Skip to content

Efficacy of System Constellations in a General Population

Randomized Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of System Constellations on Psychological Well-being in a General Population Based Sample

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01352325
Enrollment
216
Registered
2011-05-11
Start date
2011-02-28
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2012-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psychological Well-being

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of system constellations in a monocentric, single-masked randomized controlled trial. The method of system constellations refers to an approach which integrates ideas from family systems therapy with elements from psychodrama. The constellations are conducted in a group based seminar-setting, each seminar lasting three days. Based on the model of a general psychotherapy and the consistency theory, the effects of system constellations on psychological functioning are explored. It is predicted that participation in a system constellation seminar changes the level of psychological functioning at 4 months.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALsystem constellations seminar

individual-centered intervention in a group setting, duration 3 days

Sponsors

Heidelberg University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* agreement to participate in a 3-day system constellations seminar * agreement to be randomized into treatment group or control group (waiting condition) * agreement not to participate in another system constellation seminar until completion of study

Exclusion criteria

* acute suicidal tendency * acute psychotic episode * acute drug or alcohol intoxication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline in psychological well-being at 2 weeks and four monthsBaseline, day of treatment, 2 weeks after treatment, 4 months after treatmentPsychological well-being will be assessed using the 'Outcome Questionnaire' in its German version (EB-45). The EB-45 is a brief 45-item self report outcome/tracking instrument designed for repeated measurement of client progress through the course of psychotherapy and following termination. The scales of the EB-45 measure symptom distress, interpersonal functioning, and social role.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline in Psychological distress after 2 weeks and 4 monthsBaseline, day of treatment, 2 weeks after treatment, 4 months after treatmentThe FEP-2, 40-item self report questionnaire, measures psychological distress according to the phase model of therapeutic change as well as the interpersonal model of psychological distress.
Change from Baseline in Incongruence at 2 weeks and 4 monthsBaseline, day of treatment, 2 weeks after treatment, 4 months after treatmentMotivational incongruence is defined as the unsatisfactory realization of motivational goals and is based on the concept of General Psychotherapy by Klaus Grawe. The Incongruence Questionnaire (INK) is an instrument that assesses motivational incongruence, defined as the discrepancy between a person's motivational goals and his/her perception of reality. The short version of this questionnaire that will be used in our study (K-INK) comprises 23 items.
Goal achievement at 2 weeks and 4 monthsday of treatment, 2 weeks after treatment, 4 months after treatmentGoal achievement will be assessed using Goal Attainment Scaling as a method for the assimilation of achievement in a number of individually set goals into a single aggregated 'goal attainment score', providing a person-centred outcome, focused on that individual's priorities. Goal attainment scaling is operationalized by an open-ended question, in which study participants descriobe their individual goals. In a second step these goals will be coded according to the Bern inventory of psychotherapy goals (BIT-C).
Change from Baseline in 'Experiences in family and organisational systems' at 2 weeks and 4 monthsday of treatment, 2 weeks after treatment, 4 months after treatmentThe subjective quality of family and organizational systems will be assessed by the HFES (Heidelberger Fragebogen zum Erleben in Systemen: Heidelberg Questionnaire on experiences in systems), a self-constructed questionnaire comprising 24 items.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026