Skip to content

Evaluation of Diagnostic Value of 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Suspected Prostate Cancer

Evaluation of Diagnostic Value of 3-T MRI in Suspected Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01357512
Enrollment
130
Registered
2011-05-20
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2017-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Keywords

prostate cancer diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging, prostate biopsy

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of suspected prostate cancer. Men with suspected prostate cancer based on serum prostate-specific antigen antigen (PSA) value are included. Men are randomized to pre-biopsy MRI or no MRI groups in ratio 1:1. Standard transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies will be taken in addition to extra biopsies from lesions suspicious based on MRI evaluation. Hypothesis is that more prostate cancers will be found after MRI evaluation.

Interventions

DEVICEmagnetic resonance imaging, Siemens

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of prostate with Siemens 3-tesla device

Sponsors

Oulu University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Oulu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 72 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent * Suspected prostate cancer based on PSA value (total PSA 2,5-10 ng/ml and PSA free to total ratio \<=0.15, or total PSA 10-20 ng/ml) * PSA and serum creatinine measurement less than 60 days before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies * No evidence of PSA increase by non-cancerous factors (catheterization, bladder stones, urinary tract infection including bacterial prostatitis)

Exclusion criteria

* Previous prostate biopsies * Previous prostate surgery * Contraindication for MRI (such as pacemaker or inner ear implant) * Claustrophobia * Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<40 ml/min * Suspected clinical T3-T4 prostate cancer based on digital rectal examination * Contraindication for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies * body mass index \>30

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Prostate Cancer Diagnoses in MRI and no MRI Groupsat the end of the study (up to 1 year)The number of patients with confirmed prostate cancer among men with MRI performed before biopsies are compared to the number of patients with prostate cancer confirmed in prostate biopsies without MRI. The number patients with prostate cancer are counted as total from cancers detected in random biopsies and in biopsies targeted based on suspicious MRI findings in MRI group, and from random biopsies in no MRI group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Positive Biopsies in MRI and no MRI Groupsat the end of the study (up to 1 year)The number of biopsies with histology confirming prostate cancer are compared between MRI and no MRI groups. This measure will clarify if prostate cancer can be diagnosed more accurately, i.e. more biopsies with confirmed prostate cancer, after MRI. Ten or 12 biopsies will be taken from prostates below 30 grams, or equal or above 30 grams, respectively.
Proportion of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancers Detected in MRI and no MRI Groupsat the end of the study (up to 1 year)Number of clinically significant prostate cancers detected with and without MRI. Clinically significant prostate cancer is determined by the Gleason grading and be the number of cancer-positive biopsy cores.

Countries

Finland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MRI Done
Subjects with MRI prior prostate biopsies magnetic resonance imaging, Siemens: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of prostate with Siemens 3-tesla device
53
no MRI
No MRI before prostate biopsies
60
Total113

Baseline characteristics

Characteristicno MRITotalMRI Done
Age, Continuous62 years62 years63 years
Region of Enrollment
Finland
60 participants113 participants53 participants
Serum prostate-specific antigen level6.2 ng/ml6.1 ng/ml6.1 ng/ml
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
60 Participants113 Participants53 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 531 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 530 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Prostate Cancer Diagnoses in MRI and no MRI Groups

The number of patients with confirmed prostate cancer among men with MRI performed before biopsies are compared to the number of patients with prostate cancer confirmed in prostate biopsies without MRI. The number patients with prostate cancer are counted as total from cancers detected in random biopsies and in biopsies targeted based on suspicious MRI findings in MRI group, and from random biopsies in no MRI group.

Time frame: at the end of the study (up to 1 year)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MRI DoneNumber of Prostate Cancer Diagnoses in MRI and no MRI Groups34 participants
no MRINumber of Prostate Cancer Diagnoses in MRI and no MRI Groups34 participants
Secondary

Number of Positive Biopsies in MRI and no MRI Groups

The number of biopsies with histology confirming prostate cancer are compared between MRI and no MRI groups. This measure will clarify if prostate cancer can be diagnosed more accurately, i.e. more biopsies with confirmed prostate cancer, after MRI. Ten or 12 biopsies will be taken from prostates below 30 grams, or equal or above 30 grams, respectively.

Time frame: at the end of the study (up to 1 year)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MRI DoneNumber of Positive Biopsies in MRI and no MRI Groups3.0 number of cancer-positive biopsy cores
no MRINumber of Positive Biopsies in MRI and no MRI Groups3.0 number of cancer-positive biopsy cores
Secondary

Proportion of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancers Detected in MRI and no MRI Groups

Number of clinically significant prostate cancers detected with and without MRI. Clinically significant prostate cancer is determined by the Gleason grading and be the number of cancer-positive biopsy cores.

Time frame: at the end of the study (up to 1 year)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026