Skip to content

Prophylactic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension at the Time of Hysterectomy for Prevention of Vaginal Vault Prolapse

Prophylactic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension at the Time of Hysterectomy for Prevention of Vaginal Vault Prolapse (PULS)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01364025
Enrollment
800
Registered
2011-06-02
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2021-02-21
Last updated
2020-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prolapse of Vaginal Vault After Hysterectomy

Brief summary

Is routine uterosacral ligament suspension an appropriate clinical adjunct at the time of hysterectomy? The answers to these questions will facilitate the treatment of many American women. With the results of this study, the investigators would anticipate a reduction in the number of surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse. In addition, if uterosacral ligament suspension was shown to be ineffective, it would not be used routinely in the setting of hysterectomy and women will be spared the additional procedure and possibility of side effects or complications. The relative risks and benefits of adding a prophylactic uterosacral ligament suspension at the time of hysterectomy in women without symptomatic prolapse symptoms have never been studied prospectively.

Interventions

PROCEDUREuterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy bilateral

Uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy bilateral

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Kaiser Permanente
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Eligibility for primary procedure (hysterectomy either total or supracervical, performed either vaginally or abdominally, via laparoscopic or open approach) * Eligibility for secondary procedure (uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy) * Prolapse in any compartment not extending beyond the hymen as measured by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative system * No subjective complaints of Pelvic Organ Prolapse as determined by answer no to questions #3 of the short form of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory: #3. Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in the vaginal area?

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication for uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy. (Surgeon's judgment that a contraindication to uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy exists). * Anticipated geographic relocation within the 12 months after surgery * Inability to provide informed consent or to complete testing or data collection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the occurrence of objective findings of pelvic organ prolapse beyond hymen after uterosacral ligament suspension of the vaginal apex at the time of hysterectomy vs. hysterectomy alone using Pelvic Floor Quantitative Examinationone year and annual thereafter for 5 years

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026