Skip to content

Lexapro for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Depression & Other Psychiatric Conditions

Escitalopram (Lexapro) for the Treatment of TBI Depression and Other Comorbid Psychiatric Conditions

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01368432
Enrollment
16
Registered
2011-06-08
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2016-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depression, Other Psychiatric Disorders, TBI

Keywords

TBI, Depression, Mood, Behavior

Brief summary

This research is being done to see if a drug called escitalopram (Lexapro) is helpful to people who are suffering from depression after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Detailed description

Despite it's high prevalence, little is known about the pharmacological treatment of depression following Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). This is because of a lack of randomized controlled studies in the treatment of post-TBI depression. This study is designed to examine the safety and effectiveness of escitalopram in the treatment of post-TBI depression. It will also investigate metabolic changes and neural pathways associated with post-TBI depression and metabolic alterations after treatment through neuroimaging.

Interventions

DRUGEscitalopram

Escitalopram 10 mg or 20 mg daily for 12 weeks by mouth

DRUGPlacebo

Sugar pill placebo

Sponsors

Forest Laboratories
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Closed head injury * Fulfill Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Diploma in Social Medicine (DSM) IV criteria Major Depressive Disorder * 18 years of age or older * Able to provide informed consent * Stable medical history

Exclusion criteria

* History of Stroke, Encephalitis, Seizures, or any other pre-TBI neurological diseases * History of mental retardation * Alcohol or Substance dependence in the last 1 year * Inability to undergo MRI scan * Pregnancy * Current use of any psychotropic medications including any antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, or sedative hypnotics * Poor response to escitalopram in the past * Acutely suicidal or requiring inpatient psychiatric hospitalization, as determined by the study psychiatrist * Good medication response to another antidepressant in the past

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at BaselineMADRS score at baselineThis scale assesses the range of symptoms most frequently observed in patients with major depression. This measure will be used to assess the difference in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at baseline and 12 weeks. The scores range from 0-60. 0 to 6 - normal; 7 to 19 - mild depression; 20 to 34 - moderate depression; \>34 - severe depression. In this study the score was used as a continuous variable.
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)MADRS score at 12 weeksThis scale assesses the range of symptoms most frequently observed in patients with major depression. This measure will be used to assess the difference in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at baseline and 12 weeks. The scores range from 0-60. 0 to 6 - normal; 7 to 19 - mild depression; 20 to 34 - moderate depression; \>34 - severe depression. In this study the score was used as a continuous variable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Anxiety Scale (CAS)BaselineThis outcome measure is assessing the participant's anxiety as assessed by the CAS. The scores range from 0( normal; no anxiety) to 21 ( severe anxiety). It is used as a continuous variable.
Satisfaction With Life (SWL)baselineThis outcome measure asses the participants overall satisfaction with life as measured by the SWL scale. The scores range from 5 ( absolutely no satisfaction ) to 35 ( very satisfied with life). It is used as continuous variable.
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Severity at BaselineBaselineThis outcome measure is assessing the participant's overall psychiatric health based upon the CGI score as assessed by the investigator. Scores range from 1-7 1. = Normal-not at all ill 2. = Borderline mentally ill 3. = Mildly ill 4. = Moderately ill 5. = Markedly ill 6. = Severely ill 7. = Among the most extremely ill patients.
Disability Rating Scale (DRS)At baselineThis scale is a measure of impairment, disability and handicap. It is intended to measure accurately general functional changes over the course of recovery and has found to be both valid and reliable. Scores range from 0 (normal) and 29 (extreme vegetative state).
Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)At baselineThis outcome measure assess the participants Cognitive status. Scores range from 0 ( significantly impaired) -30 ( normal). A score of 23 or lower is indicative of cognitive impairment. In this study the score was used as a continuous variable.
Quality of Life (QWL)At baselineThis outcome measure is assessing the participants impression of their quality of life as measured by the QWL scale. Scores range from 16 ( terrible quality of life ) to 112 (Very delighted). Used as a continuous variable.
Clinical Global Impression (CGI)- Improvementat 12 weeksThis outcome measure is assessing the participant's overall psychiatric health based upon the CGI score as assessed by the investigator. The scores range from 1-7 1. = Very much improved 2. = Much improved 3. = Minimally improved 4. = No change 5. = Minimally worse 6. = Much worse 7. = Very much worse

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from the Brain injury clinic at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, other Johns Hopkins outpatient clinics, and via advertisements in local papers.

Pre-assignment details

One admitted to active alcohol abuse before initiating medications , and therefore no longer met inclusion criteria. Another consented but failed to return for any follow-up visits.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
The placebo group received a pill which appeared similar to the 10 and 20 mg of escitalopram.
6
Escitalopram
Escitalopram was started at 10 mg per day and increased to 20 mg if deemed clinically necessary, at week 4. No medication changes were made after week 8.
8
Total14

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboEscitalopramTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants8 participants14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 60 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

This scale assesses the range of symptoms most frequently observed in patients with major depression. This measure will be used to assess the difference in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at baseline and 12 weeks. The scores range from 0-60. 0 to 6 - normal; 7 to 19 - mild depression; 20 to 34 - moderate depression; \>34 - severe depression. In this study the score was used as a continuous variable.

Time frame: MADRS score at 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Group BaselineMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)11.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Treatment Group BaselineMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Primary

Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Baseline

This scale assesses the range of symptoms most frequently observed in patients with major depression. This measure will be used to assess the difference in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at baseline and 12 weeks. The scores range from 0-60. 0 to 6 - normal; 7 to 19 - mild depression; 20 to 34 - moderate depression; \>34 - severe depression. In this study the score was used as a continuous variable.

Time frame: MADRS score at baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Group BaselineMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Baseline29.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
Treatment Group BaselineMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Baseline33.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Secondary

Clinical Anxiety Scale (CAS)

This outcome measure is assessing the participant's anxiety as assessed by the CAS. The scores range from 0( normal; no anxiety) to 21 ( severe anxiety). It is used as a continuous variable.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Group BaselineClinical Anxiety Scale (CAS)9.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Treatment Group BaselineClinical Anxiety Scale (CAS)14.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Secondary

Clinical Anxiety Scale (CAS)

This outcome measure is assessing the participant's anxiety as assessed by the CAS. The scores range from 0( normal; no anxiety) to 21 ( severe anxiety). It is used as a continuous variable.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Group BaselineClinical Anxiety Scale (CAS)6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Treatment Group BaselineClinical Anxiety Scale (CAS)3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression (CGI)- Improvement

This outcome measure is assessing the participant's overall psychiatric health based upon the CGI score as assessed by the investigator. The scores range from 1-7 1. = Very much improved 2. = Much improved 3. = Minimally improved 4. = No change 5. = Minimally worse 6. = Much worse 7. = Very much worse

Time frame: at 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Group BaselineClinical Global Impression (CGI)- Improvement2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Treatment Group BaselineClinical Global Impression (CGI)- Improvement2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Severity at Baseline

This outcome measure is assessing the participant's overall psychiatric health based upon the CGI score as assessed by the investigator. Scores range from 1-7 1. = Normal-not at all ill 2. = Borderline mentally ill 3. = Mildly ill 4. = Moderately ill 5. = Markedly ill 6. = Severely ill 7. = Among the most extremely ill patients.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Group BaselineClinical Global Impression (CGI) - Severity at Baseline4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Treatment Group BaselineClinical Global Impression (CGI) - Severity at Baseline4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Disability Rating Scale (DRS)

This scale is a measure of impairment, disability and handicap. It is intended to measure accurately general functional changes over the course of recovery and has found to be both valid and reliable. Scores range from 0 (normal) and 29 (extreme vegetative state).

Time frame: At 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Group BaselineDisability Rating Scale (DRS)0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Treatment Group BaselineDisability Rating Scale (DRS)0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Disability Rating Scale (DRS)

This scale is a measure of impairment, disability and handicap. It is intended to measure accurately general functional changes over the course of recovery and has found to be both valid and reliable. Scores range from 0 (normal) and 29 (extreme vegetative state).

Time frame: At baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Group BaselineDisability Rating Scale (DRS)1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Treatment Group BaselineDisability Rating Scale (DRS)1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)

This outcome measure assess the participants Cognitive status. Scores range from 0 ( significantly impaired) -30 ( normal). A score of 23 or lower is indicative of cognitive impairment. In this study the score was used as a continuous variable.

Time frame: At 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Group BaselineMini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)29.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Treatment Group BaselineMini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)29.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)

This outcome measure assess the participants Cognitive status. Scores range from 0 ( significantly impaired) -30 ( normal). A score of 23 or lower is indicative of cognitive impairment. In this study the score was used as a continuous variable.

Time frame: At baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Group BaselineMini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)28.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Treatment Group BaselineMini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)27.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Secondary

Quality of Life (QWL)

This outcome measure is assessing the participants impression of their quality of life as measured by the QWL scale. Scores range from 16 ( terrible quality of life ) to 112 (Very delighted). Used as a continuous variable.

Time frame: At baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Group BaselineQuality of Life (QWL)62.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.3
Treatment Group BaselineQuality of Life (QWL)64.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.6
Secondary

Quality of Life (QWL)

This outcome measure is assessing the participants impression of their quality of life as measured by the QWL scale. Scores range from 16 ( terrible quality of life ) to 112 (Very delighted). Used as a continuous variable.

Time frame: At 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Group BaselineQuality of Life (QWL)75.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.3
Treatment Group BaselineQuality of Life (QWL)78.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
Secondary

Satisfaction With Life (SWL)

This outcome measure asses the participants overall satisfaction with life as measured by the SWL scale. The scores range from 5 ( absolutely no satisfaction ) to 35 ( very satisfied with life). It is used as continuous variable.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Group BaselineSatisfaction With Life (SWL)21.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
Treatment Group BaselineSatisfaction With Life (SWL)22.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Secondary

Satisfaction With Life (SWL)

This outcome measure asses the participants overall satisfaction with life as measured by the SWL scale. The scores range from 5 ( absolutely no satisfaction ) to 35 ( very satisfied with life). It is used as continuous variable.

Time frame: baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Group BaselineSatisfaction With Life (SWL)13.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Treatment Group BaselineSatisfaction With Life (SWL)15.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026