Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis, Guillain-Barre Syndrome
Conditions
Keywords
citrate, anticoagulation, plasma exchange, efficacy
Brief summary
The investigators want to compare the efficacy of plasma exchange treatment with using two different citrates ( 4% and 15% ) as anticoagulants in plasma exchange treatment. The efficacy of plasma exchange treatment is better with using 15% trisodium citrate as anticoagulant during the plasma exchange procedure.
Detailed description
To compare the elimination rate of immunoglobulins in plasma exchange treatment by using two differently concentrated citrates for anticoagulation during plasma exchange procedure. At the same time we want to compare acid-base , electrolyte status and anticoagulation protocol in two citrate groups.
Interventions
the therapeutic plasma exchange is the procedure of removing the plasma of the patient including pathological macromolecules and replacing it with the replacement fluid
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* patients who need plasma exchange treatment * human albumins as a replacement fluid
Exclusion criteria
* anemia Hb less than 90
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The efficacy of plasma exchange, measuring immunoglobulins type G before and after the procedure, using 4% and 15% citrate as anticoagulants | the whole trial, approximately 3 years |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Using 15% citrate as an anticoagulant during plasma exchange treatment is as safe as using 4% citrate as anticoagulant during plasma exchange treatment. | the whole trial, approximately 3 years |
| The percentage of patients in whom there is a 50% reduction of immunoglobulins after plasma exchange using 4% and 15% citrate as anticoagulants | the whole trial, approximately 3 years |
Countries
Slovenia