Skip to content

Effect of Molsidomine on the Endothelial (Internal Layer of Blood Vessels) Dysfunction in Patients With Angina Pectoris

Double-blind Parallel Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Molsidomine on the Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris Undergoing a Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01363661
Acronym
MEDCOR
Enrollment
165
Registered
2011-06-01
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2014-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atherosclerosis, Stable Angina Pectoris

Keywords

angina pectoris, atherosclerosis, endothelial dysfunction

Brief summary

Molsidomine used as an add-on treatment on standard care therapy should be superior to placebo used also as an add-on treatment on standard care therapy on improving the endothelial function (endothelium score measured by reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry \[RH-PAT\]) after 12 months of treatment in patients with stable angina patients and undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. The study will be double-blind, parallel-group, randomised, multicentre, sequential, placebo-controlled study. The device used to determine RH-PAT will be EndoPAT. Duration of the treatment = one year.

Detailed description

A Data Steering Committee (DSC) will blindly assess the recruitment rate, the variability of RH-PAT within and between centres, and the safety on a regular basis. Sequential approach: * In the first phase (Phase A) of the study, 180 patients will be enrolled in order to get at least 50 completers after 12 months of treatment. A statistical evaluation of the primary endpoint will be done by an Independent Biostatistician after approximately 50 patients have completed the study in accordance with the protocol. * The results will be examined by an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC)which will assess the results and advise the sponsor as to: 1. Continue the study if the primary objective has not been achieved but the difference between the two groups is at least 10% (difference considered clinically significant). In this case, the sample size will be recalculated by the Independent Biostatistician taking into account actual difference and variability. The total number of patients to be enrolled in addition in Phase B will be calculated with precision. Depending on IDMC recommendations, the number of investigating centres will be increased or not for Phase B. If the right number of patients has already been enrolled, Phase B will not start. The study will stop when all enrolled patients have completed the one-year treatment period. 2. Terminate the study, if the difference between the two groups is less than 10%. 3. Consider the study as completed if the primary endpoint has been achieved. Treatment allocation: Balanced allocation between molsidomine and placebo (1:1) with a stratification for consumption of statins, for the type of stent (drug-eluting stent or bare-metal) and for consumption of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs). Data collection: Electronic Case Report Form (eCRF). Duration of study: A minimum of 30 months (16 months for inclusion and 14 months for the study) for Phase A. Number of investigational centres: * Up to 10 centres for Phase A * To be determined for Phase B based on Phase A.

Interventions

DRUGCoruno

Molsidomine 16 mg tablet, per os, once a day

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo (16 mg tablet, per os; once-daily)

Sponsors

Therabel Pharma SA/NV
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged at least 18 years. * No treatment with molsidomine and/or long-acting nitrates (oral or patches) for more than 48 hours during the month preceding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and no treatment with these same drugs within 3 days before PCI. * Patients who the investigator believes that they and/or their Legally Acceptable Representative (LAR) can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol. * Written informed consent from the patient or from the LAR. * Patients who underwent PCI for stable angina pectoris one month prior to the start of the study. * Patients presenting endothelial dysfunction at Month 0 (score of the Endo-PAT \<0.40).

Exclusion criteria

* Pre-menopausal women. * Patient with a clinically-active malignancy. * Known major renal insufficiency or known significant hepatic insufficiency. * History of psychological disorder, mental dysfunction, alcohol or drug abuse or any other factor which might interfere with the ability to cooperate in the study. * Participation in another clinical trial which has not yet reached its primary endpoint or with the same primary endpoint during the previous month. * Concurrently participating in another clinical study, at any time during the study period, in which the subject will be exposed to an investigational or a non-investigational product (vaccine, drug or device). * Hypersensitivity to molsidomine or to one of its excipients. * Peri-procedural infarction: creatine kinase-muscle/brain (CK-MB) \>3 times the upper reference limit. * Clinically significant abnormal pre-PCI CK-MB and troponin: any elevation above the upper reference limit. * Intolerance to galactose, deficiency in Lapp lactase or glucose-galactose malabsorption. * Left ventricular insufficiency (New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] class III or IV) with an ejection fraction \<35%. * Acute circulatory insufficiency (e.g. cardiogenic shock). * Hypotension: systolic blood pressure \<100 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure \<70 mmHg. * Atrial fibrillation * Acute myocardial infarction during the preceding month. * Unsuccessful PCI: residual stenosis of at least 50%. * Patient taking phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, such as sildenafil (Viagra®), vardenafil (Levitra®) and tadalafil (Cialis®) * Patient taking nebivolol (Nobiten®) * Patient taking ibuprofen + L-arginine as excipient (Spidifen®) * Patient meeting any contraindication(s) from Coruno®. Please refer to Coruno® (molsidomine 16 mg o.d.)Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change Versus Baseline in the Score of the EndoPAT in the Two Groups After One Year of Treatment (Month 12).12 monthsThe results are expressed mean relative change (%) between month 12 and baseline. A positive result means improvement in the score of the EndoPAT between baseline and month 12. It could be considered as a surrogate of a decrease of the endothelial dysfunction. A negative percentage means the inverse. The are no fixed limits to the scale. The minimum observed was -275% and the maximum observed was +4200%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change Versus Baseline in the Score of the EndoPAT in the Two Groups After Six Months of Treatment (Month 6).Month 6The results are expressed mean relative change (%) between month 6 and baseline. A positive result means improvement in the score of the EndoPAT between baseline and month 6. It could be considered as a surrogate of a decrease of the endothelial dysfunction. A negative percentage means the inverse. The are no fixed limits to the scale. The minimum observed was -200% and the maximum observed was +6100%.
Change Versus Baseline in the Augmentation Index in the Two Groups After Six and Twelve Months of Treatment (Months 6 and 12).Month 6 and Month 12The results are expressed mean relative change (%) between month 6 or month 12, and baseline. A positive result means improvement in the augmentation index between baseline and month 6 or month 12. It could be considered as a surrogate of a decrease of the arterial stiffness. A negative percentage means the inverse. The are no fixed limits to the scale. At month 6,the minimum observed was -139% and the maximum observed was +1600%.At month 12, the minimum observed was -524% and the maximum observed was +1600%.
Change Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).Month 12
Frequency of Serious Cardiovascular Events (SCEs) in the Two Groups After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).Month 12Sum of the events collected during 12 months.
Frequency of AEs and SAEs in the Two Groups After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).Month 12Sum of the events collected during 12 months.

Countries

Belgium

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The drop-out rate post-PCI was high (\>60%) mainly because the Endoscore was frequently above the pre-defined threshold post-PCI, attesting of the absence of endothelial dysfunction. Post-randomization drop-out rate was also high, 25% of patients being lost between randomization and month 12, mainly for non-serious adverse events.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Molsidomine
Coruno (molsidomine 16 mg tablet; per os; once daily) Coruno: Molsidomine 16 mg tablet, per os, once a day
18
Placebo
Placebo (16 mg tablet; once a day) Placebo: Placebo (16 mg tablet, per os; once-daily)
28
Total46

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event92
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up31
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMolsidominePlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous62.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
64.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
63.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
18 participants28 participants46 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants23 Participants39 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 3222 / 32
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 3211 / 32

Outcome results

Primary

Change Versus Baseline in the Score of the EndoPAT in the Two Groups After One Year of Treatment (Month 12).

The results are expressed mean relative change (%) between month 12 and baseline. A positive result means improvement in the score of the EndoPAT between baseline and month 12. It could be considered as a surrogate of a decrease of the endothelial dysfunction. A negative percentage means the inverse. The are no fixed limits to the scale. The minimum observed was -275% and the maximum observed was +4200%.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MolsidomineChange Versus Baseline in the Score of the EndoPAT in the Two Groups After One Year of Treatment (Month 12).330.60 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 1014.98
PlaceboChange Versus Baseline in the Score of the EndoPAT in the Two Groups After One Year of Treatment (Month 12).164.08 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 433.41
Secondary

Change Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Per protocol population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MolsidomineChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).Endothelial microparticles-40 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 75
MolsidomineChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).Platelet microparticles0.5 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 101
MolsidomineChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).Leukocyte microparticles-39 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 83
MolsidomineChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).sICAM-1-6 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 51
MolsidomineChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).IL-813 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 43
MolsidomineChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).hs-CRP-50 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 237
MolsidomineChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).MOX-LDL11 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 80
MolsidomineChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).MPO antigen-1 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 19
MolsidomineChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).MPO activity-43 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 51
MolsidomineChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).MPO activity/antigen ratio-42 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 60
PlaceboChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).MPO antigen-32 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 128
PlaceboChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).Endothelial microparticles-40 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 42
PlaceboChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).hs-CRP-35 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 163
PlaceboChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).Platelet microparticles-23 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 252
PlaceboChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).MPO activity/antigen ratio7 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 68
PlaceboChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).Leukocyte microparticles-37 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 29
PlaceboChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).MOX-LDL41 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 83
PlaceboChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).sICAM-16 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 47
PlaceboChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).MPO activity8 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 149
PlaceboChange Versus Baseline in Some Specific Endothelial Biomarkers After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).IL-8-25 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 149
Secondary

Change Versus Baseline in the Augmentation Index in the Two Groups After Six and Twelve Months of Treatment (Months 6 and 12).

The results are expressed mean relative change (%) between month 6 or month 12, and baseline. A positive result means improvement in the augmentation index between baseline and month 6 or month 12. It could be considered as a surrogate of a decrease of the arterial stiffness. A negative percentage means the inverse. The are no fixed limits to the scale. At month 6,the minimum observed was -139% and the maximum observed was +1600%.At month 12, the minimum observed was -524% and the maximum observed was +1600%.

Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

Population: Per protocol population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MolsidomineChange Versus Baseline in the Augmentation Index in the Two Groups After Six and Twelve Months of Treatment (Months 6 and 12).Month 6218.07 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 437.38
MolsidomineChange Versus Baseline in the Augmentation Index in the Two Groups After Six and Twelve Months of Treatment (Months 6 and 12).Month 1298.57 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 470.39
PlaceboChange Versus Baseline in the Augmentation Index in the Two Groups After Six and Twelve Months of Treatment (Months 6 and 12).Month 696.35 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 323.14
PlaceboChange Versus Baseline in the Augmentation Index in the Two Groups After Six and Twelve Months of Treatment (Months 6 and 12).Month 1295.13 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 290.41
Secondary

Change Versus Baseline in the Score of the EndoPAT in the Two Groups After Six Months of Treatment (Month 6).

The results are expressed mean relative change (%) between month 6 and baseline. A positive result means improvement in the score of the EndoPAT between baseline and month 6. It could be considered as a surrogate of a decrease of the endothelial dysfunction. A negative percentage means the inverse. The are no fixed limits to the scale. The minimum observed was -200% and the maximum observed was +6100%.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: Per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MolsidomineChange Versus Baseline in the Score of the EndoPAT in the Two Groups After Six Months of Treatment (Month 6).361.98 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 1248.52
PlaceboChange Versus Baseline in the Score of the EndoPAT in the Two Groups After Six Months of Treatment (Month 6).326.26 Relative change versus baseline (%)Standard Deviation 1155.9
Secondary

Frequency of AEs and SAEs in the Two Groups After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).

Sum of the events collected during 12 months.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Intention-to-treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MolsidomineFrequency of AEs and SAEs in the Two Groups After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).Non-serious AE57 Number of events
MolsidomineFrequency of AEs and SAEs in the Two Groups After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).SAE7 Number of events
PlaceboFrequency of AEs and SAEs in the Two Groups After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).Non-serious AE79 Number of events
PlaceboFrequency of AEs and SAEs in the Two Groups After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).SAE12 Number of events
Secondary

Frequency of Serious Cardiovascular Events (SCEs) in the Two Groups After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).

Sum of the events collected during 12 months.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Intention-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MolsidomineFrequency of Serious Cardiovascular Events (SCEs) in the Two Groups After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).3 Number of events
PlaceboFrequency of Serious Cardiovascular Events (SCEs) in the Two Groups After Twelve Months of Treatment (Month 12).1 Number of events

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026