Skip to content

Phase 2 Chronic Low Back Pain Study

A Phase 2, Randomized Withdrawal Study of the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended Release Compared to Placebo in Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01364922
Enrollment
168
Registered
2011-06-03
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2011-10-31
Last updated
2014-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Low Back Pain

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect and safety of hydrocodone/acetaminophen extended release compared to placebo.

Detailed description

This phase 2, multicenter, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal study compared the analgesic efficacy and safety of hydrocodone/acetaminophen extended release to placebo in subjects with moderate to moderately severe chronic lower back pain (CLBP). Participants met pre-defined criteria at the conclusion of the open-label (OL) Titration Period to proceed to randomization into the double-blind (DB) Maintenance Period of the study. Study drug was given for a total of approximately 5 weeks, which included 2 weeks in OL, 2 weeks in DB, and a 3-day taper. During the OL period, all participants took increasing doses of hydrocodone/acetaminophen extended release until they were taking 2 tablets, twice daily. During the DB period, participants in the hydrocodone/acetaminophen extended release group took 1 hydrocodone/acetaminophen extended release tablet twice daily throughout the 2 weeks, while participants in the placebo group took 1 placebo tablet twice daily.

Interventions

Sponsors

AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adult subjects who have a diagnosis of chronic low back pain of at least 6 month duration

Exclusion criteria

Subjects with a history of surgical or invasive intervention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Double-blind Baseline in Chronic Lower Back Pain (CLBP) Intensity by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Double-blind baseline to Day 29The change from the double-blind randomization baseline (DB baseline: the last assessment before first dose in the double-blind period) to the final assessment in pain intensity, assessed using the CLBP Intensity VAS (0 mm = No Pain and 100 mm = Worst Pain Imaginable). Least squares means and standard errors from an ANCOVA model.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status at Final EvaluationDouble-blind baseline to Day 29The participant's overall impression of their back pain status was obtained by having the participant answer the question Considering all the ways your chronic low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? on a 5-point categorical scale: very good (no symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities).
Participant's Global Assessment of Study Drug at Final EvaluationDouble-blind baseline to Day 29The participant's overall impression of the study drug was obtained by having the participant answer the question How would you rate your overall response to the study medication? on a 5-point categorical scale: excellent; very good; good; fair; poor.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
OL Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended Release (Nonrandomized)
2 hydrocodone/acetaminophen extended release tablets, twice daily, for 2 weeks. These participants enrolled in the study and received at least one dose of study drug during the open-label period; these participants were not randomized and did not progress to the double-blind period.
22
DB Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended Release
1 hydrocodone/acetaminophen extended release tablet, twice daily, for 2 weeks. These participants completed the open-label period (hydrocodone/acetaminophen extended release, 2 tablets twice daily), and were randomized to receive hydrocodone/acetaminophen extended release during the double-blind period.
99
DB Placebo
1 placebo tablet, twice daily, for 2 weeks. These participants completed the open-label period (hydrocodone/acetaminophen extended release, 2 tablets twice daily), and were randomized to receive placebo during the double-blind period.
47
Total168

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Double-Blind (DB) PeriodAdverse Event001
Double-Blind (DB) PeriodLack of Efficacy034
Double-Blind (DB) PeriodOther, Unspecified010
Double-Blind (DB) PeriodSubject Noncompliant010
Open-label (OL) PeriodAdverse Event700
Open-label (OL) PeriodDid Not Meet Randomization Criteria600
Open-label (OL) PeriodLack of Efficacy300
Open-label (OL) PeriodLost to Follow-up100
Open-label (OL) PeriodOther, Unspecified100
Open-label (OL) PeriodWithdrawal by Subject400

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOL Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended Release (Nonrandomized)DB Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended ReleaseDB PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous51.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.82
47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.62
52.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.82
49.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.79
Double-blind Baseline Chronic Lower Back Pain (CLBP) Intensity VASNA scores on a scale26.9 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.78
31.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.17
28.5 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.14
Double-blind Participant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status
Fair
NA participants21 participants14 participantsNA participants
Double-blind Participant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status
Good
NA participants57 participants29 participantsNA participants
Double-blind Participant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status
Poor
NA participants2 participants0 participantsNA participants
Double-blind Participant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status
Very Good
NA participants15 participants3 participantsNA participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants61 Participants30 Participants106 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants38 Participants17 Participants62 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
70 / 1687 / 998 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1680 / 991 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Double-blind Baseline in Chronic Lower Back Pain (CLBP) Intensity by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The change from the double-blind randomization baseline (DB baseline: the last assessment before first dose in the double-blind period) to the final assessment in pain intensity, assessed using the CLBP Intensity VAS (0 mm = No Pain and 100 mm = Worst Pain Imaginable). Least squares means and standard errors from an ANCOVA model.

Time frame: Double-blind baseline to Day 29

Population: The analysis of the primary outcome measure included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the double-blind period (double-blind intent-to-treat) and had at least 1 assessment during the double-blind period.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Double-blind Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended ReleaseChange From Double-blind Baseline in Chronic Lower Back Pain (CLBP) Intensity by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)10.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.86
Double-blind PlaceboChange From Double-blind Baseline in Chronic Lower Back Pain (CLBP) Intensity by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)19.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.77
Secondary

Participant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status at Final Evaluation

The participant's overall impression of their back pain status was obtained by having the participant answer the question Considering all the ways your chronic low back pain affects you, how are you doing today? on a 5-point categorical scale: very good (no symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities).

Time frame: Double-blind baseline to Day 29

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Double-blind Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended ReleaseParticipant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status at Final EvaluationGood47 participants
Double-blind Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended ReleaseParticipant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status at Final EvaluationPoor10 participants
Double-blind Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended ReleaseParticipant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status at Final EvaluationFair25 participants
Double-blind Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended ReleaseParticipant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status at Final EvaluationVery Poor0 participants
Double-blind Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended ReleaseParticipant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status at Final EvaluationVery Good13 participants
Double-blind PlaceboParticipant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status at Final EvaluationVery Poor0 participants
Double-blind PlaceboParticipant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status at Final EvaluationVery Good2 participants
Double-blind PlaceboParticipant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status at Final EvaluationGood16 participants
Double-blind PlaceboParticipant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status at Final EvaluationFair19 participants
Double-blind PlaceboParticipant's Global Assessment of Back Pain Status at Final EvaluationPoor9 participants
Secondary

Participant's Global Assessment of Study Drug at Final Evaluation

The participant's overall impression of the study drug was obtained by having the participant answer the question How would you rate your overall response to the study medication? on a 5-point categorical scale: excellent; very good; good; fair; poor.

Time frame: Double-blind baseline to Day 29

Population: Double-blind intent to treat population; scores for participants with no post-randomization assessment were excluded from this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Double-blind Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended ReleaseParticipant's Global Assessment of Study Drug at Final EvaluationVery Good11 participants
Double-blind Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended ReleaseParticipant's Global Assessment of Study Drug at Final EvaluationFair31 participants
Double-blind Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended ReleaseParticipant's Global Assessment of Study Drug at Final EvaluationGood36 participants
Double-blind Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended ReleaseParticipant's Global Assessment of Study Drug at Final EvaluationPoor13 participants
Double-blind Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended ReleaseParticipant's Global Assessment of Study Drug at Final EvaluationExcellent2 participants
Double-blind PlaceboParticipant's Global Assessment of Study Drug at Final EvaluationPoor5 participants
Double-blind PlaceboParticipant's Global Assessment of Study Drug at Final EvaluationExcellent7 participants
Double-blind PlaceboParticipant's Global Assessment of Study Drug at Final EvaluationVery Good4 participants
Double-blind PlaceboParticipant's Global Assessment of Study Drug at Final EvaluationGood19 participants
Double-blind PlaceboParticipant's Global Assessment of Study Drug at Final EvaluationFair11 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026