Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
This multicenter, open-label, single arm study will assess the safety and efficacy of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who have an inadequate response to non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Patients will receive RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions plus methotrexate 10-25 mg orally weekly. Anticipated time on study treatment is 24 weeks.
Interventions
8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions
10-25 mg orally weekly
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients, \>/= 18 years of age * Moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of \>/= 6 months duration * Prior treatment with DMARDs for \>/= 12 weeks (at stable dose for \>/= 8 weeks) * Inadequate clinical response to stable dose of non-biologic DMARD (either single or in combination)
Exclusion criteria
* Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 6 months following enrollment * Autoimmune disease other than RA * History of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA * Previous treatment with any biologic drug that is used in the treatment of RA * Intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to baseline * Impaired liver, renal or hematologic function * Active current or history of recurrent infection * History of or currently active primary or secondary immunodeficiency
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Score | Week 24 | Disease Activity Score using 28-Joint Count (DAS28) was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (≤3.2) equals (=) low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (\>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 Score | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 | DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity; a clinically significant improvement in DAS28 score was defined as a reduction of at least 1.2 units. |
| Time to Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 | DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity; a clinically significant improvement is a reduction in DAS28 score of at least 1.2 units. Time to clinically significant improvement was determined in weeks from the date of first infusion to the date of first achievement of reduction of 1.2 units in DAS28. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Remission was defined as DAS28 \<2.6. |
| Time to Achieve DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 | DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 remission was defined as DAS28 \<2.6. Time to achieve remission was calculated in weeks as the time from the date of first infusion to the date of first achieving remission. |
| Time to Achieve Low Disease Activity (DAS28 ≤3.2) | Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 ≤3.2 = low disease activity; time to low disease activity was calculated as the time in weeks from the date of first infusion to the first achievement of DAS28 ≤3.2 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, and 70% Improvement (ACR20, ACR50, or ACR70) Response | Week 24 | ACR20/50/70 response was defined as ≥20%, ≥50%, or ≥70% improvement, respectively, in swollen/tender joint count (66 joints assessed for swelling and 68 joints assessed for tenderness) as well as improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the health assessment questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and acute phase response: C-reactive protein (CRP) or ESR. |
| Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | Erythrocyte Sedimentation rate was measured in mm/hour and was used to determine the acute phase response. Lower ESR values indicate reduction in disease activity; normal reference range: 0-20 mm/hr. |
| C-Reactive Protein Levels | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12,16, 20, and 24 | CRP levels were measured in milligrams/liter (mg/L) and were used to determine the acute phase response. A reduction in CRP levels is considered an improvement; normal reference range ≤10 mg/L. |
| Percentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by Visit | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 ≤3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity. |
Countries
Indonesia
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + MTX Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (minimum dose 480 mg, maximum dose 800 mg), IV, once every 4 weeks (maximum number of infusions received was 6) and MTX, 10-25 mg per week, at a stable dose; the dose and route of administration of MTX at entry in the study was to be continued without change while on study unless an adjustment was necessary for safety reasons. All participants treated with MTX received either folic acid or leucovorin according to the manufacturer's recommendations. | 39 |
| Total | 39 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 3 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Tocilizumab + MTX |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 53 years |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 36 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 3 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 37 / 39 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 2 / 39 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Score
Disease Activity Score using 28-Joint Count (DAS28) was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (≤3.2) equals (=) low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (\>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population: All participants randomized in the study who received administration of at least one dose of the study drug and who had the last week 24 assessment performed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Score | 100 percentage of participants |
C-Reactive Protein Levels
CRP levels were measured in milligrams/liter (mg/L) and were used to determine the acute phase response. A reduction in CRP levels is considered an improvement; normal reference range ≤10 mg/L.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12,16, 20, and 24
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + MTX | C-Reactive Protein Levels | Baseline | 17.6 mg/L | Standard Deviation 21.6 |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | C-Reactive Protein Levels | Week 4 | 2.1 mg/L | Standard Deviation 8.5 |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | C-Reactive Protein Levels | Week 8 | 0.8 mg/L | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | C-Reactive Protein Levels | Week 12 | 0.5 mg/L | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | C-Reactive Protein Levels | Week 16 | 1.2 mg/L | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | C-Reactive Protein Levels | Week 20 | 1.0 mg/L | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | C-Reactive Protein Levels | Week 24 | 0.4 mg/L | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Erythrocyte Sedimentation rate was measured in mm/hour and was used to determine the acute phase response. Lower ESR values indicate reduction in disease activity; normal reference range: 0-20 mm/hr.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate | Baseline | 48.1 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 26.1 |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate | Week 4 | 10.7 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 13.5 |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate | Week 8 | 9.1 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 10.5 |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate | Week 12 | 6.3 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate | Week 16 | 8.3 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate | Week 20 | 6.6 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate | Week 24 | 5.8 mm/hr | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, and 70% Improvement (ACR20, ACR50, or ACR70) Response
ACR20/50/70 response was defined as ≥20%, ≥50%, or ≥70% improvement, respectively, in swollen/tender joint count (66 joints assessed for swelling and 68 joints assessed for tenderness) as well as improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the health assessment questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and acute phase response: C-reactive protein (CRP) or ESR.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, and 70% Improvement (ACR20, ACR50, or ACR70) Response | ACR20 | 20 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, and 70% Improvement (ACR20, ACR50, or ACR70) Response | ACR50 | 34 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, and 70% Improvement (ACR20, ACR50, or ACR70) Response | ACR70 | 34 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)
DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Remission was defined as DAS28 \<2.6.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | Week 16 | 59.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | Baseline | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | Week 4 | 20.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | Week 8 | 36.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | Week 12 | 44.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | Week 20 | 74.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | Week 24 | 82.1 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 Score
DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity; a clinically significant improvement in DAS28 score was defined as a reduction of at least 1.2 units.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 Score | Week 4 | 87.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 Score | Week 8 | 91.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 Score | Week 12 | 94.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 Score | Week 16 | 97.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 Score | Week 20 | 97.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 Score | Week 24 | 100 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by Visit
DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 ≤3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by Visit | Baseline | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by Visit | Week 4 | 30.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by Visit | Week 8 | 48.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by Visit | Week 12 | 69.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by Visit | Week 16 | 82.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by Visit | Week 20 | 89.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Percentage of Participants With DAS28 <3.2 by Visit | Week 24 | 100 percentage of participants |
Time to Achieve DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)
DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 remission was defined as DAS28 \<2.6. Time to achieve remission was calculated in weeks as the time from the date of first infusion to the date of first achieving remission.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Time to Achieve DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | 4.4 weeks | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
Time to Achieve Low Disease Activity (DAS28 ≤3.2)
DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 ≤3.2 = low disease activity; time to low disease activity was calculated as the time in weeks from the date of first infusion to the first achievement of DAS28 ≤3.2
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Time to Achieve Low Disease Activity (DAS28 ≤3.2) | 9.5 weeks | Standard Deviation 5.3 |
Time to Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28
DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hour) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity; a clinically significant improvement is a reduction in DAS28 score of at least 1.2 units. Time to clinically significant improvement was determined in weeks from the date of first infusion to the date of first achievement of reduction of 1.2 units in DAS28.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + MTX | Time to Clinically Significant Improvement in DAS28 | 12.5 weeks | Standard Deviation 6.3 |