Bipolar I Disorder
Conditions
Keywords
Lurasidone, Latuda, Bipolar I
Brief summary
This is a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose, parallel-group study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone (in combination with lithium or divalproex) for the maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder in subjects with or without rapid cycling and /or psychotic features.
Detailed description
This study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone (in combination with lithium or divalproex) for the maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder in subjects with or without rapid cycling and/or psychotic features.
Interventions
Lurasidone 20 mg daily (days 1-3), Lurasidone 40 mg daily (days 4-7), Lurasidone 20-80 mg daily (flexible dose) thereafter
20-80 mg flexible dose
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Open-label Phase * 18 years of age or older * Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed., Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnosis of bipolar I disorder •≥ 1 manic, mixed manic, or depressed episode in past 2 years * YMRS or MADRS total score ≥ 14 if on lithium or divalproex; ≥ 18 if not on lithium or divalproex Double-blind Phase Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects must achieve consistent clinical stability, defined as total scores ≤ 12 on the YMRS and MADRS over at least 12 weeks, with the allowance of two excursions (YMRS and/or MADRS total scores up to 13 or 14, respectively) except during the last 4 weeks before randomization
Exclusion criteria
Open Label Phase * Diagnosis of an Axis I or Axis II disorder, other than bipolar I disorder, that is the primary focus of treatment within 3 months of screening * Subjects for whom diagnostic agreement between the Investigator and United BioSource Corporation (Boston) (UBC) cannot be reached * Ultra-fast rapid cycling (defined as ≥ 8 mood episodes over the previous 12-month period) * Subjects who test positive for drugs of abuse at screening. In the event a subject tests positive for cannabinoids (tetrahydrocannabinol), the Investigator will evaluate the subject's ability to abstain from cannabis during the study * Unstable/inadequately treated medical illness * The subjects answers yes to Suicidal Ideation items 4 or 5 on the C-SSRS (at time of evaluation) Double Blind Phase * Subjects who in the Investigator's judgment have not been compliant with study medication during the stabilization phase * Subjects who have not stabilized during the open-label phase (within 20 weeks) * Subjects who test positive for drugs of abuse at double-blind phase baseline. In the event a subject tests positive for cannabinoids (tetrahydrocannabinol), the Investigator will evaluate the subject's ability to abstain from cannabis during the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Recurrence of Mood Event During the Double Blind Treatment Phase | 28 weeks (up to 33 weeks) | A mood event is defined as one of the following during the double-blind phase: (1) Fulfilled Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed., Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for manic, mixed manic, hypomanic, or depressive episode. (2) Required treatment intervention for manic, mixed manic, hypomanic, or depressive symptoms with any antipsychotic (other than study drug), antidepressant, mood stabilizer (other than lithium or divalproex), anxiolytic agents, benzodiazepine (beyond dosage allowed for anxiety, agitation, or insomnia). (3) Psychiatric hospitalization for any bipolar mood episode. (4) Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) or Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≥ 18 or Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI BP S) score ≥ 4 at 2 consecutive assessments no more than 10 days apart. (5) Discontinuation from the study because of a mood event (as determined by the Investigator). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Recurrence of a Manic, Mixed Manic, Hypomanic, or Depressed Episode | 28 weeks (up to 33 weeks) | — |
| Percentage of Subjects Who Experience a Recurrence of a Manic, Mixed Manic, Hypomanic, or Depressed Episode | 28 weeks | — |
| Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI-BP-S Overall Score | Double-blind Baseline to week 28 | The CGI-BP-S overall score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of overall bipolar illness severity and ranges from 1=Normal, not at all ill, to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients. a higher score is associated with greater illness severity. |
| Change From Double -Blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI-BP-S Mania Score | Double-blind Baseline to week 28 | The CGI-BP-S mania score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of mania illness severity and ranges from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients. A high score is associated with greater illness severity |
| Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI+-BP-S Depression Score | Double-blind Baseline to week 28 | The CGI-BP-S depression score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of depression illness severity and ranges from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients. A higher score is associated with a greater illness severity. |
| Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in YMRS Total Score | Double-blind Baseline to week 28 | the YMRS is an 11-item instrument used to assess the severity of mania in subjects with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score). The YMRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 11 items. The YMRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of maia. |
| Time to All-cause Discontinuation | 28 weeks (up to 33 weeks) | — |
| Change Fro Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in QIDS-SR(16) Total Score | Double-blind Baseline to week 28 | The QIDS-SR16 is a 16-item self-report measure of depressive symptomatology which uses a computerized assessment interface for administration. The scoring system for the QIDS-SR16 converts responses to 16 separate items into nine DSM-IV symptom criterion domains. The nine domains comprise: depressed mood (Item 5); concentration/decision making (Item 10); self outlook (Item 11); suicidal ideation (Item 12); decreased interest (Item 13); decreased energy (Item 14); sleep disturbance (initial, middle, and late insomnia or hypersomnia) (highest score of Items 1 to 4); appetite/weight disturbance (highest score of Items 6 to 9); and psychomotor disturbance (highest score of Items 15 and 16). The QIDS-SR16 total score is calculated as the sum of the 9 domain scores. The QIDS-SR16 total score ranges from 0 to 27 with a high score indicating more severe symptoms. |
| Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOF) in PANSS Positive Symptom (PANNS-P) Subscale Score | Double-blind Baseline to week 28 | The PANSS-P is a subset of items in the PANSS, an interview-based measure of the severity of psychopathology in adults with psychotic disorders. The measure contains seven questions to assess delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS-P subscale score is the sum of the 7 items and ranges from 7 through 49. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity. |
| Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in SDS Total Score | Double-blind Baseline to week 28 | The SDS is a composite of three self-rated items designed to measure the extent to which three major sectors in the patient's life are impaired by depressive symptoms. The SDS total score is calculated as the sum of the 3 items. The SDS total score ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of global functional impairments. If a subject has not worked/studied at all during the past week for reasons unrelated to the disorder, the SDS total score will be set to missing. |
| Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in PIRS-2 Total Score | Double-blind Baseline to week 28 | The PIRS-2 is a 2-item self-report of insomnia assessed via a computer interface. Each item is scored from 0-3. The PIRS-2 total score is calculated as the sum of the 2 items. The PIRS total score ranges from 0 to 6. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of insomnia. |
| Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in Q-LES-Q-SF Percent Maximum Possible Score | Double-blind Baseline to week 28 | The Q-LES-Q-SF is a 16-item self-report measure of the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction in various areas of daily living. The questionnaire was developed and validated for use in depressed outpatient subjects and has eight summary scales that reflect major areas of functioning: physical health, mood, leisure time activities, social relationships, general activities, work, household duties and school/coursework. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). The Q-LES-Q-SF percentage maximum possible score is calculated as 100 × (Raw Score - 14 \[Minimum Score\]) / (70 \[Maximum Score\] - 14 \[Minimum Score\]). Higher percent maximum scores indicate better quality of life. |
| Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in MADRS Total Score | Double-blind Baseline to week 28 | The MADRS consists of 10 items, each rated on a Likert scale, from 0=Normal to 6=Most Severe. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 items. The MADRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of depressive symptoms. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Bulgaria, Chile, Croatia, Czechia, France, Hungary, Japan, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
There were 2 phases in this study. In Phase 1 (Open-label Stabilization Phase), there was 1 reporting group. In phase 2 (Double-blind Maintenance Phase), there were 2 reporting groups. 7 subjects completed the open-label but were not randomized DB(3- mood episode,3-not meeting the criteria for the DB phase,and 1-insufficient clinical response)
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose Lurasidone: Lurasidone 20 mg daily (days 1-3), Lurasidone 40 mg daily (days 4-7), Lurasidone 20-80 mg daily (flexible dose) thereafter | 246 |
| Placebo Placebo: 20-80 mg flexible dose | 250 |
| Total | 496 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double-Blind Phase | Administrative | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Phase | Adverse Event | 8 | 5 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Phase | Lost to Follow-up | 5 | 7 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Phase | Protocol Violation | 1 | 11 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Phase | Recurrence of mood event | 48 | 64 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Phase | Terminated at study completion | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Open Label Phase | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 59 |
| Open Label Phase | Did not meet criteria for DB phase | 0 | 0 | 16 |
| Open Label Phase | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 107 |
| Open Label Phase | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 76 |
| Open Label Phase | Mood episode | 0 | 0 | 42 |
| Open Label Phase | Protocol Violation | 0 | 0 | 45 |
| Open Label Phase | Terminated at study completion | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Open Label Phase | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 112 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 8 Participants | 12 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 242 Participants | 232 Participants | 474 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 43.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.18 | 45.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.43 | 44.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.36 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 38 Participants | 41 Participants | 79 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 212 Participants | 205 Participants | 417 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 7 Participants | 6 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 21 Participants | 23 Participants | 44 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 216 Participants | 213 Participants | 429 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Argentina | 19 participants | 19 participants | 38 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Bulgaria | 20 participants | 20 participants | 40 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Chile | 11 participants | 9 participants | 20 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Czech Republic | 24 participants | 23 participants | 47 participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 6 participants | 8 participants | 14 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Hungary | 15 participants | 13 participants | 28 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 5 participants | 5 participants | 10 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 21 participants | 22 participants | 43 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Russian Federation | 31 participants | 30 participants | 61 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Serbia | 19 participants | 20 participants | 39 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Slovakia | 3 participants | 4 participants | 7 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 76 participants | 73 participants | 149 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 143 Participants | 136 Participants | 279 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 107 Participants | 110 Participants | 217 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 81 / 246 | 81 / 250 | 474 / 962 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 13 / 246 | 11 / 250 | 41 / 962 |
Outcome results
Time to Recurrence of Mood Event During the Double Blind Treatment Phase
A mood event is defined as one of the following during the double-blind phase: (1) Fulfilled Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed., Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for manic, mixed manic, hypomanic, or depressive episode. (2) Required treatment intervention for manic, mixed manic, hypomanic, or depressive symptoms with any antipsychotic (other than study drug), antidepressant, mood stabilizer (other than lithium or divalproex), anxiolytic agents, benzodiazepine (beyond dosage allowed for anxiety, agitation, or insomnia). (3) Psychiatric hospitalization for any bipolar mood episode. (4) Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) or Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≥ 18 or Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI BP S) score ≥ 4 at 2 consecutive assessments no more than 10 days apart. (5) Discontinuation from the study because of a mood event (as determined by the Investigator).
Time frame: 28 weeks (up to 33 weeks)
Population: ITT (Intent to treat) population: all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication in the double-blind phase. Subjects were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose | Time to Recurrence of Mood Event During the Double Blind Treatment Phase | NA Days |
| Placebo | Time to Recurrence of Mood Event During the Double Blind Treatment Phase | 207 Days |
Change Fro Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in QIDS-SR(16) Total Score
The QIDS-SR16 is a 16-item self-report measure of depressive symptomatology which uses a computerized assessment interface for administration. The scoring system for the QIDS-SR16 converts responses to 16 separate items into nine DSM-IV symptom criterion domains. The nine domains comprise: depressed mood (Item 5); concentration/decision making (Item 10); self outlook (Item 11); suicidal ideation (Item 12); decreased interest (Item 13); decreased energy (Item 14); sleep disturbance (initial, middle, and late insomnia or hypersomnia) (highest score of Items 1 to 4); appetite/weight disturbance (highest score of Items 6 to 9); and psychomotor disturbance (highest score of Items 15 and 16). The QIDS-SR16 total score is calculated as the sum of the 9 domain scores. The QIDS-SR16 total score ranges from 0 to 27 with a high score indicating more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Double-blind Baseline to week 28
Population: ITT population: all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication in the double-blind phase. Subjects were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized. 7 lurasidone + Li/VPA subjects and 7 placebo +Li/VPA subjects did not have post-DB baseline QIDS-SR16 total score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose | Change Fro Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in QIDS-SR(16) Total Score | 0.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.27 |
| Placebo | Change Fro Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in QIDS-SR(16) Total Score | 1.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.27 |
Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI+-BP-S Depression Score
The CGI-BP-S depression score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of depression illness severity and ranges from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients. A higher score is associated with a greater illness severity.
Time frame: Double-blind Baseline to week 28
Population: ITT population: all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication in the double-blind phase. Subjects were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized. 2 lurasidone + Li/VPA subjects did not have post-DB baseline CGI-BP-S depression score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI+-BP-S Depression Score | 0.35 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.082 |
| Placebo | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI+-BP-S Depression Score | 0.42 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.081 |
Change From Double -Blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI-BP-S Mania Score
The CGI-BP-S mania score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of mania illness severity and ranges from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients. A high score is associated with greater illness severity
Time frame: Double-blind Baseline to week 28
Population: ITT population: all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication in the double-blind phase. Subjects were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized. . 2 lurasidone + Li/VPA subjects did not have post-DB baseline CGI-BP-S mania score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose | Change From Double -Blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI-BP-S Mania Score | 0.10 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.062 |
| Placebo | Change From Double -Blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI-BP-S Mania Score | 0.21 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.062 |
Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI-BP-S Overall Score
The CGI-BP-S overall score is a single value, clinician-rated assessment of overall bipolar illness severity and ranges from 1=Normal, not at all ill, to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients. a higher score is associated with greater illness severity.
Time frame: Double-blind Baseline to week 28
Population: ITT population: all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication in the double-blind phase. Subjects were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized. 2 lurasidone + Li/VPA subjects did not have post-DB baseline CGI-BP-S overall score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI-BP-S Overall Score | 0.40 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.085 |
| Placebo | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in CGI-BP-S Overall Score | 0.49 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.085 |
Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in MADRS Total Score
The MADRS consists of 10 items, each rated on a Likert scale, from 0=Normal to 6=Most Severe. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 items. The MADRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Double-blind Baseline to week 28
Population: ITT population: all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication in the double-blind phase. Subjects were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized. 2 lurasidone + Li/VPA subjects did not have post-DB baseline MADRS total score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in MADRS Total Score | 3.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.57 |
| Placebo | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in MADRS Total Score | 3.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.57 |
Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in PIRS-2 Total Score
The PIRS-2 is a 2-item self-report of insomnia assessed via a computer interface. Each item is scored from 0-3. The PIRS-2 total score is calculated as the sum of the 2 items. The PIRS total score ranges from 0 to 6. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of insomnia.
Time frame: Double-blind Baseline to week 28
Population: ITT Population: all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication in the double-blind phase. Subjects were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized. . 7 lurasidone + Li/VPA subjects and 7 placebo +Li/VPA subjects did not have post-DB baseline PIRS-2 total score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in PIRS-2 Total Score | 0.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in PIRS-2 Total Score | 0.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in Q-LES-Q-SF Percent Maximum Possible Score
The Q-LES-Q-SF is a 16-item self-report measure of the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction in various areas of daily living. The questionnaire was developed and validated for use in depressed outpatient subjects and has eight summary scales that reflect major areas of functioning: physical health, mood, leisure time activities, social relationships, general activities, work, household duties and school/coursework. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). The Q-LES-Q-SF percentage maximum possible score is calculated as 100 × (Raw Score - 14 \[Minimum Score\]) / (70 \[Maximum Score\] - 14 \[Minimum Score\]). Higher percent maximum scores indicate better quality of life.
Time frame: Double-blind Baseline to week 28
Population: ITT Population: all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication in the double-blind phase. Subjects were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized. . 12 lurasidone + Li/VPA subjects and 11 placebo +Li/VPA subjects did not have post-DB baseline Q-LES-Q-SF percent maximum possible score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in Q-LES-Q-SF Percent Maximum Possible Score | -1.70 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.022 |
| Placebo | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in Q-LES-Q-SF Percent Maximum Possible Score | -2.07 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.035 |
Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in SDS Total Score
The SDS is a composite of three self-rated items designed to measure the extent to which three major sectors in the patient's life are impaired by depressive symptoms. The SDS total score is calculated as the sum of the 3 items. The SDS total score ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of global functional impairments. If a subject has not worked/studied at all during the past week for reasons unrelated to the disorder, the SDS total score will be set to missing.
Time frame: Double-blind Baseline to week 28
Population: ITT Population: all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication in the double-blind phase. Subjects were analyzed based on treatment they were randomized. 63 lurasidone + Li/VPA subjects and 57 placebo +Li/VPA subjects did not have post-DB baseline SDS total score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in SDS Total Score | 0.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.59 |
| Placebo | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in SDS Total Score | 0.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.61 |
Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in YMRS Total Score
the YMRS is an 11-item instrument used to assess the severity of mania in subjects with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score). The YMRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 11 items. The YMRS total score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores are associated with greater severity of maia.
Time frame: Double-blind Baseline to week 28
Population: ITT population: all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication in the double-blind phase. Subjects were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized. . 2 lurasidone + Li/VPA subjects did not have post-DB baseline YMRS total score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in YMRS Total Score | 1.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.43 |
| Placebo | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOCF) in YMRS Total Score | 1.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.43 |
Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOF) in PANSS Positive Symptom (PANNS-P) Subscale Score
The PANSS-P is a subset of items in the PANSS, an interview-based measure of the severity of psychopathology in adults with psychotic disorders. The measure contains seven questions to assess delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. An anchored Likert scale from 1-7, where values of 2 and above indicate the presence of progressively more severe symptoms, is used to score each item. The PANSS-P subscale score is the sum of the 7 items and ranges from 7 through 49. A higher score is associated with greater illness severity.
Time frame: Double-blind Baseline to week 28
Population: ITT Population: all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication in the double-blind phase. Subjects were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized. . 6 lurasidone + Li/VPA subjects and 3 placebo +Li/VPA subjects did not have post-DB baseline PANSS-P score.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOF) in PANSS Positive Symptom (PANNS-P) Subscale Score | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Placebo | Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 28 (LOF) in PANSS Positive Symptom (PANNS-P) Subscale Score | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
Percentage of Subjects Who Experience a Recurrence of a Manic, Mixed Manic, Hypomanic, or Depressed Episode
Time frame: 28 weeks
Population: ITT population: all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication in the double-blind phase. Subjects were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose | Percentage of Subjects Who Experience a Recurrence of a Manic, Mixed Manic, Hypomanic, or Depressed Episode | 16.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Subjects Who Experience a Recurrence of a Manic, Mixed Manic, Hypomanic, or Depressed Episode | 21.6 percentage of participants |
Time to All-cause Discontinuation
Time frame: 28 weeks (up to 33 weeks)
Population: ITT population: all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication in the double-blind phase. Subjects were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose | Time to All-cause Discontinuation | 225 Days |
| Placebo | Time to All-cause Discontinuation | 207 Days |
Time to Recurrence of a Manic, Mixed Manic, Hypomanic, or Depressed Episode
Time frame: 28 weeks (up to 33 weeks)
Population: ITT population: all subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication in the double-blind phase. Subjects were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20-80 mg Flexible Dose | Time to Recurrence of a Manic, Mixed Manic, Hypomanic, or Depressed Episode | NA Days |
| Placebo | Time to Recurrence of a Manic, Mixed Manic, Hypomanic, or Depressed Episode | NA Days |