Skip to content

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) Against Vaginal Atrophy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01358760
Enrollment
450
Registered
2011-05-24
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2017-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vaginal Atrophy

Keywords

Vulvar/vaginal atrophy, Atrophic Vaginitis, Dehydroepiandrosterone, DHEA, Prasterone, Vaginorm, Menopause, Intrarosa

Brief summary

The purpose of this Phase III trial is to evaluate the efficacy of intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in postmenopausal women with vaginal atrophy.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo vaginal suppository

DRUGDHEA

Vaginal suppository containing 0.25% (3.25 mg) DHEA

Sponsors

EndoCeutics Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Postmenopausal women (non-hysterectomized or hysterectomized) * Women between 40 and 75 years of age * Willing to participate in the study and sign an informed consent * Women who have self-identified symptom(s) of vaginal atrophy * For non-hysterectomized women, willing to have endometrial biopsy at baseline and end of study

Exclusion criteria

* Undiagnosed abnormal genital bleeding * Hypertension equal to or above 140/90 mm Hg * The administration of any investigational drug within 30 days of screening visit * Endometrial hyperplasia, cancer or endometrial histology showing proliferative, secretory or menstrual type characteristics at histologic evaluation of endometrial biopsy performed at screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline and Week 12The percentage of parabasal cells was determined from the vaginal smears collected during the study. A 100-cell count was performed by a central laboratory to classify cells as parabasal (P) (including basal), intermediate (I), and superficial (S) squamous cell types. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline and Week 12The percentage of superficial cells was determined from the vaginal smears collected during the study. A 100-cell count was performed by a central laboratory to classify cells as parabasal (P) (including basal), intermediate (I), and superficial (S) squamous cell types. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHBaseline and Week 12A pH strip fixed on an Ayre spatula (or equivalent) was applied directly to the lateral wall of the vagina. The change in color of the pH indicator strip was compared to the color chart for pH evaluation. The corresponding pH value (with one decimal) was recorded. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal DrynessBaseline and Week 12The severity of vaginal dryness was evaluated by a questionnaire filled out by women. The severity of dryness recorded as none, mild, moderate or severe was analyzed using the score values of 0, 1, 2 or 3, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorBaseline and Week 12To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal color (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessBaseline and Week 12To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal epithelial surface thickness (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of DyspareuniaBaseline and Week 12The severity of dyspareunia was evaluated by a questionnaire filled out by women. The severity of dyspareunia recorded as none, mild, moderate or severe was analyzed using the score values of 0, 1, 2 or 3, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsBaseline and Week 12To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal secretions (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy were analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityBaseline and Week 12To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal epithelial integrity (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 897 subjects were screened at 42 medical/research sites located in the US (32 centers) and Canada (10 centers) and 450 subjects were randomized. The first subject first visit was on 21-JUN-2011 and the last subject last visit was on 12-APR-2012.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo: Placebo vaginal suppository; daily dosing with one suppository for 2 weeks followed by twice weekly dosing for 10 weeks.
150
0.25% DHEA
DHEA (prasterone): Vaginal suppository containing 0.25% (3.25 mg) DHEA; daily dosing with one suppository for 2 weeks followed by twice weekly dosing for 10 weeks.
143
0.50% DHEA
DHEA (prasterone): Vaginal suppository containing 0.50% (6.5 mg) DHEA; daily dosing with one suppository for 2 weeks followed by twice weekly dosing for 10 weeks.
148
Total441

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event343
Overall StudyEntry criteria not met/Non-compliance121216
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up113
Overall StudyPhysician Decision101
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject532

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic0.25% DHEA0.50% DHEAPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous58.41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.02
58.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.16
57.59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.47
58.11 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.22
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
9 Participants13 Participants12 Participants34 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White caucasian
132 Participants131 Participants135 Participants398 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
143 Participants148 Participants150 Participants441 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 15017 / 14323 / 148
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 1501 / 1431 / 148

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear

The percentage of parabasal cells was determined from the vaginal smears collected during the study. A 100-cell count was performed by a central laboratory to classify cells as parabasal (P) (including basal), intermediate (I), and superficial (S) squamous cell types. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline60.66 percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 3.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 121.56 percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 1.98
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 1262.22 percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 3.49
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline56.74 percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 3.69
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 12-17.51 percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 2.74
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 1239.23 percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 3.15
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 12-26.52 percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 2.94
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 1233.02 percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 3.09
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline59.54 percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 3.41
Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear

The percentage of superficial cells was determined from the vaginal smears collected during the study. A 100-cell count was performed by a central laboratory to classify cells as parabasal (P) (including basal), intermediate (I), and superficial (S) squamous cell types. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 121.80 percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline0.97 percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 120.83 percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.26
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 123.43 percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.34
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline1.12 percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.13
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 122.31 percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.32
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline0.93 percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.11
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 122.66 percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.41
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 123.58 percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.41
Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal Dryness

The severity of vaginal dryness was evaluated by a questionnaire filled out by women. The severity of dryness recorded as none, mild, moderate or severe was analyzed using the score values of 0, 1, 2 or 3, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal DrynessWeek 121.27 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal DrynessBaseline2.38 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal DrynessChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.12 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.08
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal DrynessWeek 121.10 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal DrynessBaseline2.37 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.04
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal DrynessChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.28 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.08
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal DrynessBaseline2.35 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.04
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal DrynessChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.22 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.08
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal DrynessWeek 121.13 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.08
Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pH

A pH strip fixed on an Ayre spatula (or equivalent) was applied directly to the lateral wall of the vagina. The change in color of the pH indicator strip was compared to the color chart for pH evaluation. The corresponding pH value (with one decimal) was recorded. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.28 pH unitsStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHWeek 126.06 pH unitsStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHBaseline6.34 pH unitsStandard Error 0.05
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHWeek 125.69 pH unitsStandard Error 0.09
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHBaseline6.27 pH unitsStandard Error 0.06
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.58 pH unitsStandard Error 0.07
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHBaseline6.29 pH unitsStandard Error 0.06
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.62 pH unitsStandard Error 0.07
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHWeek 125.67 pH unitsStandard Error 0.08
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Dyspareunia

The severity of dyspareunia was evaluated by a questionnaire filled out by women. The severity of dyspareunia recorded as none, mild, moderate or severe was analyzed using the score values of 0, 1, 2 or 3, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses on dyspareunia were performed on a subgroup of the Intent to Treat (ITT) population (defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria) who had self-identified moderate to severe dyspareunia at Baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of DyspareuniaWeek 121.78 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of DyspareuniaBaseline2.56 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of DyspareuniaChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.78 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.1
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of DyspareuniaWeek 121.48 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.12
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of DyspareuniaBaseline2.58 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.05
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of DyspareuniaChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.10 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.12
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of DyspareuniaBaseline2.60 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.05
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of DyspareuniaChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.06 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.1
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of DyspareuniaWeek 121.54 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Color

To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal color (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorWeek 122.31 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorBaseline2.66 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.35 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.06
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorWeek 122.16 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorBaseline2.60 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.06
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.45 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorBaseline2.65 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.06
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.53 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorWeek 122.12 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.06
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Integrity

To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal epithelial integrity (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityWeek 121.94 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityBaseline2.32 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.38 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.06
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityWeek 121.74 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityBaseline2.19 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.46 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityBaseline2.19 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.08
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.50 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.08
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityWeek 121.69 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface Thickness

To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal epithelial surface thickness (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessWeek 122.40 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessBaseline2.78 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.38 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.06
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessWeek 122.25 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessBaseline2.66 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.06
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.40 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessBaseline2.72 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.06
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.56 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessWeek 122.16 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.06
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Secretions

To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal secretions (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy were analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsWeek 122.33 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsBaseline2.71 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.38 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.05
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsWeek 122.07 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.08
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsBaseline2.55 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.06
0.25% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.48 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.08
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsBaseline2.55 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.06
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.48 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.07
0.50% DHEAChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsWeek 122.07 Severity scoreStandard Error 0.06

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026