Skip to content

Healing Effects of HP802-247 Versus Antibiotic Ointment in Mohs Micrographic Surgery Patients

A Phase II Randomized, Open-label Study Investigating the Healing Effects of HP802-247 Versus Antibiotic Ointment in Mohs Micrographic Surgery Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01359735
Enrollment
8
Registered
2011-05-25
Start date
2011-05-31
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2017-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-melanoma Skin Cancer

Keywords

Wound, non-melanoma skin cancer, Mohs micrographic surgery, Head or neck

Brief summary

This study compares HP802-247 versus an antibiotic ointment for healing the wound after Mohs surgery.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALHP802-247

High dose HP 802-247, applied at each visit (Week 1-13) or until healed

BIOLOGICALBacitracin Ointment

One dose of Bacitracin ointment consists of 50 units/1 gram. This will be applied daily for 12 weeks (or until healed).

Sponsors

Healthpoint
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Provide informed consent. * Age ≥ 18 years and of either sex. * Type I, II, or III skin as assessed by the Fitzpatrick Scale. * Willing to comply with protocol instructions, including allowing all study assessments. * Scheduled to have head or neck non-melanoma skin cancers removed by Mohs micrographic surgery with final wound size of 8 mm to 20 mm in diameter or with 8 mm to 20 mm long axis if not circular. * Acceptable state of health and nutrition, in the opinion of the Investigator.

Exclusion criteria

* History of anaphylaxis, serum sickness, or erythema multiforme reaction to aprotinin, bovine serum albumin or bovine serum proteins, penicillin, streptomycin, or amphotericin B. * Therapy with blood-thinning agents including aspirin within 14 days of the Baseline Visit (these may be resumed post-surgery). * Subjects with platelet or coagulation disorders. * Therapy with another investigational agent within thirty (30) days of Screening, or during the study. * Current systemic therapy with cytotoxic drugs. * Current therapy with chronic (\> 10 days) oral corticosteroids. * In the opinion of the Investigator the subject has a current life expectancy of less than 1 year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Primary Efficacy Measure Was the Investigator's Global Assessment of Healing (IGAH).13 weeks- The IGAH was measured at study Weeks 4 and 13The IGAH is a four-point scale based on the following assessment scores: 0 = not effective, 1 = slightly effective, 2 = moderately effective, 3 = very effective. The descriptive statistics for both a continuous variable and a categorical variable were summarized for IGAH by treatment week and treatment endpoint. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test the difference in IGAH score between HP802-247 and bacitracin ointment for each treatment week and treatment endpoint. Since this was a small and exploratory study, the P-value of a 1-sided test was reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Over 12 weeks or until wound closure, which ever occurred first. Following completion of treatment subjects were followed for a further 4 weeksComplete wound closure was assessed at each evaluation visit.
Time in Days to Wound ClosureOver the 12 week treatment periodThe Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate the mean time in days to complete wound closure.
Investigator Reported Signs and SymptomsAt each evaluation visit: Weeks 3 and 12 post-surgery.Investigator reported signs and/or symptoms, based on the following 12 items, each scored as none (=0), mild (=1), moderate (=2), or severe (=3): Erythema, Erosion, Ulceration, Swelling, Scarring, Infection, Crusting, Necrosis, Peeling, Contact Dermatitis, Hyper/Hypopigmentation. Item scores were averaged.
Subject Reported Signs and SymptomsAt each evaluation visit: Weeks 3, and 12 post-surgery.Subjects reported signs or symptoms, based on the following 6 items, each scored as none (=0), mild (=1), moderate (=2), or severe (=3): irritation, itchiness, burning, tenderness, pain, and stinging. Item scores were averaged.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were enrolled at a single US investigational site, between June 22, 2011and November 16, 2011

Pre-assignment details

Subjects who met inclusion criteria returned for visit1 on the day of surgery and entered the study following. Subjects randomly assigned to HP802-247 or Bacitracin for post-surgical treatment, which lasted for up to 12 weeks or wound closure, which ever occurred first. Following completion of treatment subjects were followed for 4 weeks

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HP802-247
allogeneic, growth arrested keratinocytes and fibroblasts: final concentration of 5.0 M cells/mL with a ratio of 1:9 keratinocytes:fibroblasts, applied weekly HP802-247: High dose HP 802-247, applied at each visit (Week 1-13) or until healed
4
Bacitracin Ointment
bacitracin antibiotic ointment Bacitracin Ointment: One dose of Bacitracin ointment consists of 50 units/1 gram. This will be applied daily for 12 weeks (or until healed).
4
Total8

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHP802-247Bacitracin OintmentTotal
Age, Continuous74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
66.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
70.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Age, Customized
50-69 yrs
2 participants2 participants4 participants
Age, Customized
70+ yrs
2 participants2 participants4 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 43 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

The Primary Efficacy Measure Was the Investigator's Global Assessment of Healing (IGAH).

The IGAH is a four-point scale based on the following assessment scores: 0 = not effective, 1 = slightly effective, 2 = moderately effective, 3 = very effective. The descriptive statistics for both a continuous variable and a categorical variable were summarized for IGAH by treatment week and treatment endpoint. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test the difference in IGAH score between HP802-247 and bacitracin ointment for each treatment week and treatment endpoint. Since this was a small and exploratory study, the P-value of a 1-sided test was reported.

Time frame: 13 weeks- The IGAH was measured at study Weeks 4 and 13

Population: The ITT population - all subjects who underwent MMS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HP802-247The Primary Efficacy Measure Was the Investigator's Global Assessment of Healing (IGAH).Week 042.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
HP802-247The Primary Efficacy Measure Was the Investigator's Global Assessment of Healing (IGAH).Week 133.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Bacitracin OintmentThe Primary Efficacy Measure Was the Investigator's Global Assessment of Healing (IGAH).Week 042.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Bacitracin OintmentThe Primary Efficacy Measure Was the Investigator's Global Assessment of Healing (IGAH).Week 133.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
p-value: 0.263Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.5Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Investigator Reported Signs and Symptoms

Investigator reported signs and/or symptoms, based on the following 12 items, each scored as none (=0), mild (=1), moderate (=2), or severe (=3): Erythema, Erosion, Ulceration, Swelling, Scarring, Infection, Crusting, Necrosis, Peeling, Contact Dermatitis, Hyper/Hypopigmentation. Item scores were averaged.

Time frame: At each evaluation visit: Weeks 3 and 12 post-surgery.

Population: The ITT population-all subjects who underwent MMS. Both total score and individual item score of the two signs and symptoms rating scales summarized descriptively at Weeks 4, 7, and 13 as well as at the treatment endpoint and compared using a two-sample t-test. the P-value of a 1-sided test was reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HP802-247Investigator Reported Signs and Symptoms3 Weeks Post Surgery1.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
HP802-247Investigator Reported Signs and Symptoms12 Weeks Post Surgery1.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Bacitracin OintmentInvestigator Reported Signs and Symptoms3 Weeks Post Surgery3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Bacitracin OintmentInvestigator Reported Signs and Symptoms12 Weeks Post Surgery1.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
p-value: 0.1354t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.5t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Subject Reported Signs and Symptoms

Subjects reported signs or symptoms, based on the following 6 items, each scored as none (=0), mild (=1), moderate (=2), or severe (=3): irritation, itchiness, burning, tenderness, pain, and stinging. Item scores were averaged.

Time frame: At each evaluation visit: Weeks 3, and 12 post-surgery.

Population: The ITT population - all subjects who underwent MMS. Both the total score and individual item score of the two signs and symptoms rating scales were summarized descriptively at Weeks 4, 7, and 13 as well as at the treatment endpoint and compared using a two-sample t-test, and the P-value of a 1-sided test was reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HP802-247Subject Reported Signs and SymptomsWeek 3 Post-surgery0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
HP802-247Subject Reported Signs and SymptomsWeek 12 Post-surgery0.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Bacitracin OintmentSubject Reported Signs and SymptomsWeek 3 Post-surgery0.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Bacitracin OintmentSubject Reported Signs and SymptomsWeek 12 Post-surgery0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
p-value: 0.0841t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.178t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

The Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.

Complete wound closure was assessed at each evaluation visit.

Time frame: Over 12 weeks or until wound closure, which ever occurred first. Following completion of treatment subjects were followed for a further 4 weeks

Population: The ITT population - all subjects who underwent MMS. Fisher's exact test was used to examine the difference in proportion of subjects with complete wound closure at each of the corresponding time points between the two treatment groups, and the P-value of a 1-sided test was reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HP802-247The Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Week 010 participants
HP802-247The Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Week 020 participants
HP802-247The Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Week 030 participants
HP802-247The Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Week 043 participants
HP802-247The Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Week 134 participants
HP802-247The Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Week 17/Exit4 participants
Bacitracin OintmentThe Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Week 134 participants
Bacitracin OintmentThe Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Week 010 participants
Bacitracin OintmentThe Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Week 042 participants
Bacitracin OintmentThe Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Week 020 participants
Bacitracin OintmentThe Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Week 17/Exit4 participants
Bacitracin OintmentThe Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.Week 030 participants
p-value: 0.5Fisher Exact
Secondary

Time in Days to Wound Closure

The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate the mean time in days to complete wound closure.

Time frame: Over the 12 week treatment period

Population: The ITT population - all subjects who underwent MMS. The Log-rank test was used to test for an inter-group difference.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HP802-247Time in Days to Wound Closure24.8 DaysStandard Deviation 2.1
Bacitracin OintmentTime in Days to Wound Closure28.0 DaysStandard Deviation 3.5
p-value: 0.0594Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026