Skip to content

Safety and Effectiveness of a Non-invasive Neuromodulation Device on Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Overactive Bladder

Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of a Transcutaneous, High-frequency, Amplitude-modulated, Non-invasive Neuromodulation Device on Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Subjects With Overactive Bladder (OAB)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01369485
Acronym
Beacon
Enrollment
163
Registered
2011-06-09
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2014-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overactive Bladder

Keywords

Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder, Frequency, Urgency

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the change from baseline between the active and sham treatment groups in the treatment of urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes (leaks).

Interventions

DEVICE(VERV™ System)

Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.

DEVICESham version of (VERV™ System)

Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.

Sponsors

Novella Clinical
CollaboratorOTHER
Data & Inference, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ethicon Endo-Surgery
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and Females, at least 18 years of age * Failure on primary OAB treatment, such as behavior modification or fluid/diet management, AND at least one (1) anti-cholinergic drug (unless patient was contra-indicated for anti-cholinergic use) * Symptoms of overactive bladder for at least 6 months * An average of one (1) or more urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes per 24-hours, over a 3-day period, confirmed by the 3-day baseline voiding diary, with a maximum of 12 urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes per 24-hours * Dexterity and ability to place and operate the device * Females of child-bearing capability agrees to use a reliable form of birth control for the duration of the trial * An average of eight (8) or more voids per 24-hours, over a 3-day period, confirmed by the 3-day baseline voiding diary * Willing and capable of understanding and complying with all requirements of the protocol, including proper completion of the baseline voiding diary * Signed and dated the IRB-approved Informed Consent document.

Exclusion criteria

* Dysfunctional voiding symptoms unrelated to OAB, such as clinically significant bladder outlet obstruction, and urinary retention (pvr \> 100 cc) * Morbidly obese, defined as having Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2 * Stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence * Neurological disease affecting urinary bladder function, including but not limited to Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke, spinal cord injury and uncontrolled epilepsy. * Pelvic surgery (such as sub-urethral sling, pelvic floor repair) within the past 6 months * Intravesical or urethral sphincter Botulinum Toxin Type A injections within the past 12 months * Any neuromodulation therapy for overactive bladder within the past 3 months * Failure to respond to previous neuromodulation therapy for overactive bladder * Leading edge of any vaginal prolapse is beyond hymenel ring. * Prior peri-urethral or transurethral bulking agent injections for bladder problems within the past 12 months. * Any skin conditions affecting treatment or assessment of the treatment sites * History of lower back surgery or injury that could impact placement of the patch, or where underlying scar tissue or nerve damage may impact treatment. * Presence of an implanted electro-medical device (e.g. pacemaker, defibrillator, InterStim®, etc.), or any metallic implant in the lower back. * Pregnant, nursing, suspected to be pregnant (by urine pregnancy method), or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study. * Known latex allergies, or allergies or hypersensitivity to patch materials that will be in contact with the body (e.g., hydrogel, acrylic-based adhesive, polyurethane). * Uncontrolled diabetes and/or diabetes with peripheral neuropathy. * Current Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) or history of recurrent UTIs (\>3 UTIs in the past year). * History of lower tract genitourinary malignancies within the last 6 months or any previous pelvic radiation. * Any clinically significant systemic disease or condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would make the patient unsuitable for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate Proportion of Responders Based on the Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups12 weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label)The primary objective of the randomized phase of the study is to evaluate the 12 week change from baseline in mean urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes (leaks) between the active and sham treatment groups. The mean of the number of urinary incontinence episodes over 24 hours is defined as the mean of the number of UIEs recorded per 24 hour period for three consecutive days (via a 3-day diary). The primary objective of the open label phase of the study is to evaluate and confirm the continued efficacy of the VERV™ System for long-term use. The primary objective was assessed with rate of responders, where responder was defined as a subject who achieved a decrease of ≥50% in mean urgency urinary incontinence episodes at 12 weeks compared to baseline.
Evaluate the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups12 weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label)The primary objective of the randomized phase of the study is to evaluate the 12 week and 12 month median change from baseline in mean urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes (leaks) between treatment groups. The mean of the number of urinary incontinence episodes over 24 hours is defined as the mean of the number of UIEs recorded per 24 hour period for three consecutive days (via a 3-day diary). Mean urinary frequency episodes calculated for each patient during time period. The median change in frequency was then calculated for each treatment group. Distribution of changes from baseline were then assessed prospectively for normality using the Kolmogorov - Smirnoff test. Since departure from normality was actually observed in the distribution, the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was performed to compare the median change between treatment groups and the p-values for the test of equality of medians were reported along with the medians.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measure Decrease in the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency Episodes12 weeksEvaluate the 12 week change from baseline in median for mean number of urgency episodes between the active and sham treatment groups. Patients were required to complete seven 3-day voiding diaries throughout the course of the study. The voiding diary collected the following information: amount voided (in ml); urgency associated with each toileted void , approximate time of leak, and presence of urge preceding leak.The mean number of urgency episodes over 24 hours was then calculated for each patient during the observation period. The change in median for the mean of the number of urgency episodes over 24 hours) for each treatment group was then calculated. Distribution of changes from baseline were assessed prospectively using the Kolmogorov - Smirnoff test. The Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was performed to compare the median change between treatment groups and the p-values for the test of equality of medians were reported along with the medians.
Measure Improvement in the Median of the Mean OAB-Symptom Composite Score12 weeksOAB Symptom Composite Score (OAB-SCS) is a composite symptom score of toilet voids, urgency severity and urge urinary incontinence combining the Indevus Urgency Severity Scale (IUSS) for capture of urgency severity per toilet void with 24-hour frequency and UUI episodes. IUSS Score/void and/or UUI is assigned an OAB-SCS Point/Void: 0(none)=1, 1(mild/easily tolerated)=2, 2(moderate discomfort interfering with activities)=3, 3(severe/extreme urgency discomfort that abruptly stopped all activity or tasks)=4, UUI without void=5. Overall OAB-SCS Score is calculated for each day by multiplying the OAB-SCS Points/Void and/or UUIs by the number of events meeting criteria and adding the individual scores together. The minimum overall OAB-SCS score in a 24 hour period would be a 1 (representing a single mild void with a OAB -SCS Point/Void score of 0). The score would increase based upon the number voids/events and overall severity each event. Medians calculated for each treatment group.
Change in Median Total Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) of OAB-q From Baseline (Screening) to Week 1212 Weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label).The OAB-q is validated to measure symptom bother and life impact due to OAB. It consists of an 8-item Bother Scale to assess individual symptoms and a 25-item HRQL scale that in turn consists of 4 subscales (coping-8 items, concern-7 items, sleep-5 items and social-5 items) to assess impact on life. Responses for each item in the Bother Scale range from 1 (bothered not at all by the symptom) to 6 (Bothered A Very Great Deal). Scores are then added generating an overall Bother Score (severity) ranging from 8 to 48. For HRQL, individual responses range between 1-None of the Time to a 6-All of the Time. Subscale scores range from 8-48 (coping) 7-42 (concern), 5-30 (sleep) and 5-30 (social). Subscale scores are then added to generate the HRQL ranging between 25-150. Raw HRQL scores are transformed for standardization purposes as follows: ((Highest Possible Score-Actual Raw Score)/Range of Scores)\*1 00 so that scores could range from 0 (All of the Time) to 100 (None of the Time).
Measure Change in the Median of the Mean Urinary Frequency12 weeks and 12 MonthsEvaluate the 12 week change from baseline in median urinary frequency between the active and sham treatment groups. Mean urinary frequency episodes calculated for each patient during time period. The median change in frequency was then calculated for each treatment group. Distribution of changes from baseline were then assessed prospectively for normality using the Kolmogorov - Smirnoff test. Since departure from normality was actually observed in the distribution, the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was performed to compare the median change between treatment groups and the p-values for the test of equality of medians were reported along with the medians.
Assessment of Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS)12 WeeksTBS is a patient-reported outcome comprised of a 4-point scale of checkboxes to describe the change in condition during treatment (greatly improved to worsened). Improvement was defined as a change in the patient's assessment of overall condition to improved or greatly improved over the course of treatment. Analysis was based upon the number of patients who reported an improvement in condition.
Assessment of Improvement as Measure by Overactive Bladder Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SAT)12 weeksOverall satisfaction with treatment was assessed (OAB-SAT-q) an 11 question list with multiple scaled checkboxes to allow the subject to rate the treatment with regard to satisfaction, bother from side effects, treatment endorsement, and convenience.
Change Clinical Global Impressions at 12 Weeks12 weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label Phase)CGI is an Investigator assessment, which rates the severity of illness at baseline on a scale of 1 (normal, not ill at all) to 7 (Amongst the most extremely ill patients), and then rates improvement at 12 weeks on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 10 (very much worse). The analysis was based upon the number of patients that much and very much improved.
Change in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) From Baseline (Screening Period) to Week 12 as Defined as an Improvement in Severity.12 Weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label Phase)PPBC is a 6-point scale (from 'no problems at all' to 'many severe problems') describing the problem level of the bladder condition at that moment. Improvement is defined as a reduction in the number and/or severity of observed problems.
Measure Median Change in Mean Volume Per Void12 weeksEvaluate the 12 week median change from baseline in mean volume (ml) per void between the active and sham treatment groups

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

After informed consent was obtained, subjects had a 10-day washout period from any anti-cholinergic medications prescribed for treatment of overactive bladder prior to initiating study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Treatment Group
VERV™ System (VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
80
Sham Treatment Group
Sham version of (VERV™ System) Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
83
Total163

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Open Label Phase (Week 12 to Month 12)1 pacemaker, 1 noncompliance, 1 hospice03
Open Label Phase (Week 12 to Month 12)Adverse Event119
Open Label Phase (Week 12 to Month 12)Death01
Open Label Phase (Week 12 to Month 12)Lost to Follow-up23
Open Label Phase (Week 12 to Month 12)Physician Decision34
Open Label Phase (Week 12 to Month 12)Withdrawal by Subject1720
Randomized Phase (Day 0 to Week 12)Adverse Event75
Randomized Phase (Day 0 to Week 12)expired patches20
Randomized Phase (Day 0 to Week 12)Lost to Follow-up24
Randomized Phase (Day 0 to Week 12)Withdrawal by Subject128

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive Treatment GroupSham Treatment GroupTotal
Age, Continuous60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
11 participants12 participants23 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
65 participants66 participants131 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 participants2 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
80 participants83 participants163 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
70 Participants68 Participants138 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants15 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
30 / 8029 / 8213 / 5712 / 66
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 800 / 820 / 571 / 66

Outcome results

Primary

Evaluate Proportion of Responders Based on the Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups

The primary objective of the randomized phase of the study is to evaluate the 12 week change from baseline in mean urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes (leaks) between the active and sham treatment groups. The mean of the number of urinary incontinence episodes over 24 hours is defined as the mean of the number of UIEs recorded per 24 hour period for three consecutive days (via a 3-day diary). The primary objective of the open label phase of the study is to evaluate and confirm the continued efficacy of the VERV™ System for long-term use. The primary objective was assessed with rate of responders, where responder was defined as a subject who achieved a decrease of ≥50% in mean urgency urinary incontinence episodes at 12 weeks compared to baseline.

Time frame: 12 weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label)

Population: Intent to treat population. Responders are defined as patients who had a greater than or equal to 50% decrease in mean number urgency incontinence episodes over 24 hours.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Active Treatment GroupEvaluate Proportion of Responders Based on the Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups31 Number of responders 3.03
Sham Treatment GroupEvaluate Proportion of Responders Based on the Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups38 Number of responders 2.79
Open Label Active Treatment GroupEvaluate Proportion of Responders Based on the Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups16 Number of responders
Open Label Sham Treatment GroupEvaluate Proportion of Responders Based on the Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups19 Number of responders
Comparison: The sample size calculation was determined using the 2-sided Chi-square test with a significance level of 5% and 80% power based upon the following assumptions: (1) proportion of responders at end of 12 weeks of treatment would be 50% in the active (test) group and 25% in the inactive (control) group; (2) a responder was defined as a subject who experienced decrease of ≥50% in mean urgency urinary incontinence episodes (leaks) between baseline and Week 12 of the study; (3) 20 % dropout rate.p-value: 0.3636Chi-squared
p-value: 0.4849Chi-squared
Primary

Evaluate the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups

The primary objective of the randomized phase of the study is to evaluate the 12 week and 12 month median change from baseline in mean urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes (leaks) between treatment groups. The mean of the number of urinary incontinence episodes over 24 hours is defined as the mean of the number of UIEs recorded per 24 hour period for three consecutive days (via a 3-day diary). Mean urinary frequency episodes calculated for each patient during time period. The median change in frequency was then calculated for each treatment group. Distribution of changes from baseline were then assessed prospectively for normality using the Kolmogorov - Smirnoff test. Since departure from normality was actually observed in the distribution, the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was performed to compare the median change between treatment groups and the p-values for the test of equality of medians were reported along with the medians.

Time frame: 12 weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active Treatment GroupEvaluate the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups-3.7 Episodes/day
Sham Treatment GroupEvaluate the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups-1.7 Episodes/day
Open Label Active Treatment GroupEvaluate the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups-1.2 Episodes/day
Open Label Sham Treatment GroupEvaluate the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups-1.0 Episodes/day
p-value: 0.2191Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.5357Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Assessment of Improvement as Measure by Overactive Bladder Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SAT)

Overall satisfaction with treatment was assessed (OAB-SAT-q) an 11 question list with multiple scaled checkboxes to allow the subject to rate the treatment with regard to satisfaction, bother from side effects, treatment endorsement, and convenience.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Intent to treat population for those who had prior treatment for OAB.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active Treatment GroupAssessment of Improvement as Measure by Overactive Bladder Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SAT)65.3 percentage of patient prefer treatment
Sham Treatment GroupAssessment of Improvement as Measure by Overactive Bladder Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SAT)57.6 percentage of patient prefer treatment
p-value: 0.4151Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Assessment of Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS)

TBS is a patient-reported outcome comprised of a 4-point scale of checkboxes to describe the change in condition during treatment (greatly improved to worsened). Improvement was defined as a change in the patient's assessment of overall condition to improved or greatly improved over the course of treatment. Analysis was based upon the number of patients who reported an improvement in condition.

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Intent to Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active Treatment GroupAssessment of Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS)55.4 percentage patients improved (responded)
Sham Treatment GroupAssessment of Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS)42.4 percentage patients improved (responded)
p-value: 0.2032Fisher Exact
Secondary

Change Clinical Global Impressions at 12 Weeks

CGI is an Investigator assessment, which rates the severity of illness at baseline on a scale of 1 (normal, not ill at all) to 7 (Amongst the most extremely ill patients), and then rates improvement at 12 weeks on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 10 (very much worse). The analysis was based upon the number of patients that much and very much improved.

Time frame: 12 weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label Phase)

Population: Intent to treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active Treatment GroupChange Clinical Global Impressions at 12 Weeks23.2 % patients much or very much improved
Sham Treatment GroupChange Clinical Global Impressions at 12 Weeks24.2 % patients much or very much improved
Open Label Active Treatment GroupChange Clinical Global Impressions at 12 Weeks36.0 % patients much or very much improved
Open Label Sham Treatment GroupChange Clinical Global Impressions at 12 Weeks46.5 % patients much or very much improved
Comparison: Endpoint defined as percentage of patients that much improved or very much improved following treatment.p-value: 0.9814Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.7305Fisher Exact
Secondary

Change in Median Total Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) of OAB-q From Baseline (Screening) to Week 12

The OAB-q is validated to measure symptom bother and life impact due to OAB. It consists of an 8-item Bother Scale to assess individual symptoms and a 25-item HRQL scale that in turn consists of 4 subscales (coping-8 items, concern-7 items, sleep-5 items and social-5 items) to assess impact on life. Responses for each item in the Bother Scale range from 1 (bothered not at all by the symptom) to 6 (Bothered A Very Great Deal). Scores are then added generating an overall Bother Score (severity) ranging from 8 to 48. For HRQL, individual responses range between 1-None of the Time to a 6-All of the Time. Subscale scores range from 8-48 (coping) 7-42 (concern), 5-30 (sleep) and 5-30 (social). Subscale scores are then added to generate the HRQL ranging between 25-150. Raw HRQL scores are transformed for standardization purposes as follows: ((Highest Possible Score-Actual Raw Score)/Range of Scores)\*1 00 so that scores could range from 0 (All of the Time) to 100 (None of the Time).

Time frame: 12 Weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label).

Population: Intent to Treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Active Treatment GroupChange in Median Total Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) of OAB-q From Baseline (Screening) to Week 128.8 units on a scaleInter-Quartile Range 20.28
Sham Treatment GroupChange in Median Total Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) of OAB-q From Baseline (Screening) to Week 129.2 units on a scaleInter-Quartile Range 22.05
Open Label Active Treatment GroupChange in Median Total Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) of OAB-q From Baseline (Screening) to Week 1219.2 units on a scaleInter-Quartile Range 23.88
Open Label Sham Treatment GroupChange in Median Total Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) of OAB-q From Baseline (Screening) to Week 1224.0 units on a scaleInter-Quartile Range 20.3
p-value: 0.9918Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.377Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) From Baseline (Screening Period) to Week 12 as Defined as an Improvement in Severity.

PPBC is a 6-point scale (from 'no problems at all' to 'many severe problems') describing the problem level of the bladder condition at that moment. Improvement is defined as a reduction in the number and/or severity of observed problems.

Time frame: 12 Weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label Phase)

Population: Intent to Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active Treatment GroupChange in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) From Baseline (Screening Period) to Week 12 as Defined as an Improvement in Severity.53.7 percentage of patients that improved
Sham Treatment GroupChange in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) From Baseline (Screening Period) to Week 12 as Defined as an Improvement in Severity.44.2 percentage of patients that improved
Open Label Active Treatment GroupChange in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) From Baseline (Screening Period) to Week 12 as Defined as an Improvement in Severity.60.0 percentage of patients that improved
Open Label Sham Treatment GroupChange in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) From Baseline (Screening Period) to Week 12 as Defined as an Improvement in Severity.64.3 percentage of patients that improved
p-value: 0.4147Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.0877Fisher Exact
Secondary

Measure Change in the Median of the Mean Urinary Frequency

Evaluate the 12 week change from baseline in median urinary frequency between the active and sham treatment groups. Mean urinary frequency episodes calculated for each patient during time period. The median change in frequency was then calculated for each treatment group. Distribution of changes from baseline were then assessed prospectively for normality using the Kolmogorov - Smirnoff test. Since departure from normality was actually observed in the distribution, the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was performed to compare the median change between treatment groups and the p-values for the test of equality of medians were reported along with the medians.

Time frame: 12 weeks and 12 Months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Active Treatment GroupMeasure Change in the Median of the Mean Urinary Frequency-1.0 Episodes/24 hoursInter-Quartile Range 3.07
Sham Treatment GroupMeasure Change in the Median of the Mean Urinary Frequency-1.3 Episodes/24 hoursInter-Quartile Range 2.91
Open Label Active Treatment GroupMeasure Change in the Median of the Mean Urinary Frequency-1.0 Episodes/24 hours
Open Label Sham Treatment GroupMeasure Change in the Median of the Mean Urinary Frequency-2.8 Episodes/24 hours
p-value: 0.2893Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.3223Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Measure Decrease in the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency Episodes

Evaluate the 12 week change from baseline in median for mean number of urgency episodes between the active and sham treatment groups. Patients were required to complete seven 3-day voiding diaries throughout the course of the study. The voiding diary collected the following information: amount voided (in ml); urgency associated with each toileted void , approximate time of leak, and presence of urge preceding leak.The mean number of urgency episodes over 24 hours was then calculated for each patient during the observation period. The change in median for the mean of the number of urgency episodes over 24 hours) for each treatment group was then calculated. Distribution of changes from baseline were assessed prospectively using the Kolmogorov - Smirnoff test. The Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was performed to compare the median change between treatment groups and the p-values for the test of equality of medians were reported along with the medians.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Active Treatment GroupMeasure Decrease in the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency Episodes-1.7 Difference in episodes/24 HoursInter-Quartile Range 3.08
Sham Treatment GroupMeasure Decrease in the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency Episodes-1.7 Difference in episodes/24 HoursInter-Quartile Range 3.32
p-value: 0.6557Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Measure Improvement in the Median of the Mean OAB-Symptom Composite Score

OAB Symptom Composite Score (OAB-SCS) is a composite symptom score of toilet voids, urgency severity and urge urinary incontinence combining the Indevus Urgency Severity Scale (IUSS) for capture of urgency severity per toilet void with 24-hour frequency and UUI episodes. IUSS Score/void and/or UUI is assigned an OAB-SCS Point/Void: 0(none)=1, 1(mild/easily tolerated)=2, 2(moderate discomfort interfering with activities)=3, 3(severe/extreme urgency discomfort that abruptly stopped all activity or tasks)=4, UUI without void=5. Overall OAB-SCS Score is calculated for each day by multiplying the OAB-SCS Points/Void and/or UUIs by the number of events meeting criteria and adding the individual scores together. The minimum overall OAB-SCS score in a 24 hour period would be a 1 (representing a single mild void with a OAB -SCS Point/Void score of 0). The score would increase based upon the number voids/events and overall severity each event. Medians calculated for each treatment group.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Active Treatment GroupMeasure Improvement in the Median of the Mean OAB-Symptom Composite Score-5.8 units on a scaleInter-Quartile Range 16.46
Sham Treatment GroupMeasure Improvement in the Median of the Mean OAB-Symptom Composite Score-8.0 units on a scaleInter-Quartile Range 15.67
p-value: 0.4354Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Measure Median Change in Mean Volume Per Void

Evaluate the 12 week median change from baseline in mean volume (ml) per void between the active and sham treatment groups

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Active Treatment GroupMeasure Median Change in Mean Volume Per Void1.0 mlInter-Quartile Range 50.2
Sham Treatment GroupMeasure Median Change in Mean Volume Per Void8.8 mlInter-Quartile Range 51.43
p-value: 0.3387Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026