Skip to content

A Randomized Controlled Trial of HIV Testing and Linkage to Care at Community Corrections

A Randomized Controlled Trial and Cohort Study of HIV Testing and Linkage to Care Corrections

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01366495
Enrollment
797
Registered
2011-06-06
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2019-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV

Keywords

Seek, Test, Treat

Brief summary

The investigators propose to conduct both a randomized trial of HIV testing in community corrections, and a randomized trial of linkage to HIV care for people with HIV recruited through community corrections (probation and parole).

Detailed description

The first study is a two-group randomized controlled trial in which 6,000 male and female probationers and parolees in Baltimore City, Maryland and Providence, Rhode Island will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions: 1) On-site rapid testing conducted by research staff co-located for the purposes of this study at the probation/parole office; or 2) Off-site referral for rapid HIV testing at a community health center or HIV testing clinic. Inclusion criteria will be: 1) Adult probationer/parolee; 2) not known to be HIV positive, and 3) resident of greater Baltimore or Providence throughout the study period. Exclusion criteria will be: 1) unable to give informed consent. The second study is a randomized trial, whereby all individuals identified at community corrections with HIV will be offered enrollment in a one-year intervention study to examine the ability to improve linkage into HIV care. Participants will be randomized to receive one of two conditions: 1) Project Bridge for one year, or 2) Treatment as Usual-referral to standard level of care. Moreover, those randomized to TAU will be given an opportunity to crossover to PB if they have failed to engage in treatment during the first three months. The rationale for choosing the two cities of Baltimore, MD and Providence, RI is due to the historically high rates of heroin addiction that is associated with multiple HIV-related risk behaviors in these two cities and a high likelihood of being on probation and/or parole. Furthermore, Maryland ranks 10th and Rhode Island ranks 4th in the nation in the number of probationers per 100,000 adult residents.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALProject Bridge

Project Bridge provides intensive case management for individuals with HIV as they transition back into the community from incarceration. The primary goal of the program is to increase continuity of medical care through social stabilization.

Sponsors

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
Friends Research Institute, Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Probation or Parole; 2. Resident of Baltimore, MD or Providence, RI; 3) Willing to be tested for HIV

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Willing to Undergo Rapid HIV TestingBaselineAim 1: To determine the willingness of the community corrections population to undergo HIV testing (Seek). Aim 1a: To compare a strategy of rapid HIV testing on site in community corrections (probation and parole offices) to referral to an off site community HIV testing location with a randomized control study (Test).
Number of Participants That Entered Community HIV Treatment3-monthsNumber of Participants That Entered Community HIV Treatment (yes versus no) at the 3-month post baseline follow-up period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Retention in Community HIV Treatment18 monthsNumber of Days with Retention in Community HIV Treatment
Proportion of Those Prescribed Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) Who Are Undetectable6,12,18-monthsTo determine if a promising, theory driven, case management based strategy (Project Bridge), will be utilized by individuals with HIV recruited through community corrections.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Project Bridge
Project Bridge provides intensive case management for individuals with HIV as they transition back into the community from incarceration. The primary goal of the program is to increase continuity of medical care through social stabilization. Project Bridge: Project Bridge provides intensive case management for individuals with HIV as they transition back into the community from incarceration. The primary goal of the program is to increase continuity of medical care through social stabilization.
50
Treatment as Usual
Passive referral to HIV community treatment provider
50
On-site Testing
Rapid oral swab HIV testing on-site at a community supervision office.
349
Off-Site Testing
HIV testing at a community treatment clinic.
348
Total797

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicProject BridgeTreatment as UsualTotalOn-site TestingOff-Site Testing
Age, Continuous
HIV Intervention
46.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
45.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
45.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
Age, Continuous
HIV Testing
38.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
38.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
HIV Intervention
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
HIV Intervention
Not Hispanic or Latino
49 Participants48 Participants97 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
HIV Intervention
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
HIV Testing
Hispanic or Latino
95 Participants44 Participants51 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
HIV Testing
Not Hispanic or Latino
602 Participants305 Participants297 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
HIV Testing
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
HIV Intervention
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
HIV Intervention
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
HIV Intervention
Black or African American
47 Participants46 Participants93 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
HIV Intervention
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
HIV Intervention
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
HIV Intervention
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
HIV Intervention
White
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
HIV Testing
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
HIV Testing
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
HIV Testing
Black or African American
377 Participants184 Participants193 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
HIV Testing
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
HIV Testing
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
HIV Testing
Unknown or Not Reported
145 Participants79 Participants66 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
HIV Testing
White
175 Participants86 Participants89 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
HIV Intervention
Female
11 Participants11 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
HIV Intervention
Male
39 Participants39 Participants78 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
HIV Testing
Female
130 Participants65 Participants65 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
HIV Testing
Male
567 Participants284 Participants283 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 500 / 500 / 3490 / 348
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 500 / 500 / 3490 / 348
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 500 / 500 / 3490 / 348

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants That Entered Community HIV Treatment

Number of Participants That Entered Community HIV Treatment (yes versus no) at the 3-month post baseline follow-up period.

Time frame: 3-months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
On-site Rapid HIV TestingNumber of Participants That Entered Community HIV Treatment33 Participants
Off-site Referral for HIV TestingNumber of Participants That Entered Community HIV Treatment35 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Willing to Undergo Rapid HIV Testing

Aim 1: To determine the willingness of the community corrections population to undergo HIV testing (Seek). Aim 1a: To compare a strategy of rapid HIV testing on site in community corrections (probation and parole offices) to referral to an off site community HIV testing location with a randomized control study (Test).

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
On-site Rapid HIV TestingNumber of Participants Willing to Undergo Rapid HIV Testing318 Participants
Off-site Referral for HIV TestingNumber of Participants Willing to Undergo Rapid HIV Testing60 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Those Prescribed Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) Who Are Undetectable

To determine if a promising, theory driven, case management based strategy (Project Bridge), will be utilized by individuals with HIV recruited through community corrections.

Time frame: 6,12,18-months

Population: We were unable to obtain official medical records from treatment clinics.

Secondary

Retention in Community HIV Treatment

Number of Days with Retention in Community HIV Treatment

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
On-site Rapid HIV TestingRetention in Community HIV Treatment377.04 daysStandard Deviation 187.44
Off-site Referral for HIV TestingRetention in Community HIV Treatment318.82 daysStandard Deviation 208.78

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026