS-R be performed prior to the Clinical Global Impression assessments. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.

Time frame: From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030

Population: All participants who had a CDRS-R evaluation at Baseline of study B2061030 (Week 8 of study B2061032), took at least 1 dose of study drug, had at least 1 CDRS-R evaluation after the first dose of study drug in B2061030, and were available for evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/DVS-SRChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)-8.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.03
Secondary

Change in Score From Baseline to Week 26 on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, Based on Observed Cases

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale is a tool that summarizes all available patient data, including history, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on ability to function. The scale consists of 2 measures: the CGI-S, which rates the severity of illness from 1 to 7, and the CGI-Improvement Scale, which assesses improvement in illness since baseline. The CGI-S is a 7-point scale a clinician uses to rate a patient's severity of illness. Scores range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating normal, not at all ill and 7, among the most extremely ill patients. Higher score on the CGI-S indicates greater severity of illness. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.

Time frame: From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030

Population: All participants who had a Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) evaluation at Baseline of study B2061030 (Week 8 of study B2061032), took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 CDRS-R evaluation after the first dose of study drug in B2061030.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/DVS-SRChange in Score From Baseline to Week 26 on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, Based on Observed Cases-1.02 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
DVS-SR, Low Dose/DVS-SRChange in Score From Baseline to Week 26 on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, Based on Observed Cases-1.44 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
DVS-SR, High Dose/DVS-SRChange in Score From Baseline to Week 26 on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, Based on Observed Cases-0.70 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
Secondary

Change in Score From Baseline to Week 26 on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale is a tool that summarizes all available patient data, including history, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on ability to function. The scale consists of 2 measures: the CGI-S, which rates the severity of illness from 1 to 7, and the CGI-Improvement Scale, which assesses improvement in illness since baseline. The CGI-S is a 7-point scale a clinician uses to rate a patient's severity of illness. Scores range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating normal, not at all ill and 7, among the most extremely ill patients. Higher score on the CGI-S indicates greater severity of illness. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.

Time frame: From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030

Population: All participants who had a Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) evaluation at Baseline of study B2061030 (Week 8 of study B2061032), took at least 1 dose of study drug, had at least 1 CDRS-R evaluation after the first dose of study drug in B2061030, and were available for evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/DVS-SRChange in Score From Baseline to Week 26 on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)-1.05 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed Cases

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale is a tool that summarizes all available patient data, including history, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on ability to function. The scale consists of 2 measures: the CGI-Severity scale, which rates the severity of illness from 1 to 7, and the CGI-I scale, which assesses improvement in illness since baseline. The CGI-I is a 7-point scale used a clinician uses to assess improvement in a patient's illness relative to baseline. Scores range from 1 to 7, with 1 representing very much improved and 7 representing very much worse; a value of 0 meant not assessed. Lower score indicates greater improvement. Response on the CGI-I defined as the CGI-I scores of 1 or 2. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.

Time frame: From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030

Population: All participants who had a Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) evaluation at Baseline of study B2061030 (Week 8 of study B2061032), took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 CDRS-R evaluation after the first dose of study drug in B2061030.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Much improved33.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Minimally worse1.6 Percentage of participants
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: No change1.6 Percentage of participants
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Very much improved54.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Very much worse0.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Much worse0.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Minimally improved9.5 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, Low Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: No change0.0 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, Low Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Very much improved73.7 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, Low Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Much improved21.1 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, Low Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Minimally improved5.3 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, Low Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Minimally worse0.0 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, Low Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Much worse0.0 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, Low Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Very much worse0.0 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, High Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Minimally worse0.0 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, High Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Much improved35.7 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, High Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Very much worse0.0 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, High Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Much worse0.0 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, High Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: No change0.0 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, High Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Minimally improved10.7 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, High Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed CasesWeek 26: Very much improved53.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale is a tool that summarizes all available patient data, including history, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on ability to function. The scale consists of 2 measures: the CGI-Severity scale, which rates the severity of illness from 1 to 7, and the CGI-I scale, which assesses improvement in illness since baseline. The CGI-I is a 7-point scale used a clinician uses to assess improvement in a patient's illness relative to baseline. Scores range from 1 to 7, with 1 representing very much improved and 7 representing very much worse; a value of 0 meant not assessed. Lower score indicates greater improvement. Response on the CGI-I defined as the CGI-I scores of 1 or 2. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.

Time frame: From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030

Population: All participants who had a Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) evaluation at Baseline of study B2061030 (Week 8 of study B2061032), took at least 1 dose of study drug, had at least 1 CDRS-R evaluation after the first dose of study drug in B2061030, and were available for evaluation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)Week 26: Very much improved60.2 Percentage of participants
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)Week 26: Much improved30.1 Percentage of participants
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)Week 26: Minimally improved8.5 Percentage of participants
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)Week 26: No change0.6 Percentage of participants
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)Week 26: Minimally worse0.6 Percentage of participants
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)Week 26: Much worse0.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants by Score on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale, Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)Week 26: Very much worse0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Response of Very Much Improved or Much Improved on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 26, Based on Observed Cases

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale is a tool that summarizes all available patient data, including history, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on ability to function. The scale consists of 2 measures: the CGI-Severity scale, which rates the severity of illness from 1 to 7, and the CGI-I scale, which assesses improvement in illness since baseline. The CGI-I is a 7-point scale a clinician uses to assess improvement in a patient's illness relative to baseline. Scores range from 1 to 7, with 1 representing very much improved and 7 representing very much worse; a value of 0 meant not assessed. Lower score indicates greater improvement. Response on the CGI-I defined as the CGI-I scores of 1 or 2. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.

Time frame: From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030

Population: All participants who had a Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) evaluation at Baseline of study B2061030 (Week 8 of study B2061032), took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 CDRS-R evaluation after the first dose of study drug in B2061030.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants With a Response of Very Much Improved or Much Improved on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 26, Based on Observed Cases87.3 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, Low Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants With a Response of Very Much Improved or Much Improved on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 26, Based on Observed Cases94.7 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, High Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants With a Response of Very Much Improved or Much Improved on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 26, Based on Observed Cases89.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Response of Very Much Improved or Much Improved on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 26, Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale is a tool that summarizes all available patient data, including history, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on ability to function. The scale consists of 2 measures: the CGI-Severity scale, which rates the severity of illness from 1 to 7, and the CGI-I scale, which assesses improvement in illness since baseline. The CGI-I is a 7-point scale a clinician uses to assess improvement in a patient's illness relative to baseline. Scores range from 1 to 7, with 1 representing very much improved and 7 representing very much worse; a value of 0 meant not assessed. Lower score indicates greater improvement. Response on the CGI-I defined as the CGI-I scores of 1 or 2. Mean change from baseline=score at Week 26 minus score at baseline of study B2061032.

Time frame: From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030

Population: All participants who had a Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) evaluation at Baseline of study B2061030 (Week 8 of study B2061032), took at least 1 dose of study drug, had at least 1 CDRS-R evaluation after the first dose of study drug in B2061030, and were available for evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants With a Response of Very Much Improved or Much Improved on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 26, Based on Observed Cases (Combination Group)90.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 26, Based on a Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), <=28 and on Observed Cases (Combination Group)

Remission on the CDRS-R was defined as a CDRS-R score \<=28. The CDRS-R consists of 17 items. The total score is the sum of responses to the 17 items and ranges from 17 to 113. Lower total s cores indicate lower intensity of symptoms.

Time frame: From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030

Population: All participants who had a CDRS-R evaluation at Baseline of study B2061030 (Week 8 of study B2061032), took at least 1 dose of study drug, had at least 1 CDRS-R evaluation after the first dose of study drug in B2061030, and were available for evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants With Remission at Week 26, Based on a Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), <=28 and on Observed Cases (Combination Group)79.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 26, Based on Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), <=28 and on Observed Cases

Remission on the CDRS-R was defined as a CDRS-R score \<=28. The CDRS-R consists of 17 items. The total score is the sum of responses to the 17 items and ranges from 17 to 113. Lower total s cores indicate lower intensity of symptoms.

Time frame: From Week 8 (B2061032)/Day 1 (B2061030) to Week 26 of B2061030

Population: All participants who had a CDRS-R evaluation at Baseline of study B2061030 (Week 8 of study B2061032), took at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 CDRS-R evaluation after the first dose of study drug in B2061030.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants With Remission at Week 26, Based on Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), <=28 and on Observed Cases73.0 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, Low Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants With Remission at Week 26, Based on Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), <=28 and on Observed Cases89.5 Percentage of participants
DVS-SR, High Dose/DVS-SRPercentage of Participants With Remission at Week 26, Based on Score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R), <=28 and on Observed Cases75.0 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026