Skip to content

R U OK? The Acceptability and Feasibility of New Communication Technologies for Follow-up After Medical Abortion

R U OK? The Acceptability and Feasibility of New Communication Technologies for Follow-up After Medical Abortion

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01362387
Enrollment
999
Registered
2011-05-30
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2013-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Legally Induced Abortion, Complete, Without Mention of Complication

Keywords

Medical abortion, abortion follow-up

Brief summary

Purpose: This randomised trial will compare outcomes and acceptability of an alternative medical abortion follow-up protocol using standardised text messaging, on-line questionnaire, or a phone interview and a low sensitivity pregnancy test with the current standard of care which consists of either a clinic visit and ultrasound scan or a telephone call and high sensitivity pregnancy test. Hypothesis: The use of alternative methods to assess outcomes after early medical abortion will achieve a higher rate of follow-up than women undergoing standard follow-up Primary aim: To determine the follow-up rate after early medical abortion with an alternative protocol as compared to a standard follow-up protocol Secondary aims: * To assess complication rates and receipt of further treatment among women in the two study arms * To ascertain women's preferences for mode of communication regarding their post-medical abortion status * To determine provider opinions and preferences for different follow-up modalities

Interventions

OTHERAlternative follow-up protocol

Women (n=1000) will be allocated by chance to one of two groups: alternative follow-up using a standard text message, online or telephone questionnaire and a low sensitivity urine pregnancy test, or standard follow-up which consists of an in person visit with an ultrasound or a telephone call and high sensitivity pregnancy test.

Sponsors

British Pregnancy Advisory Service
CollaboratorOTHER
Gynuity Health Projects
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 16 years of age or older, * eligible for an abortion under the terms of the Abortion Act (1967), * requesting an early medical abortion, * willing and able to comply with the study protocol and visit schedule, * access to either a mobile phone, intranet or telephone and willing to have communication by one of these means to assess post-medical abortion status, * willing to have call back messages left, * willing and able to provide valid informed consent, and * able to communicate in English.

Exclusion criteria

* prior participation in this research study, or * current participation in another research study that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the conduct of this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of women with complete clinical information on post-abortion status14 daysThe primary purpose of this trial is to compare the ability of the two systems to identify the number of women who require additional medical abortion-related care.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026