Skip to content

Hepatic Resection Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Complicated by Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis

Hepatic Resection Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Complicated by Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis.A Prospective and Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01350206
Enrollment
180
Registered
2011-05-09
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2011-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma With PVTT

Keywords

Carcinoma,Hepatocellular, Liver Neoplasms, Therapeutic, Chemoembolization,, TACE, hepatic resection

Brief summary

The treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis (PVTT) is still controversial, and there is no universally agreed protocol for its treatment. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has become the most popular palliative treatment for patients with unresectable HCC, and it is no longer considered as a contraindication to HCC with PVTT. Unfortunately, the long term outcomes are generally poor for HCC treated with TACE, especially for HCC with PVTT. HR remains the only therapeutic option that may still offer a chance of cure. With advances in surgical techniques, it has become feasible to remove all gross tumors, including PVTT which has extended to the main portal vein, safely by surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HR as compared with TACE to treat patients with HCC with PVTT. The investigators also aimed to identify patient groups that might benefit more from either treatment with HR or TACE.

Detailed description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer and the third most frequent cause of cancer death worldwide. Hepatic resection (HR) is the conventional curative treatment for HCC. In both the European and the Unit States Proposed Guidelines for HCC, HR is recommended only for patients with preserved liver function and with a single HCC lesion. Unfortunately, because of tumor multifocality, portal vein invasion, and underlying advanced cirrhosis, only 10%-30% of HCCs are amenable to such a curative treatment at the time of diagnosis. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has become the most popular palliative treatment for patients with unresectable HCC, and it is no longer considered as a contraindication to HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Unfortunately, the long term outcomes are generally poor for HCC treated with TACE, especially for HCC with PVTT. To improve on the results of treatment of HCC with PVTT, attempts have been made to perform HR for these patients . HCC with PVTT remains a contraindication to liver transplantation because of the high rate of tumor recurrence, and because of the severe shortage of donor organs. HR remains the only therapeutic option that may still offer a chance of cure. With advances in surgical techniques, it has become feasible to remove all gross tumors, including PVTT which has extended to the main portal vein, safely by surgery. More HCC with PVTT, which previously were considered as unresectable, have become resectable. Recent studies have even shown favorable long-term survival outcomes of HR in well-selected cases of HCC with PVTT. However, the survival outcomes of patients with HCC with PVTT treated with HR or with TACE have not been properly compared. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HR as compared with TACE to treat patients with HCC with PVTT. The investigators also aimed to identify patient groups that might benefit more from either treatment with HR or TACE.

Interventions

PROCEDUREhepatic resection

HR was carried out under general anesthesia using a right subcostal incision with a midline extension. Intraoperative ultrasound was routinely performed. Pringle's maneuver was routinely used with a clamp/unclamp time of 10 minutes/5 minutes.Thrombectomy was performed according to the location and extent of PVTT. The en bloc technique was used for patients if the portal vein branch could be ligated with a sufficient safety margin between its root and the tip of the thrombus

PROCEDURETACE

TACE with chemotherapy drugs (EADM 50mg, lobaplatin 50mg, and MMC 6mg )mixed with iodized oil lipidol

Sponsors

Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. age between 18 and 75 years, 2. HCC with no previous treatment, 3. the presence of PVTT on imaging, 4. Eastern Co-operative Group performance status 0 , 5. resectable disease, which is defined as the possibility of completely removing all gross tumors and retaining a sufficient liver remnant to sustain life, as assessed by our surgery team.

Exclusion criteria

1. the presence of extrahepatic spread on imaging, 2. a Child-Pugh class C liver cirrhosis, or ICG-R15 \>30%, or evidence of hepatic decompensation including ascites, esophageal or gastric variceal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy, 3. an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 3

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
overall survival1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time to progression1 year

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactMin-Shan Chen, M.D. Ph.D.
Chminsh@mail.sysu.edu.cn(8620) 8734 3117

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026