Skip to content

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Serial Procalcitonin (PCT) Measurements in Critically Ill Patients

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Serial PCT Measurements in Critically Ill Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01362920
Acronym
PCT
Enrollment
300
Registered
2011-06-01
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2012-11-30
Last updated
2013-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sepsis

Keywords

Sepsis, Septic shock, Procalcitonin, PCT

Brief summary

In 2005, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved procalcitonin in conjunction with other laboratory markers to aid in the risk assessment of critically ill patients with severe infection (sepsis). Although considerable literature exists regarding the usefulness of Procalcitonin (PCT) as a marker of sepsis, there are still potential uses for PCT measurements that are not yet explored and its value among the critically ill patients remains unclear. This study seeks to better understand the usefulness of measuring PCT values in patients admitted to the Medical ICU for a variety of reasons and in particular with severe infection (sepsis).

Detailed description

Procalcitonin (PCT) is a 116 amino acid peptide that has an approximate MW of 14.5 kDa and belongs to the calcitonin (CT) superfamily of peptides. Transcription of the CALC-1 gene for PCT is usually suppressed in the non-neuroendocrine tissue, except in the C cells of the thyroid gland where its expression produces PCT, the precursor of CT in healthy individuals and in the absence of infection. In the presence of microbial infection, circulating levels of calcitonin precursors (CTpr), including PCT, increase up to several thousand-fold.1 In addition to being a marker of microbial infection, PCT also acts as a modulator of the host inflammatory reaction. In an animal model of sepsis, administration of exogenous human PCT worsened outcome, whereas neutralization of endogenous PCT improved survival. There are several inflammatory laboratory markers, like tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP), but they are non- specific for infection and can be caused by conditions like pancreatitis, burns, trauma or acute lung injury. The non-specific nature of clinical and laboratory parameters for microbial infection makes it difficult to evaluate patients with potential infection. In addition to the lack of specificity, traditional laboratory and clinical indicators of sepsis are not temporally concordant with the course of illness. As a result, these tests are not reliable to evaluate the response to therapeutic interventions in real time.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

BioMérieux
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All consecutive patients admitted to the Medical Intensive Care Unit of the Cleveland Clinic with an anticipated MICU stay of ≥ 12hrs

Exclusion criteria

* Age less than 18-years of age and/or an expected MICU stay of less than 12-hrs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Development of organ failureCurrent hospitalization (participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay; an expected average of 7-days)
Development and resolution of shock using a cut-off PCT of >0.5ng/mLICU stay (participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay; an expected average of 7-days)
ICU and Hospital Mortalitycurrent hospitalization or 28-day post ICU admission for ICU survivors

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Development of hospital acquired infections (catheter related blood stream infection, development of multidrug resistant infections, ventilator associated pneumonia)Current hospitalization (participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay; an expected average of 7-days)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026