Skip to content

Study of DE-114 Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Allergic Conjunctivitis

Double-masked, Comparison Study of DE-114 Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Allergic Conjunctivitis - Phase 3, Confirmatory Study -

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01363700
Enrollment
87
Registered
2011-06-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Conjunctivitis

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate safety and efficacy of DE-114 ophthalmic solution compared to its Placebo and Olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution in patients with allergic conjunctivitis.

Interventions

Sponsors

Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Provided signed, written informed consent. * Has a positive result from an allergen-specific IgE antibody test. * If a subject is a female of childbearing potential, she must utilize reliable contraceptive throughout the study, and must have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to enrollment into this study.

Exclusion criteria

* Females who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy, or females of childbearing potential who are not using a reliable method of contraception. * Presence of any abnormality or significant illness that could be expected to interfere with the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Ocular Itching Score Compared to Placebo Period1Visit 5 (3, 5, and 10 minutes post-CAC)A conjunctivitis allergic challenge (CAC) was performed 4 hours after drop instillation. Mean ocular itching score was assessed by the subject at 3, 5, and 10 min post challenge and graded on a 5 points scale of 0-4 where 0=no itching and 4=incapacitating itch. Count unit was defined each eye. The endpoint used the average score of three time points (3, 5, and 10 minutes) after allergen challenge .
Mean Hyperemia Score Compared to Placebo Period1Visit 5 (5, 10, and 20 minutes post-CAC)A conjunctivitis allergic challenge (CAC) was performed 4 hours after drop instillation. Mean palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva hyperemia was assessed by the investigator at 5, 10, and 20 min post challenge and graded on a 4 points scale of 0-3 (0=none and 3= extremely severe). Total hyperemia score is defined as the sum of the palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva scores. Count unit was defined each eye. The endpoint used the average score of three time points (5, 10, and 20 minutes) after allergen challenge .

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Ocular Itching Score Compared to Olopatadine Period2Visit 7 (3, 5, and 10 minutes post-CAC)A conjunctivitis allergic challenge (CAC) was performed 4 hours after drop instillation. Mean ocular itching score was assessed by the subject at 3, 5, and 10 min post challenge on a 5 points scale of 0-4 where 0=no itching and 4=incapacitating itch. The endpoint used the average score of three time points (3, 5, and 10 minutes) after allergen challenge .
Mean Hyperemia Score Compared to Olopatadine Period2Visit 7 (5, 10, and 20 minutes post-CAC)A conjunctivitis allergic challenge (CAC) was performed 4 hours after drop instillation. Mean palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva hyperemia was assessed by the investigator at 5, 10, and 20 min post challenge and graded on a 4 points scale of 0-3 (0=none and 3= extremely severe). Total hyperemia score is defined as the sum of the palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva scores. The endpoint used the average score of three time points (5, 10, and 20 minutes) after allergen challenge .

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

* Period1 comparison with placebo (Epinastine vs Placebo) * Period2 comparison with olopatadine (Epinastine vs Olopatadine)

Pre-assignment details

All participants completed Period 1 were randomized 1:1 to 2 groups in Period 2.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Epinastine / Placebo Period1
Epinastine / Placebo : DE-114 ophthalmic solution in one eye and vehicle of DE-114 ophthalmic solution in the other eye, Both eye received 1 drop at designated visits.
43
Epinastine / Epinastine Period1
Epinastine / Epinastine : DE-114 ophthalmic solution, 1 drop in each eye at designated visits.
22
Placebo / Placebo Period1
Placebo / Placebo : vehicle of DE-114 ophthalmic solution, 1 drop in each eye at designated visits.
22
Total87

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Epinastine vs Placebo Period1Withdrawal by Subject01000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEpinastine / Placebo Period1Epinastine / Epinastine Period1Placebo / Placebo Period1Total
Age, Continuous39.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
39.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
39.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants11 Participants11 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants11 Participants11 Participants48 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 870 / 870 / 430 / 430 / 86
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 870 / 870 / 430 / 430 / 86

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Hyperemia Score Compared to Placebo Period1

A conjunctivitis allergic challenge (CAC) was performed 4 hours after drop instillation. Mean palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva hyperemia was assessed by the investigator at 5, 10, and 20 min post challenge and graded on a 4 points scale of 0-3 (0=none and 3= extremely severe). Total hyperemia score is defined as the sum of the palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva scores. Count unit was defined each eye. The endpoint used the average score of three time points (5, 10, and 20 minutes) after allergen challenge .

Time frame: Visit 5 (5, 10, and 20 minutes post-CAC)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Epinastine (DE-114) Ophthalmic SolutionMean Hyperemia Score Compared to Placebo Period12.7 scoreStandard Error 0.1
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionMean Hyperemia Score Compared to Placebo Period14.1 scoreStandard Error 0.2
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.71, -0.92]t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Mean Ocular Itching Score Compared to Placebo Period1

A conjunctivitis allergic challenge (CAC) was performed 4 hours after drop instillation. Mean ocular itching score was assessed by the subject at 3, 5, and 10 min post challenge and graded on a 5 points scale of 0-4 where 0=no itching and 4=incapacitating itch. Count unit was defined each eye. The endpoint used the average score of three time points (3, 5, and 10 minutes) after allergen challenge .

Time frame: Visit 5 (3, 5, and 10 minutes post-CAC)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Epinastine (DE-114) Ophthalmic SolutionMean Ocular Itching Score Compared to Placebo Period10.4 scoreStandard Error 0.1
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionMean Ocular Itching Score Compared to Placebo Period11.7 scoreStandard Error 0.1
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.52, -1.11]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mean Hyperemia Score Compared to Olopatadine Period2

A conjunctivitis allergic challenge (CAC) was performed 4 hours after drop instillation. Mean palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva hyperemia was assessed by the investigator at 5, 10, and 20 min post challenge and graded on a 4 points scale of 0-3 (0=none and 3= extremely severe). Total hyperemia score is defined as the sum of the palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva scores. The endpoint used the average score of three time points (5, 10, and 20 minutes) after allergen challenge .

Time frame: Visit 7 (5, 10, and 20 minutes post-CAC)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Epinastine (DE-114) Ophthalmic SolutionMean Hyperemia Score Compared to Olopatadine Period22.4 scoreStandard Error 0.2
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionMean Hyperemia Score Compared to Olopatadine Period22.7 scoreStandard Error 0.2
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionMean Hyperemia Score Compared to Olopatadine Period23.7 scoreStandard Error 0.1
95% CI: [-0.81, 0.22]
Secondary

Mean Ocular Itching Score Compared to Olopatadine Period2

A conjunctivitis allergic challenge (CAC) was performed 4 hours after drop instillation. Mean ocular itching score was assessed by the subject at 3, 5, and 10 min post challenge on a 5 points scale of 0-4 where 0=no itching and 4=incapacitating itch. The endpoint used the average score of three time points (3, 5, and 10 minutes) after allergen challenge .

Time frame: Visit 7 (3, 5, and 10 minutes post-CAC)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Epinastine (DE-114) Ophthalmic SolutionMean Ocular Itching Score Compared to Olopatadine Period20.2 scoreStandard Error 0.1
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionMean Ocular Itching Score Compared to Olopatadine Period20.2 scoreStandard Error 0.1
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionMean Ocular Itching Score Compared to Olopatadine Period21.5 scoreStandard Error 0.1
95% CI: [-0.21, 0.08]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026