Skip to content

Progressive Resistance Strength Training (PRT) in Hospitalised Elderly Patients

The Effect of Progressive Resistance Strength Training in Hospitalised Elderly Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01371097
Acronym
B15
Enrollment
71
Registered
2011-06-10
Start date
2006-09-30
Completion date
2008-01-31
Last updated
2015-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronical Obstructive Lung Diseases, Medical Diseases, Neurological Diseases

Keywords

Barthel Index, elderly hospitalised patients, progressive resistance training

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of progressive resistance strength training (PRT) in elderly hospitalised patients. The hypothesis is that PRT given as an additional training would improve the rehabilitation and increase the level of activity of daily living.

Detailed description

Elderly inpatients included in the study were randomised into a control group or a training group. All included patients received the regular in-physiotherapy, but the training group received progressive resistance training in groups in addition.

Interventions

OTHERProgressive Resistance strength training

Resistance strength training is given as circle training. The resistance is increased with regularly intervals.

Sponsors

Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Hospitalised elderly patients referred for physiotherapy. 2. Ability to perform standing position independently with/without walking aids (rollator, crutch) or bed/bench support.

Exclusion criteria

1. Expected length of stay \< 7 days. 2. Dementia. 3. Unable to communicate relevant. 4. Unable to be active

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Timed Up & Go TestBefore randomisation and 3 days before discharge from the departmentThe Timed Up & Go (TUG) test assess basic functional mobility.(14). The test measures the time (in seconds)that the subjects used for standing up from the seating position on a chair (chair seat height = 45 cm) with armrest, walking 3 m, turning around and walking back to the chair and sitting down again.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Barthel Indexbefore randomisation and 3 days before discharge from the departmentBI consists of 10 functional tasks of which 3 tasks focus the function of mowing and walking. Task numbers 8 in BI Transfer assess the ability to move and are rated on a 0, 5 and10 point ordinal scale. Task number 9 in BI Walking assess the ability to walk rated on a 0, 5 or 10 point scale. Task number 10 in BI Stairs assesses the ability to walk on stairs and is rated with 0, 5, 10 or 15 points.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026