Skip to content

Clinical Comparison of Two Multifocal Contact Lenses Made of Silicone Hydrogel Materials

Clinical Comparison of Two Multifocal Contact Lenses Made of Silicone Hydrogel Materials

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01371539
Enrollment
109
Registered
2011-06-13
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2012-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia, Presbyopia

Keywords

Myopia, Presbyopia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to compare visual performance measures between two multifocal contact lenses on presbyopic wearers.

Interventions

Commercially marketed, silicone hydrogel, multifocal contact lens for daily wear use.

Commercially marketed (France), silicone hydrogel, multifocal contact lens for daily wear use.

Sponsors

CIBA VISION
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least 35 years of age. * Spectacle add of +0.50 to +2.50 diopters (inclusive). * Currently wearing soft contact lenses at least 5 days per week and at least 8 hours per day. * Able to be fit in both eyes with soft multifocal lenses in available powers. * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Eye injury or surgery within 12 weeks of enrollment in trial. * Currently enrolled in any clinical trial. * Astigmatism of 1.00 diopter or more. * Currently wearing excluded brands of multifocal lenses, as specified by protocol. * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Corrected Distance Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Distance Visual Acuity1 weekThe participant read a Snellen chart at a 20-foot equivalent distance with both eyes together while wearing study lenses. The Snellen acuity was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equated to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and was considered normal distance eyesight. A positive logMAR value indicated poorer vision, and a negative value denoted better visual acuity.
Corrected Near Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Near Visual Acuity1 weekThe participant read a Snellen chart at 40 centimeters with both eyes together while wearing study lenses. The Snellen acuity was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equated to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and was considered normal near eyesight. A positive logMAR value indicated poorer vision, and a negative value denoted better visual acuity.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited and enrolled from 12 US private practices.

Pre-assignment details

Five participants were enrolled, but not dispensed, due to failing inclusion/exclusion criteria (4) and unacceptable subjective vision (1). Baseline characteristics are presented on all enrolled and dispensed participants: 104.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall
All enrolled and dispensed participants
104
Total104

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Period One: One WeekLost to Follow-up01
Period Two: One WeekLost to Follow-up01
Period Two: One WeekTime/job conflict01
Period Two: One WeekUnacceptable Objective Visual Acuity01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall
Age Continuous49.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
Region of Enrollment
United States
104 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1030 / 104
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1030 / 104

Outcome results

Primary

Corrected Distance Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Distance Visual Acuity

The participant read a Snellen chart at a 20-foot equivalent distance with both eyes together while wearing study lenses. The Snellen acuity was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equated to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and was considered normal distance eyesight. A positive logMAR value indicated poorer vision, and a negative value denoted better visual acuity.

Time frame: 1 week

Population: The Efficacy Evaluable Set (EES) contained all enrolled and dispensed subjects with no major protocol deviations as determined by masked review that also completed a minimum of 4 days of lens wear with either study product and attended an assessing follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BCorrected Distance Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Distance Visual Acuity-0.00 logMARStandard Deviation 0.07
Comfilcon ACorrected Distance Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Distance Visual Acuity0.00 logMARStandard Deviation 0.06
Primary

Corrected Near Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Near Visual Acuity

The participant read a Snellen chart at 40 centimeters with both eyes together while wearing study lenses. The Snellen acuity was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equated to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and was considered normal near eyesight. A positive logMAR value indicated poorer vision, and a negative value denoted better visual acuity.

Time frame: 1 week

Population: The Efficacy Evaluable Set (EES) contained all enrolled and dispensed subjects with no major protocol deviations as determined by masked review that also completed a minimum of 4 days of lens wear with either study product and attended an assessing follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BCorrected Near Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Near Visual Acuity0.12 logMARStandard Deviation 0.1
Comfilcon ACorrected Near Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Near Visual Acuity0.10 logMARStandard Deviation 0.12

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026