Skip to content

Emergency Department-Based Palliative Care for Advanced Cancer Patients

Emergency Department-Based Palliative Care for Advanced Cancer Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01358110
Enrollment
136
Registered
2011-05-23
Start date
2011-05-31
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2015-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Cancer, Metastatic Cancer

Keywords

palliative care, cancer, emergency medicine, end- of- life care

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to: 1) identify the palliative care needs of Emergency Department patients with advanced cancer, and determine if these needs can be rapidly assessed in the ED; 2) determine whether early palliative care consultation improves survival, quality of life and other burdensome symptoms and decreases utilization as compared to usual care.

Detailed description

As the population ages, the number of individual living with cancer will continue to rise, and the number of Emergency Department (ED) visits for this population will continue to increase. Cancer patients visit EDs because symptoms, such as pain or vomiting, can't be controlled at home, in an assisted living facility, or in their provider's office. The ED is often the only place that can provide the necessary treatments as well as immediate access to technologically advanced testing for those with cancer. However, palliative care (PC) services, such as relief of burdensome symptoms), attention to spiritual or social concerns, and establishing goals of care, is not standard care in the ED outside of a few medical centers. Most patients do not have well-defined goals of care, and are often subjected to painful and marginally effective tests and procedures, not because they are consistent with their goals but because it is less time-consuming than discussing other options and has less perceived legal risk. Until recently little emphasis has been placed on education, research, or guidelines for the delivery of PC services in this important setting. While emergency providers could provide some of these services themselves, knowledge and skills regarding PC as well as staffing are currently inadequate to provide comprehensive services. In addition to further decreasing days spent in the hospital and health care costs, consultation by a PC team for ED cancer patients might also reduce pain and other symptoms, aid in complex medical decision-making regarding testing and treatments, and facilitate transfer to hospice or home with visiting nurse services. To enable PC consultation for ED cancer patients, the investigators will first determine who could benefit from emergent consultation, what services they need, and what characteristics of emergency providers and hospitals are preventing them from being offered. To determine what affect PC consultation for patients with advanced cancer has on symptoms, discussions with patients and families about goals of care, and how long patients spend in the ED, the investigators will then randomly assign 200 ED cancer patients to targeted PC consultation versus usual or standard care.

Interventions

OTHEREarly palliative care consultation

Patients will have symptoms assessed, have goals of care discussion with family and team present, and surrogate designated, as well as coordination of care and home services.

OTHERCare as usual

Standard care as usual which may or may not include palliative care consultation

Sponsors

American Cancer Society, Inc.
CollaboratorOTHER
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ≥ 18 years age * Speak English or Spanish * ED patient with an advanced solid malignancy

Exclusion criteria

* Have already been seen by palliative care team * Cognitive deficits * Children or adolescents * No confirmed history of active cancer * Do not speak English or Spanish * Reside outside the US

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life and quality of mental health at 6 weeks and 12 weeks as compared from baselineat baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeksComparison of life and quality of mental health from baseline to 6 weeks and 12 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inpatient costs per day/cost of stay during hospitalization6 months after hospital dischargeCosts per day during incident admission and total cost of entire incident hospital stay
Hospital length of stay6 months after hospital dischargeNumber of days hospitalized for incident admission: i.e., date of admission and date of discharge, difference between those two dates.
Survivalat time of enrollmentSurvival days from day of enrollment to day of death or study termination
Readmissions within 6 months of discharge6 months from hospital discharge
Repeat visits to the ED in 6 months6 months from hospital discharge

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026