Skip to content

Preperitoneal Versus Pre-trasversalis Hernia Repair

Early and Late Results of Transinguinal Preperitoneal Patch Repair Versus Anterior Pre-Trasversalis Mesh Repair. A Randomised Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01350830
Acronym
PPTHR
Enrollment
253
Registered
2011-05-10
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2011-01-31
Last updated
2011-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Direct Inguinal Hernia, Indirect Inguinal Hernia

Keywords

inguinal hernia, groin hernia, chronic pain, mesh repair

Brief summary

Chronic pain rate is from 0 to 50% after prosthetic groin hernia repair. We compared two anterior technique positioning the mesh in the pre-trasversalis space vs preperitoneal space to assess any differences in term of chronic pain and early and late complications

Detailed description

Chronic pain is evaluated in all presenting types (achy, dull, etc.) moreover foreing body sensation, wall stiffness, paresthesia and numbness are controlled in each patients. Limiting of daily, working, sport and sexual activities (disejaculation) are reported as well.

Interventions

PROCEDUREanterior hernia repair

Inguinal incision is made, external oblique divided and the cord is encircled after identifying ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves. The sac is dissected and reduced, in case of direct hernia the posterior wall of inguinal canal is plicated with polypropylene suture; in presence of indirect hernia the sac is reduced and a stitch is passed in manner that the deep ring is snug about the cord. A pre-shaped mesh is positioned on the floor of the canal around the cord with the two tails overlapping laterally; the mesh is then anchored to the pubic tubercle. External oblique is reapproximated with the cord transposed in the subcutaneous space and skin is sutured.

PROCEDUREtransinguinal preperitoneal patch repair

Through a 5-cm inguinal incision external oblique fascia is divided, cremasteric fibers are separated and the elements of the cord are skeletonized. Indirect or direct hernia is approached and through the hernia orifice, the sac is reduced, preperitoneal space is accessed and dissected to allow easily placement of the patch facilitated by the memory recoil ring. In case of indirect hernia the lateral part of patch is split and the two tails sutured around vas and gonadic vessels. Hernia orifice is closed with a polypropylene stitch through transversalis fascia and the mesh; external oblique is closed followed by skin approximation.

Sponsors

San Bonifacio Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years older

Exclusion criteria

* recurrent inguinal hernia * previous low abdominal operation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
chronic pain rate6 monthsphone interview and clinic visit

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
recurrence rate2 yearsclinic visit

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026