Skip to content

A Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Combination With Methotrexate in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Non-biologic DMARDs

An Open Label, Local, Multicenter , Phase IIIb Interventional Study to Assess the Efficacy of Tocilizumab (TCZ) in Combination With Methotrexate (MTX) in Indonesian Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Non-biologic DMARDs

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01353859
Enrollment
39
Registered
2011-05-16
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2012-07-31
Last updated
2014-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This multicenter, open-label, single arm study will assess the safety and efficacy of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who have an inadequate response to non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Patients will receive RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions plus methotrexate 10-25 mg orally weekly. Anticipated time on study treatment is 24 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGtocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]

8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions

DRUGmethotrexate

10-25 mg orally weekly

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients, \>/= 18 years of age * Moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of \>/= 6 months duration * Prior treatment with DMARDs for \>/= 12 weeks (at stable dose for \>/= 8 weeks) * Inadequate clinical response to stable dose of non-biologic DMARD (either single or in combination)

Exclusion criteria

* Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 6 months following enrollment * Autoimmune disease other than RA * History of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA * Previous treatment with any biologic drug that is used in the treatment of RA * Intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to baseline * Impaired liver, renal or hematologic function * Active current or history of recurrent infection * History of or currently active primary or secondary immunodeficiency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity ScoreWeek 24Disease Activity Score using 28-Joint Count (DAS28) was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (≤3.2) equals (=) low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (\>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 ScoreWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity; a clinically significant improvement in DAS28 score was defined as a reduction of at least 1.2 units.
Time to Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity; a clinically significant improvement is a reduction in DAS28 score of at least 1.2 units. Time to clinically significant improvement was determined in weeks from the date of first infusion to the date of first achievement of reduction of 1.2 units in DAS28.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Remission was defined as DAS28 \<2.6.
Time to Achieve DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 remission was defined as DAS28 \<2.6. Time to achieve remission was calculated in weeks as the time from the date of first infusion to the date of first achieving remission.
Time to Achieve Low Disease Activity (DAS28 ≤3.2)Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 ≤3.2 = low disease activity; time to low disease activity was calculated as the time in weeks from the date of first infusion to the first achievement of DAS28 ≤3.2
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, and 70% Improvement (ACR20, ACR50, or ACR70) ResponseWeek 24ACR20/50/70 response was defined as ≥20%, ≥50%, or ≥70% improvement, respectively, in swollen/tender joint count (66 joints assessed for swelling and 68 joints assessed for tenderness) as well as improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the health assessment questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and acute phase response: C-reactive protein (CRP) or ESR.
Erythrocyte Sedimentation RateBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Erythrocyte Sedimentation rate was measured in mm/hour and was used to determine the acute phase response. Lower ESR values indicate reduction in disease activity; normal reference range: 0-20 mm/hr.
C-Reactive Protein LevelsBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12,16, 20, and 24CRP levels were measured in milligrams/liter (mg/L) and were used to determine the acute phase response. A reduction in CRP levels is considered an improvement; normal reference range ≤10 mg/L.
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by VisitBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 ≤3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.

Countries

Indonesia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tocilizumab + MTX
Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (minimum dose 480 mg, maximum dose 800 mg), IV, once every 4 weeks (maximum number of infusions received was 6) and MTX, 10-25 mg per week, at a stable dose; the dose and route of administration of MTX at entry in the study was to be continued without change while on study unless an adjustment was necessary for safety reasons. All participants treated with MTX received either folic acid or leucovorin according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
39
Total39

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event3
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTocilizumab + MTX
Age, Continuous53 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
37 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Score

Disease Activity Score using 28-Joint Count (DAS28) was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (≤3.2) equals (=) low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (\>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population: All participants randomized in the study who received administration of at least one dose of the study drug and who had the last week 24 assessment performed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Score100 percentage of participants
Secondary

C-Reactive Protein Levels

CRP levels were measured in milligrams/liter (mg/L) and were used to determine the acute phase response. A reduction in CRP levels is considered an improvement; normal reference range ≤10 mg/L.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12,16, 20, and 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MTXC-Reactive Protein LevelsBaseline17.6 mg/LStandard Deviation 21.6
Tocilizumab + MTXC-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 42.1 mg/LStandard Deviation 8.5
Tocilizumab + MTXC-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 80.8 mg/LStandard Deviation 1.9
Tocilizumab + MTXC-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 120.5 mg/LStandard Deviation 1
Tocilizumab + MTXC-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 161.2 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.4
Tocilizumab + MTXC-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 201.0 mg/LStandard Deviation 2.6
Tocilizumab + MTXC-Reactive Protein LevelsWeek 240.4 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

Erythrocyte Sedimentation rate was measured in mm/hour and was used to determine the acute phase response. Lower ESR values indicate reduction in disease activity; normal reference range: 0-20 mm/hr.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MTXErythrocyte Sedimentation RateBaseline48.1 mm/hrStandard Deviation 26.1
Tocilizumab + MTXErythrocyte Sedimentation RateWeek 410.7 mm/hrStandard Deviation 13.5
Tocilizumab + MTXErythrocyte Sedimentation RateWeek 89.1 mm/hrStandard Deviation 10.5
Tocilizumab + MTXErythrocyte Sedimentation RateWeek 126.3 mm/hrStandard Deviation 4.3
Tocilizumab + MTXErythrocyte Sedimentation RateWeek 168.3 mm/hrStandard Deviation 8.3
Tocilizumab + MTXErythrocyte Sedimentation RateWeek 206.6 mm/hrStandard Deviation 4.3
Tocilizumab + MTXErythrocyte Sedimentation RateWeek 245.8 mm/hrStandard Deviation 3.3
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, and 70% Improvement (ACR20, ACR50, or ACR70) Response

ACR20/50/70 response was defined as ≥20%, ≥50%, or ≥70% improvement, respectively, in swollen/tender joint count (66 joints assessed for swelling and 68 joints assessed for tenderness) as well as improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the health assessment questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and acute phase response: C-reactive protein (CRP) or ESR.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, and 70% Improvement (ACR20, ACR50, or ACR70) ResponseACR2020 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, and 70% Improvement (ACR20, ACR50, or ACR70) ResponseACR5034 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, and 70% Improvement (ACR20, ACR50, or ACR70) ResponseACR7034 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)

DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Remission was defined as DAS28 \<2.6.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)Week 1659.0 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)Baseline0.0 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)Week 420.5 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)Week 836.8 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)Week 1244.7 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)Week 2074.4 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)Week 2482.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 Score

DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity; a clinically significant improvement in DAS28 score was defined as a reduction of at least 1.2 units.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 ScoreWeek 487.2 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 ScoreWeek 891.9 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 ScoreWeek 1294.7 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 ScoreWeek 1697.3 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 ScoreWeek 2097.3 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 ScoreWeek 24100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by Visit

DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 ≤3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by VisitBaseline0.0 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by VisitWeek 430.8 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by VisitWeek 848.7 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by VisitWeek 1269.2 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by VisitWeek 1682.1 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by VisitWeek 2089.7 percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MTXPercentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by VisitWeek 24100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Achieve DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)

DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 remission was defined as DAS28 \<2.6. Time to achieve remission was calculated in weeks as the time from the date of first infusion to the date of first achieving remission.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MTXTime to Achieve DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)4.4 weeksStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Time to Achieve Low Disease Activity (DAS28 ≤3.2)

DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 ≤3.2 = low disease activity; time to low disease activity was calculated as the time in weeks from the date of first infusion to the first achievement of DAS28 ≤3.2

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MTXTime to Achieve Low Disease Activity (DAS28 ≤3.2)9.5 weeksStandard Deviation 5.3
Secondary

Time to Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28

DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity; a clinically significant improvement is a reduction in DAS28 score of at least 1.2 units. Time to clinically significant improvement was determined in weeks from the date of first infusion to the date of first achievement of reduction of 1.2 units in DAS28.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MTXTime to Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS2812.5 weeksStandard Deviation 6.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026