Skip to content

Vitamin D and Fish Oil for Autoimmune Disease, Inflammation and Knee Pain

Vitamin D and Fish Oil for Autoimmune Disease, Inflammation and Knee Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01351805
Acronym
VITAL
Enrollment
25871
Registered
2011-05-11
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2025-02-28
Last updated
2025-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autoimmune Diseases, Knee Pain Chronic, Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Inflammatory Process

Keywords

vitamin D, omega-3 fatty acid, fish oil, prevention, trial, autoimmune disease, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, systemic inflammation, Interleukin-6, C-reactive peptide, tumor necrosis factor, osteoarthritis

Brief summary

The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL; NCT 01169259) is a randomized clinical trial in 25,871 U.S. men and women investigating whether taking daily dietary supplements of vitamin D3 (2000 IU) or omega-3 fatty acids (Omacor® fish oil, 1 gram) reduces the risk of developing cancer, heart disease, and stroke in people who do not have a prior history of these illnesses. This ancillary study is being conducted among VITAL participants and will examine whether vitamin D or fish oil have effects upon A) autoimmune disease incidence, B) biomarkers of systemic inflammation, and C) chronic knee pain. Blood samples at baseline and in follow-up will be collected in a randomly selected subcohort of 1500 individuals and analyzed for changes in biomarkers of systemic inflammation: C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-receptor 2. Approximately 1300 individuals with chronic, frequent knee pain will be followed with annual questionnaires to evaluate the effects of the supplements on chronic knee pain.

Interventions

DRUGFish Oil

Subjects will receive marine omega-3 fatty acids (465 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid \[EPA\] and 375 mg of docosahexaenoic acid \[DHA\]).

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTVitamin D

Subjects will receive vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU a day.

OTHERplacebo pill

placebo

Sponsors

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
CollaboratorNIH
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

As for the parent trial, VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL; NCT 01169259). Individuals with chronic, frequent knee pain at study baseline will be followed as a subcohort. Trial enrollment complete.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Interleukin-6 (IL-6)Baseline and 1 yearIn a subsample of the randomized trial population across the four arms, blood samples at baseline and in follow-up were collected and analyzed for changes in biomarkers of systemic inflammation: C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2). We tested whether either or both supplements were associated with a decrease in the biomarkers of systemic inflammation (blood biomarker levels among those receiving supplements vs. placebo). We also tested whether there were interactions between the two supplements in their effects on changes in the IL-6 serum biomarker of systemic inflammation.
Serum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline and 1 yearIn a subsample of the randomized trial population across the four arms, blood samples at baseline and in follow-up were collected and analyzed for changes in biomarkers of systemic inflammation: C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2). We tested whether either or both supplements were associated with a decrease in the biomarkers of systemic inflammation (blood biomarker levels among those receiving supplements vs. placebo). We also tested whether there were interactions between the two supplements in their effects on changes in the CRP serum biomarker of systemic inflammation.
Serum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Tumor Necrosis Factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2)Baseline and 1 yearIn a subsample of the randomized trial population across the four arms, blood samples at baseline and in follow-up were collected and analyzed for changes in biomarkers of systemic inflammation: C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2). We tested whether either or both supplements were associated with a decrease in the biomarkers of systemic inflammation (blood biomarker levels among those receiving supplements vs. placebo). We also tested whether there were interactions between the two supplements in their effects on changes in the TNFR2 serum biomarker of systemic inflammation.
Incident Autoimmune Diseases5 yearsAll participants were followed for the development of new autoimmune diseases, including, but not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, autoimmune thyroid disease, inflammatory bowel disease and polymyalgia rheumatica. The primary endpoint was all incident autoimmune disease confirmed by extensive medical record review. Participants self-reported all incident autoimmune diseases from baseline through follow-up. We used Cox proportional hazards models to test the effects of vitamin D and n-3 fatty acids upon autoimmune disease incidence. We compared the separate main effects of vitamin D or n-3 fatty acid supplement assignment on AD incidence using Cox regression models. To account for randomization stratification and study design, we additionally adjusted for age, sex, self-reported race, and randomization to the other supplement. Person-time was counted until diagnosis of a new confirmed AD, death, or the end of the trial. We also test interactions between the two supplements
Severity of Knee Pain in Subsample With Chronic, Frequent Knee Pain at Baseline- With n-3 FA & Vitamin DBaseline and 5 yearsWestern Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain was the primary outcome on a scale of 0-100 with 100= worst pain. Subsample of VITAL participants with chronic, frequent knee pain at trial baseline were followed with annual WOMAC questionnaires to test for change in severity of chronic knee pain in those taking Omega-3 fish oil (n-3 FA) supplements compared to those taking placebo and for those taking Vitamin D supplements compared to those taking placebo. We tested whether n-3 FA supplements and Vitamin D are associated with reduced levels of WOMAC knee pain at the end of the trial (comparing knee pain outcomes in those receiving supplements to placebo). We will also test whether there were multiplicative interactions between the two supplements for the outcome of knee pain severity by WOMAC-Pain index

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incident Autoimmune Diseaseextension of follow-up through 2 years post trial closure, up to 7 yearsDevelopment of new autoimmune disease through observational follow-up after trial termination.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

From the 25871 VITAL participants, we identified 2 main subcohorts: A systemic inflammation subcohort of 1561 participants with sufficient blood biomarker assays, balanced by sex, and matched on blood draw season, and a second knee pain subcohort including 1,398 participants who returned one knee pain questionnaire and qualified at baseline. Both subcohorts are described below in their respective aims.

Pre-assignment details

At 1 year, 95% of participants returned follow-up questionnaires, and approximately 90% were taking more than two-thirds of study pills (definition of compliance). Participants willing to provide a blood sample were sent a kit with consent form, supplies, and instructions to have blood drawn.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ACTIVE Vitamin D + ACTIVE Omega-3 Fatty Acids
ACTIVE Vitamin D = Vitamin D3, one 2000 IU capsule/day; ACTIVE Omega-3 Fatty Acids = Omacor, one 1-gram capsule/day. Each capsule of Omacor contains 840 milligrams of marine omega-3 fatty acids (465 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid \[EPA\] and 375 mg of docosahexaenoic acid \[DHA\]).
6,463
ACTIVE Vitamin D + PLACEBO Omega-3 Fatty Acids
ACTIVE Vitamin D = Vitamin D3, one 2000 IU capsule/day; PLACEBO Omega-3 Fatty Acids, one capsule/day
6,464
PLACEBO Vitamin D + ACTIVE Omega-3 Fatty Acids
PLACEBO Vitamin D, one capsule/day; ACTIVE Omega-3 Fatty Acids = Omacor, one 1-gram capsule/day. Each capsule of Omacor contains 840 milligrams of marine omega-3 fatty acids (465 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid \[EPA\] and 375 mg of docosahexaenoic acid \[DHA\]).
6,470
PLACEBO Vitamin D + PLACEBO Omega-3 Fatty Acids
PLACEBO Vitamin D, one capsule/day; PLACEBO Omega-3 Fatty Acids, one capsule/day
6,474
Total25,871

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicACTIVE Vitamin D + ACTIVE Omega-3 Fatty AcidsACTIVE Vitamin D + PLACEBO Omega-3 Fatty AcidsPLACEBO Vitamin D + ACTIVE Omega-3 Fatty AcidsPLACEBO Vitamin D + PLACEBO Omega-3 Fatty AcidsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4005 Participants4002 Participants4009 Participants4007 Participants16023 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2458 Participants2462 Participants2461 Participants2467 Participants9848 Participants
Age, Continuous67.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
67.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
67.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
67.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
67.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
1278 Participants1275 Participants1271 Participants1282 Participants5106 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Pacific Islander
102 Participants86 Participants98 Participants102 Participants388 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic (not African American)
246 Participants270 Participants245 Participants252 Participants1013 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American/ Alaskan Native
62 Participants56 Participants58 Participants52 Participants228 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic white
4515 Participants4498 Participants4529 Participants4504 Participants18046 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other/ unknown
126 Participants133 Participants123 Participants141 Participants523 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6463 participants6464 participants6470 participants6474 participants25871 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
3276 Participants3271 Participants3271 Participants3267 Participants13085 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
3187 Participants3193 Participants3199 Participants3207 Participants12786 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
241 / 6,463244 / 6,464252 / 6,470241 / 6,474
other
Total, other adverse events
5,101 / 6,4635,027 / 6,4645,037 / 6,4705,101 / 6,474
serious
Total, serious adverse events
791 / 6,463782 / 6,464822 / 6,470837 / 6,474

Outcome results

Primary

Incident Autoimmune Diseases

All participants were followed for the development of new autoimmune diseases, including, but not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, autoimmune thyroid disease, inflammatory bowel disease and polymyalgia rheumatica. The primary endpoint was all incident autoimmune disease confirmed by extensive medical record review. Participants self-reported all incident autoimmune diseases from baseline through follow-up. We used Cox proportional hazards models to test the effects of vitamin D and n-3 fatty acids upon autoimmune disease incidence. We compared the separate main effects of vitamin D or n-3 fatty acid supplement assignment on AD incidence using Cox regression models. To account for randomization stratification and study design, we additionally adjusted for age, sex, self-reported race, and randomization to the other supplement. Person-time was counted until diagnosis of a new confirmed AD, death, or the end of the trial. We also test interactions between the two supplements

Time frame: 5 years

Population: All participants in VITAL followed for the development of new autoimmune diseases, including, but not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, autoimmune thyroid disease, inflammatory bowel disease and polymyalgia rheumatica. Categorized by vitamin D (active/placebo) and n-3 (active/placebo)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active Vitamin DIncident Autoimmune Diseases123 Participants
Placebo Vitamin DIncident Autoimmune Diseases155 Participants
Active n-3 FAIncident Autoimmune Diseases130 Participants
Placebo n-3 FAIncident Autoimmune Diseases148 Participants
p-value: 0.0595% CI: [0.61, 0.99]Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.1995% CI: [0.67, 1.08]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Test for multiplicative interaction between the effects of randomized treatment groups, vitamin D and n-3 fa on incidence of autoimmune disease.p-value: 0.2P for interaction
Primary

Serum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP)

In a subsample of the randomized trial population across the four arms, blood samples at baseline and in follow-up were collected and analyzed for changes in biomarkers of systemic inflammation: C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2). We tested whether either or both supplements were associated with a decrease in the biomarkers of systemic inflammation (blood biomarker levels among those receiving supplements vs. placebo). We also tested whether there were interactions between the two supplements in their effects on changes in the CRP serum biomarker of systemic inflammation.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 year

Population: Subsample of the VITAL trial participants at baseline and one year.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Active Vitamin DSerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline ln (hsCRP) mg/L, geometric mean (95% Cl)1.48 mg/L
Active Vitamin DSerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP)Year 1 ln (hsCRP) mg/L, geometric mean (95% CI)1.62 mg/L
Placebo Vitamin DSerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP)Year 1 ln (hsCRP) mg/L, geometric mean (95% CI)1.54 mg/L
Placebo Vitamin DSerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline ln (hsCRP) mg/L, geometric mean (95% Cl)1.51 mg/L
Active n-3 FASerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline ln (hsCRP) mg/L, geometric mean (95% Cl)1.57 mg/L
Active n-3 FASerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP)Year 1 ln (hsCRP) mg/L, geometric mean (95% CI)1.63 mg/L
Placebo n-3 FASerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline ln (hsCRP) mg/L, geometric mean (95% Cl)1.43 mg/L
Placebo n-3 FASerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP)Year 1 ln (hsCRP) mg/L, geometric mean (95% CI)1.53 mg/L
Comparison: Geometric means of biomarker concentrations with 95% CIs were calculated for baseline and 1 year biomarkers (IL-6, TNFR2 and CRP) by treatment group (active vs. placebo vitamin D). Linear repeated measures models calculated the % change in means for each biomarker from baseline to year one and the overall effects of randomized treatments with 95% CIs.p-value: 0.1695% CI: [-1.81, 16.87]as above
Comparison: Geometric means of biomarker concentrations with 95% CIs were calculated for baseline and 1 year biomarkers (IL-6, TNFR2 and CRP) by treatment group (active vs. placebo vitamin D). Linear repeated measures models calculated the % change in means for each biomarker from baseline to year one and the overall effects of randomized treatments with 95% CIs.p-value: 0.4495% CI: [-11.92, 4.86]as above
Comparison: Test for multiplicative interaction between effect of vitamin D and effect of omega-3. based on linear models of ln biomarker from baseline to year 1.p-value: 0.38P for interaction
Primary

Serum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Interleukin-6 (IL-6)

In a subsample of the randomized trial population across the four arms, blood samples at baseline and in follow-up were collected and analyzed for changes in biomarkers of systemic inflammation: C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2). We tested whether either or both supplements were associated with a decrease in the biomarkers of systemic inflammation (blood biomarker levels among those receiving supplements vs. placebo). We also tested whether there were interactions between the two supplements in their effects on changes in the IL-6 serum biomarker of systemic inflammation.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 year

Population: Subsample of the VITAL trial participants at baseline and one year.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Active Vitamin DSerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Interleukin-6 (IL-6)Baseline ln (IL-6) pg/ml, geometric mean (95% Cl)1.71 pg/ml
Active Vitamin DSerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Interleukin-6 (IL-6)Year 1 ln (IL-6) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI)1.80 pg/ml
Placebo Vitamin DSerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Interleukin-6 (IL-6)Year 1 ln (IL-6) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI)1.63 pg/ml
Placebo Vitamin DSerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Interleukin-6 (IL-6)Baseline ln (IL-6) pg/ml, geometric mean (95% Cl)1.68 pg/ml
Active n-3 FASerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Interleukin-6 (IL-6)Baseline ln (IL-6) pg/ml, geometric mean (95% Cl)1.69 pg/ml
Active n-3 FASerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Interleukin-6 (IL-6)Year 1 ln (IL-6) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI)1.70 pg/ml
Placebo n-3 FASerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Interleukin-6 (IL-6)Baseline ln (IL-6) pg/ml, geometric mean (95% Cl)1.70 pg/ml
Placebo n-3 FASerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Interleukin-6 (IL-6)Year 1 ln (IL-6) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI)1.72 pg/ml
Comparison: Geometric means of biomarker concentrations with 95% CIs were calculated for baseline and 1 year biomarkers (IL-6, TNFR2 and CRP) by treatment group (active vs. placebo vitamin D). Linear repeated measures models calculated the % change in means for each biomarker from baseline to year one and the overall effects of randomized treatments with 95% CIs.p-value: 0.0295% CI: [1.52, 15.31]as above
Comparison: Geometric means of biomarker concentrations with 95% CIs were calculated for baseline and 1 year biomarkers (IL-6, TNFR2 and CRP) by treatment group (active vs. placebo vitamin D). Linear repeated measures models calculated the % change in means for each biomarker from baseline to year one and the overall effects of randomized treatments with 95% CIs.p-value: 0.9795% CI: [-6.87, 5.81]as above
Comparison: Test for interaction between effect of vitamin D and effect of omega-3 fatty acids on IL-6 change from baseline to 1 yearp-value: 0.12p for interaction
Primary

Serum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Tumor Necrosis Factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2)

In a subsample of the randomized trial population across the four arms, blood samples at baseline and in follow-up were collected and analyzed for changes in biomarkers of systemic inflammation: C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2). We tested whether either or both supplements were associated with a decrease in the biomarkers of systemic inflammation (blood biomarker levels among those receiving supplements vs. placebo). We also tested whether there were interactions between the two supplements in their effects on changes in the TNFR2 serum biomarker of systemic inflammation.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 year

Population: Subsample of the VITAL trial participants at baseline and one year.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Active Vitamin DSerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Tumor Necrosis Factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2)Baseline ln (TNFR2) pg/ml, geometric mean (95% Cl)2546.5 pg/ml
Active Vitamin DSerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Tumor Necrosis Factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2)Year 1 ln (TNFR2) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI)2604.7 pg/ml
Placebo Vitamin DSerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Tumor Necrosis Factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2)Year 1 ln (TNFR2) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI)2567.9 pg/ml
Placebo Vitamin DSerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Tumor Necrosis Factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2)Baseline ln (TNFR2) pg/ml, geometric mean (95% Cl)2525.4 pg/ml
Active n-3 FASerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Tumor Necrosis Factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2)Baseline ln (TNFR2) pg/ml, geometric mean (95% Cl)2571.3 pg/ml
Active n-3 FASerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Tumor Necrosis Factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2)Year 1 ln (TNFR2) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI)2605.3 pg/ml
Placebo n-3 FASerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Tumor Necrosis Factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2)Baseline ln (TNFR2) pg/ml, geometric mean (95% Cl)2500.9 pg/ml
Placebo n-3 FASerum Levels of Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: Tumor Necrosis Factor-receptor 2 (TNFR2)Year 1 ln (TNFR2) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI)2567.3 pg/ml
Comparison: Geometric means of biomarker concentrations with 95% CIs were calculated for baseline and 1 year biomarkers (IL-6, TNFR2 and CRP) by treatment group (active vs. placebo vitamin D). Linear repeated measures models calculated the % change in means for each biomarker from baseline to year one and the overall effects of randomized treatments with 95% CIs.p-value: 0.5795% CI: [-1.03, 2.31]as above
Comparison: Geometric means of biomarker concentrations with 95% CIs were calculated for baseline and 1 year biomarkers (IL-6, TNFR2 and CRP) by treatment group (active vs. placebo vitamin D). Linear repeated measures models calculated the % change in means for each biomarker from baseline to year one and the overall effects of randomized treatments with 95% CIs.p-value: 0.1395% CI: [-2.89, 0.39]as above
Comparison: Test for multiplicative interaction between effect of vitamin D and effect of omega-3. based on linear models of ln biomarker from baseline to year 1.p-value: 0.74P for interaction
Primary

Severity of Knee Pain in Subsample With Chronic, Frequent Knee Pain at Baseline- With n-3 FA & Vitamin D

Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain was the primary outcome on a scale of 0-100 with 100= worst pain. Subsample of VITAL participants with chronic, frequent knee pain at trial baseline were followed with annual WOMAC questionnaires to test for change in severity of chronic knee pain in those taking Omega-3 fish oil (n-3 FA) supplements compared to those taking placebo and for those taking Vitamin D supplements compared to those taking placebo. We tested whether n-3 FA supplements and Vitamin D are associated with reduced levels of WOMAC knee pain at the end of the trial (comparing knee pain outcomes in those receiving supplements to placebo). We will also test whether there were multiplicative interactions between the two supplements for the outcome of knee pain severity by WOMAC-Pain index

Time frame: Baseline and 5 years

Population: Subsample of the VITAL trial who reported chronic frequent knee pain prior to randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Vitamin DSeverity of Knee Pain in Subsample With Chronic, Frequent Knee Pain at Baseline- With n-3 FA & Vitamin DBaseline mean WOMAC Pain36.5 WOMAC units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Active Vitamin DSeverity of Knee Pain in Subsample With Chronic, Frequent Knee Pain at Baseline- With n-3 FA & Vitamin DFollow Up mean WOMAC pain33.6 WOMAC units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Placebo Vitamin DSeverity of Knee Pain in Subsample With Chronic, Frequent Knee Pain at Baseline- With n-3 FA & Vitamin DFollow Up mean WOMAC pain33.7 WOMAC units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Placebo Vitamin DSeverity of Knee Pain in Subsample With Chronic, Frequent Knee Pain at Baseline- With n-3 FA & Vitamin DBaseline mean WOMAC Pain35.4 WOMAC units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Active n-3 FASeverity of Knee Pain in Subsample With Chronic, Frequent Knee Pain at Baseline- With n-3 FA & Vitamin DBaseline mean WOMAC Pain35.4 WOMAC units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Active n-3 FASeverity of Knee Pain in Subsample With Chronic, Frequent Knee Pain at Baseline- With n-3 FA & Vitamin DFollow Up mean WOMAC pain32.7 WOMAC units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Placebo n-3 FASeverity of Knee Pain in Subsample With Chronic, Frequent Knee Pain at Baseline- With n-3 FA & Vitamin DBaseline mean WOMAC Pain36.5 WOMAC units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Placebo n-3 FASeverity of Knee Pain in Subsample With Chronic, Frequent Knee Pain at Baseline- With n-3 FA & Vitamin DFollow Up mean WOMAC pain34.6 WOMAC units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Comparison: Intention to treat analysis using a repeated measures model with unstructured variance to assess the effect of treatment arm on WOMAC Pain adjusting for age, sex, and the other treatment arm. The linear time by treatment interaction term assessed change in WOMAC Pain over time between participants randomized to treatment versus placebo.p-value: 0.77Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Intention to treat analysis using a repeated measures model with unstructured variance to assess the effect of treatment arm on WOMAC Pain adjusting for age, sex, and the other treatment arm. The linear time by treatment interaction term assessed change in WOMAC Pain over time between participants randomized to treatment versus placebo.p-value: 0.41Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Active n3fa vs placebo n3fa among those on placebo vitamin D.p-value: 0.42Regression, Linear
Comparison: Vitamin D vs. vitamin D placebo among those on placebo omega-3 fatty acids- stratified analyses.p-value: 0.18Regression, Linear
Comparison: Omega-3 fatty acids vs. omega-3 fatty acids placebo among those on active vitamin D.p-value: 0.84Regression, Linear
Comparison: Omega-3 fatty acids vs. omega-3 fatty acids placebo among those on placebo vitamin D.p-value: 0.76Regression, Linear
Secondary

Incident Autoimmune Disease

Development of new autoimmune disease through observational follow-up after trial termination.

Time frame: extension of follow-up through 2 years post trial closure, up to 7 years

Population: Baseline enrolled populations

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active Vitamin DIncident Autoimmune Disease255 Participants
Placebo Vitamin DIncident Autoimmune Disease259 Participants
Active n-3 FAIncident Autoimmune Disease234 Participants
Placebo n-3 FAIncident Autoimmune Disease280 Participants
Comparison: HR for incident autoimmune disease in intervention groups vs. placebo (ref=1.0) using Cox models with 95% confidence intervalsp-value: <0.05Regression, Cox

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026