Skip to content

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01365143
Enrollment
10
Registered
2011-06-03
Start date
2011-05-31
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2014-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma

Brief summary

To date, no study has prospectively compared open versus robotic radical prostatectomy in a randomized fashion for patients with prostate cancer. For patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer who choose surgical management, the choice of surgical approach is often limited to surgeon preference and experience. This study will prospectively randomize patients with localized prostate cancer who are candidates for surgical management to open versus robotic radical prostatectomy.

Interventions

Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy

Open radical prostatectomy

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Biopsy proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate * Deemed a surgical candidate for a bilateral nerve bundle preservation * Potent * Continent of urine * Surgical candidate for both open and robotic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy * Age \>18

Exclusion criteria

* Previous treatment of prostate cancer (radiation, hormones, etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trifectaat 2 yearsFree from biochemical recurrence, continent, and potent 2 years after radical prostatectomy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Potencyat 3, 12, and 24 monthsSatisfactory erections
Free from biochemical recurrenceat 3, 12, and 24 monthsPSA \<0.2 ng/mL
Acute complicationsWithin 30 days of surgeryAny complication according to Calvien classification
Continenceat 3, 12, and 24 monthsContinent of urine
Estimated blood lossParticipants will be followed for the duration of the operation, an expected average of 3 hours
Operative timeParticipants will be followed for the duration of the operation, an expected average of 3 hours
Length of hospital stayParticipants will be followed for the duration of the hospital stay, an expected average of 1-2 days
Long-term complication>30 daysbladder neck contracture, lymphocele

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026