Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Conditions
Keywords
ADHD
Brief summary
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most commonly diagnosed behavioral disorder in children. Prevalence rates in the United States range from 2% to 18% depending on diagnostic criteria and population studied. Primary care physicians, especially pediatricians, have historically played a large role in the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD. Despite the existence of authoritative guidelines to assist primary care physicians, ample evidence demonstrates that they continue to diagnose and treat this disorder suboptimally. This is due, in part, to a lack of training and cumbersome delivery system designs. Modern computer decision support strategies offer the best hope of equipping general practitioners to deal with the mental health epidemic of ADHD. The investigators have developed a novel decision support system for implementing clinical guidelines in pediatric practice. CHICA (Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation) combines three elements: (1) pediatric guidelines encoded in Arden Syntax; (2) a dynamic, scannable paper user interface; and (3) an HL7-compliant interface to existing electronic medical record systems. The result is a system that both delivers just-in-time patient-relevant guidelines to physicians during the clinical encounter, and accurately captures structured data from all who interact with it. Preliminary work with CHICA has demonstrated the feasibility of using the system to implement and evaluate clinical guidelines. The investigators propose to expand CHICA to include ADHD diagnosis and treatment guidelines. The investigators hypothesize that implementation of the ADHD guidelines will result in better outcomes, including higher rates of adherence to recommendations and improved patient functioning.
Detailed description
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most commonly diagnosed behavioral disorder in children. Prevalence rates in the United States range from 2% to 18% depending on diagnostic criteria and population studied. Primary care physicians, especially pediatricians, have historically played a large role in the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD. Despite the existence of authoritative guidelines to assist primary care physicians, ample evidence demonstrates that they continue to diagnose and treat this disorder suboptimally. This is due, in part, to a lack of training and cumbersome delivery system designs. Modern computer decision support strategies offer the best hope of equipping general practitioners to deal with the mental health epidemic of ADHD. The investigators have developed a novel decision support system for implementing clinical guidelines in pediatric practice. CHICA (Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation) combines three elements: (1) pediatric guidelines encoded in Arden Syntax; (2) a dynamic, scannable paper user interface; and (3) an HL7-compliant interface to existing electronic medical record systems. The result is a system that both delivers just-in-time patient-relevant guidelines to physicians during the clinical encounter, and accurately captures structured data from all who interact with it. Preliminary work with CHICA has demonstrated the feasibility of using the system to implement and evaluate clinical guidelines. The investigators propose to expand CHICA to include ADHD diagnosis and treatment guidelines. The investigators hypothesize that implementation of the ADHD guidelines will result in better outcomes, including higher rates of adherence to recommendations and improved patient functioning. The specific research aims of this proposal are: Aim 1: Expand and modify an existing computer-based decision support system (CHICA) to include ADHD treatment and diagnosis guideline rules as well as the capability to fax data directly into the medical record. Aim 2: Evaluate the effect of the CHICA system on the processes of ADHD care in pediatric practices, including adherence to guidelines for ADHD treatment and diagnosis.
Interventions
This module was added to CHICA to help diagnose and manage ADHD
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Child between age 5 and 12 years seen in one of our clinics
Exclusion criteria
* Child outside the age range or who is not seen in one of our clinics.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Number of Children Diagnosed With ADHD With Structured Diagnostic Assessment | one year |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Percent of Patients Receiving ADHD Care Component | one year |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| CHICA ADHD Module This arm received The CHICA ADHD Module
CHICA ADHD Module: This module was added to CHICA to help diagnose and manage ADHD | 42 |
| CHICA ADHD Control This arm received CHICA without the ADHD module | 42 |
| Total | 84 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | CHICA ADHD Module | CHICA ADHD Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 42 Participants | 42 Participants | 84 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 19 Participants | 29 Participants | 48 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 21 Participants | 9 Participants | 30 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 13 Participants | 11 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 29 Participants | 31 Participants | 60 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 42 | 0 / 42 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 42 | 0 / 42 |
Outcome results
Number of Children Diagnosed With ADHD With Structured Diagnostic Assessment
Time frame: one year
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| CHICA ADHD Module | Number of Children Diagnosed With ADHD With Structured Diagnostic Assessment | 34 number of kids |
| CHICA ADHD Control | Number of Children Diagnosed With ADHD With Structured Diagnostic Assessment | 16 number of kids |
Percent of Patients Receiving ADHD Care Component
Time frame: one year
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHICA ADHD Module | Percent of Patients Receiving ADHD Care Component | Medication adjusted | 45 percentage of participants |
| CHICA ADHD Module | Percent of Patients Receiving ADHD Care Component | Reassessment of symptoms | 50 percentage of participants |
| CHICA ADHD Module | Percent of Patients Receiving ADHD Care Component | Mental Health Referral | 74 percentage of participants |
| CHICA ADHD Module | Percent of Patients Receiving ADHD Care Component | Mental Health Visit | 67 percentage of participants |
| CHICA ADHD Control | Percent of Patients Receiving ADHD Care Component | Mental Health Visit | 48 percentage of participants |
| CHICA ADHD Control | Percent of Patients Receiving ADHD Care Component | Medication adjusted | 33 percentage of participants |
| CHICA ADHD Control | Percent of Patients Receiving ADHD Care Component | Mental Health Referral | 55 percentage of participants |
| CHICA ADHD Control | Percent of Patients Receiving ADHD Care Component | Reassessment of symptoms | 33 percentage of participants |