Skip to content

Achieving Normal Glucose In Hospital Settings

An Open-label, Single-centre, Randomised, Two-period Crossover Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 24-hour Closed-loop Glucose Control in Comparison With Conventional Treatment in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes on Non-insulin Glucose-lowering Agents

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01359241
Acronym
Angie01
Enrollment
16
Registered
2011-05-24
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2012-07-31
Last updated
2012-11-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysglycaemia

Keywords

dysglycemia, diabetes, closed loop insulin delivery

Brief summary

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 24 hours of closed-loop glucose control compared with standard diabetes treatment, in patients with type 2 diabetes treated by non-insulin glucose-lowering medications. This group is being studied as it is representative of patients with glucose dysregulation.

Detailed description

Algorithm driven closed-loop enables automated subcutaneous delivery of insulin in response to real-time continuous glucose sensor readings. Our studies to date have assessed the safety and efficacy of closed-loop insulin delivery in patients with type 1 diabetes in a controlled setting. For patients with type 2 diabetes treated by diet or non-insulin glucose-lowering medications alone, an episode of acute illness may result in elevated glucose levels necessitating initiation of insulin replacement therapy to optimise glycaemic control. Insulin may also be required in patients with no prior history of diabetes, presenting with 'stress hyperglycaemia'. Closed-loop systems may be of benefit in such insulin-naive patients in whom the optimal dosing regimen is difficult to establish, and may provide a safer method of insulin delivery with the added benefit of continuous monitoring of glucose levels on general hospital wards, thus minimising the likelihood of hyper- and hypoglycaemic events and their known associated worse outcomes. The study has an open-label, randomised, two-period crossover design. Participants will be randomised to undergo two 24-hour studies in a clinical research facility, during which glucose levels will be controlled by either the computer-based closed-loop algorithm (intervention) or by patients' usual non-insulin glucose-lowering diabetes treatment regimen (control). A continuous glucose sensor will be inserted on arrival for each visit. Participants will consume regular meals (matched on both visits) and carry out daily activities mimicking those occurring in an inpatient setting. Stable glucose isotopes will be administered on the two study occasions to collect data for modeling of glucose turnover around meals and during the overnight period.

Interventions

Insulin delivery via subcutaneous pump, adjusted according to computer-based algorithm advice, based on continuous glucose sensor readings

DRUGUsual diabetes treatment regimen

Usual non-insulin glucose lowering medications

Sponsors

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Cambridge
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 years or older * Type 2 diabetes for at least 1 year as defined by WHO * Treatment with glucose-lowering medication(s) (including Exenatide) for at least 6 mths * HbA1c between 7.0% and 10.0% inclusive (measured within past 3 mths)

Exclusion criteria

* Autoimmune type 1 diabetes * Type 2 diabetes treated with insulin * Type 2 diabetes treated with diet control alone * Known or suspected allergy against insulin * Proliferative retinopathy * Current or planned pregnancy or breast feeding * Any physical or psychological disease or medication(s) likely to interfere with the conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results, as judged by the study clinician

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percent of plasma glucose values within target range 3.9-8.0 mmol/l24 hrs

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percent of plasma and sensor glucose values above 8.0 mmol/l24 hrs
Mean plasma and sensor glucose24 hrs
Mean plasma insulin concentration24 hrs
Total basal insulin insulin delivery24 hrs
Low blood glucose index (LBGI) score24 hrs
High blood glucose index (HBGI) score24 hrs
Percent of plasma and sensor glucose values below 3.9 mmol/l24 hrs
Percent of plasma and sensor glucose values below 3.0 mmol/l24 hrs
Standard deviation of plasma glucose24 hrs
Frequency of hypoglycaemia24 hrs
Percent of sensor glucose values within target range 3.9-8.0 mmol/l24 hrs
Frequency of hyperglycaemia24 hrs
Hyperglycaemic index score24 hrs

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026