Skip to content

Comparison of Primary Long Full Coverage Stenting vs Primary Short Spot Stenting for Long Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01359423
Enrollment
89
Registered
2011-05-24
Start date
2011-09-26
Completion date
2017-08-10
Last updated
2017-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Claudication

Brief summary

Hypothesis: Primary long full coverage stenting is superior to primary short spot stenting in the treatment of long (≥80 mm) femoropopliteal artery lesions. Study design : * Prospective, randomized, multi-center study * A total of 220 subjects with symptomatic peripheral artery disease of lower limbs who meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria will be included. * Patients will be randomized in a two by two factorial manner according to the strategy of stenting (long versus short stenting) and the additional use of cilostazol. Each randomization of the enrolled subjects will be done 1:1. * Patients will be followed clinically for 1 year after the procedure. * Angiographic or CT follow-up will be performed at 1 year.

Interventions

DRUGPercutaneous transluminal angioplasty of femoropopliteal artery lesions with primary long

Patients will be randomized in a two-by-two factorial manner according to the use of IVUS guidance (IVUS guidance vs. no IVUS guidance) for the PCI and the duration of dual anti-platelet therapy (100 mg/day aspirin and 75mg/day clopidogrel for 6 months vs. 12 months) after PCI. Each randomization of the enrolled subjects will be done 1:1.

DRUGshort stenting for the primary outcome and use of cilostazol for 12 months for secondary outcome.

Patients will be randomized in a two-by-two factorial manner according to the use of IVUS guidance (IVUS guidance vs. no IVUS guidance) for the PCI and the duration of dual anti-platelet therapy (100 mg/day aspirin and 75mg/day clopidogrel for 6 months vs. 12 months) after PCI. Each randomization of the enrolled subjects will be done 1:1.

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Clinical criteria: 1. Age 20 years of older 2. Symptomatic peripheral artery disease: * Moderate or severe claudication (Rutherford category 2 or 3) * Critical limb ischemia (Rutherford category 4 or 5) 3. Patients with signed informed consent Anatomical criteria: 1. Target lesion length ≥80 mm by angiographic estimation 2. Stenosis of more than 50 percent or occlusion of the ipsilateral superficial femoral artery 3. At least one patent (less than 50 percent stenosed) tibioperoneal runoff vessel.

Exclusion criteria

Clinical criteria 1. Acute critical limb ischemia 2. Severe critical limb ischemia (Rutherford category 6) 3. Major bleeding history within prior 2 months 4. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel or contrast agents 5. Age \> 85 years 6. Severe hepatic dysfunction (\> 3 times normal reference values) 7. Significant renal dysfunction (Serum creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dl 8. Significant leucopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, or known bleeding diathesis 9. LVEF \< 40% or clinically overt congestive heart failure 10. Pregnant women or women with potential childbearing 11. Life expectancy \<1 year due to comorbidity Angiographic criteria 1. Previous bypass surgery or stenting of the superficial femoral artery 2. Untreated inflow disease of the ipsilateral pelvic arteries (more than 50% stenosis or occlusion)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The rate of binary restenosis12months after the index procedureThe rate of binary restenosis (stenosis of at least 50 percent of the luminal diameter) in the treated segment 12 months after intervention, as determined by computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or catheter angiography according to the stenting strategy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ankle-brachial index, etcat 12 months according to the stenting strategy1. Ankle-brachial index at 12 months according to the stenting strategy 2. Maximal walking distance at 12 months according to the stenting strategy 3. The rate of reintervention including repeat endovascular therapy or bypass surgery involving the target lesion 4. The rate of limb salvage at 12 months according to the stenting strategy 5. The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 12 months according to the stenting strategy

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026